Rear of 36 Hall St. Photo by BFD.
The Boston Fire Department reports firefighters responded to 36 Hall St. at 4:22 a.m. for what turned into a two-alarm fire.
The department identifies the cause as: " careless disposal of smoking materials, 1st floor rear porch."
The fire, which started in the rear of the building, displaced three residents and caused an estimated $400,000 in damage, the department reports, adding there were no injuries.
Neighborhoods:
Topics:
Free tagging:
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Damage estimates
By Gary C
Wed, 11/23/2016 - 9:56am
I know it's not the BFD's job to provide accurate damage estimates, but come on, only $400,000 damage in that photo? There ain't nothing left! You can't buy an outhouse in JP for $400k and that certainly looks like it'll need to be built over from scratch.
I always fell like the damage estimates are way low of what it will actually cost to repair the building.
Sounds right to me
By Jay P.
Wed, 11/23/2016 - 10:01am
http://www.cityofboston.gov/assessing/search/?pid=...
The tax assessor puts the total value at $651k. Of that, $445k is in the structure. Assuming the foundation is intact, a $400k rebuild is totally reasonable.
For the building
By anonamizzle
Wed, 11/23/2016 - 12:30pm
It's in the ballpark for building something that size on an existing lot with basement already dug. But that number doesn't include contents, which it probably should.
Purchase Price
By Terrapin
Wed, 11/23/2016 - 11:15am
The purchase price includes the land, which presumably was not destroyed. I can't tell by the picture. Typically land adds to the value, so the estimate could be appropriate.
However, if there were environmental toxins in the home that should not have been in a residential dwelling (i.e. chemicals for a Meth Lab) then the site would be contaminated and remediation would be necessary, making the land a liability and not an asset. This would add to the damage estimate and you would be correct.
Either way, I agree with you that dollar estimates of damage are rather unnecessary and by definition are rather silly since so little is known about the property condition immediately upon extinguishing the flames. All that can reasonable be determined is the extent of the damage to the structure which seems to me that a percentage of destruction is more reasonable than a dollar estimate.
As a JP resident the real question is whether the rebuild will be considered gentrification or a simple rebuild of already affordable housing. I guess that depends on the race of the current occupants. I will wait to offer my opinion on that, but expect a follow up article if the G word is raised by community organizers.
How do you
By Patricia Roberts
Wed, 11/23/2016 - 4:34pm
know the apartments destroyed in the fire were affordable?
Eerie looking. When will
By anon
Wed, 11/23/2016 - 10:44am
Eerie looking. When will smokers learn.
Maybe it's me and I'm blind
By anon
Wed, 11/23/2016 - 11:29am
Maybe it's me and I'm blind and am missing something. Where does it say it was caused by smoking? I thought it was from one of those space heaters.
Careless disposal of smoking materials per BFD
By callmewhatyoulike
Wed, 11/23/2016 - 12:13pm
https://twitter.com/BostonFire/status/801384065127...
JP fire
By anon
Wed, 11/23/2016 - 12:13pm
The Boston Fire Department @BostonFire tweeted about it this morning:
Yep
By adamg
Wed, 11/23/2016 - 12:30pm
Thanks, I've updated the original post.
People who pay $10 a pack to
By Kinopio
Wed, 11/23/2016 - 12:40pm
People who pay $10 a pack to get cancer and look, smell and feel like crap don't have the best judgement. You can't count the number of houses smokers have burned down in Boston this year on both of your hands. The city should put another tax, maybe a dollar per pack, to pay for the damage smokers cause.
I don't support the
By anon
Wed, 11/23/2016 - 3:17pm
I don't support the government getting involved, but a movement to get landlords, HOAs, and so on, to ban this shit from their properties is something I could get behind. A lot of landlords already do. That's what we need more of.
oh yes
By Scumquistador
Wed, 11/23/2016 - 8:00pm
prohibition, thats always worked very well in the past. i see no reason why it wouldnt work just as well in the future.
Have it in all my leases -
By anon
Thu, 11/24/2016 - 9:32pm
Have it in all my leases - but still tenant/their guest's cigarettes caused 2 fires on back porches and two fires at front of property from drivers tossing cigarettes out window (and landing in my front yard mulch!) not kidding! So hard to combat!
Add comment