Hey, there! Log in / Register

JP gang member had long list of people he wanted dead, but the hitman he tried to hire was a federal informant

A federal judge yesterday sentenced Boylston Street gang member Jaime Rivera, 20, to nine years in federal prison for a murder-to-hire plot and for distribution of cocaine, the US Attorney's office reports.

Rivera pleaded guilty last fall, acknowledging that he offered to pay somebody $2,500 to murder a rival for the guy's role in a brawl on July 4, 2015 that left Rivera with a gunshot wound to the arm - and another Boylston Street member with multiple stab wounds. Unfortunately for him, it turned out the guy he offered the money to was a wire-wearing federal informant.

According to a federal sentencing memorandum in the case, the guy Rivera wanted dead was busy stabbing Rivera's Boylston Street pal, Frandys Ortiz - who separately got 8 years for his part in the drug dealing - so Rivera shot him, after which one of the rival's associates shot Rivera.

Rivera, who also boasted of shooting somebody's eye out, took his prospective hitman for a ride around the city nine days after the fight to firm up arrangements for the hit:

On July 13, 2015, the defendant drove around Boston with the CW [cooperating witness] pointing out various housing projects where he wanted people killed, including Academy Homes, D Street Projects, St. Joseph’s Housing Development and H-Block. At one point in the conversation, Rivera cautions the CW that he does not want any “leg shots.”

RIVERA: But I need you to hit these niggas up though bro. I don’t need any leg shots bro … if you gonna do leg shots don’t even do it nig-

Although Rivera pleaded guilty, his lawyer and federal prosecutors disagreed on their recommendations to Judge Rya Zobel on how long Rivera should serve.

Assistant US Attorney Rachel Hermani argued for at least 14 years:

Jaime Rivera is associated with the Boylston Street gang. He has no employment history, and it appears that the defendant has earned his livelihood selling drugs and firearms. He has not identified any mental health issues or substance abuse issues which would in any way explain or mitigate his conduct.

But Rivera's lawyer, Stylianus Sinnis, argued for leniency and no more than five years.

Rivera, he said, was still a teen when he committed the crimes, and teen minds are still not fully formed, he argued.

Mr. Rivera was 18 when he committed the instant drug offense and 19 when he committed the murder-for-hire. Quite simply, he lacked the maturity and judgment of an adult.

As important, Rivera had been seriously screwed up by his father, who introduced him to marijuana and who spent years denigrating the teen, telling him he would never amount to anything, as well as beating his mother.

Sinnis continued that the one time Rivera got away from his father - when his mother scraped together $5,000 to send him to a boarding school in Utah - he did very well, racking up a 3.5 GPA. He included a letter from his mother:

The first time my son tried marijuana, it was because his father offered it to him. His father discouraged him from going to school. He constantly told Jaime that he could not amount to anything because of his race; that because he is dark skinned, he would end up either dead or in jail.

Also, the attorney continued, the idea to kill the rival came from Ortiz, who began talking to the informant about it just two days after his stabbing and Rivera's shooting. Rivera, he wrote, did not talk to the informant about a possible hit until a week later.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Dead and Feds do not rhyme

up
Voting closed 0

Still, I've changed the headline.

up
Voting closed 0

There's a dearth of male mentors. Boston Big Brother Big Sister needs men!
https://www.bbbsmb.org

up
Voting closed 0

Mass incarceration of black males for nonviolent offenses... The gift that keeps on giving.

up
Voting closed 0

Except he tried to have a guy killed. That's a nonviolent offense to you?

up
Voting closed 0

Felicity pointed out the lack of adult male mentors.

And I opined that lack of adult male mentors was yet another negative effect of the mass incarceration of black males for nonviolent offenses.

And you reach the conclusion that I'm therefore calling Jaime Rivera a nonviolent offender.

I'd love to see the trail of logic that led you to that conclusion laid out.

up
Voting closed 0

Mass incarceration if armed gangbangers is the reason why we're down to 30 murders from hundreds in the late 80s/early 90s.

up
Voting closed 0

You're letting reality get in the way of a good narrative.

I've often wondered where the author of "The New Jim Crow" lived in the 1980s. On a farm in the country is my bet.

up
Voting closed 0

I could ask about why we're arresting people for selling cocaine, or why somebody with the constitution to give a child weed and belittle him wasn't incentivized out of the heat-of-the-moment breeding pool in the first place, or even why the U.S. attorney seems to believe that one has to be mentally ill or on drugs to sell drugs and guns (hint, lady with two college degrees, people want to buy those things), but I won't.

Instead, with absolutely no knowledge of this particular labor market whatsoever, how in the actual hell is $2,500 the going rate to whack a guy? I would guess it's five figures, no? That somebody would accept that rate didn't trigger Johnny Gangbanger's BS detector? Why is the 20 year old member of this gang making these decisions? Is there not a senior gang member who would handle hiring and vetting a hitman?

up
Voting closed 0

It seems Rivera and the other guy were also running guns, at least according to an affidavit by an AFT agent in the other guy's case. Plus, Boylston Street wasn't exactly a boy's club of kids just shooting hoops.

up
Voting closed 0

But I'm not clear as to how any of that addresses my questions in the original post.

up
Voting closed 0

Law follows natural law. There is a repulsion to the use of drugs that's in us.

up
Voting closed 0

Care to provide the scientific evidence behind this story?

up
Voting closed 0

Law follows natural law.

On the contrary, law exists to oppose the tendency of natural law to make life, in Hobbes's words, "nasty, brutish, and short."

There is a repulsion to the use of drugs that's in us.

If there were a natural repulsion to the use of drugs, then there wouldn't be a need for a law prohibiting it. There is no law prohibiting drinking Drano, nor one against smearing oneself with dog feces. Unlike drinking Drano or smearing oneself with dog feces, taking drugs is something that (many) people obviously want to do and enjoy doing.

up
Voting closed 0

We are suspicious of drug users. It's because we want to assess the health of the people we encounter.

up
Voting closed 0

I could ask about why we're arresting people for selling cocaine,

Uhh, because it isn't legal?

even why the U.S. attorney seems to believe that one has to be mentally ill or on drugs to sell drugs and guns

The statement was presented as being in the context of sentencing, where these issues being in play would have a direct effect on the sentence given.

up
Voting closed 0

Yes, guy, I'm aware that cocaine isn't legal. That it isn't legal is a crock of (expletive). Hence, my rhetorical wonder why people are being arrested for selling it.

Does that make any sense to you? An entity declaring a botanical product "illegal?"

up
Voting closed 0

.... as any drug warrior will patiently explain to you,

Drugs are bad because they're illegal, and it's bad to do illegal things.
Drugs are illegal because they're bad, and we make bad things illegal.

up
Voting closed 0

Very distinct actions towards one another. Hope this will be a lesson,but what about the people involved there probably doing the same thing jst this guy got caught..oh its gonna be a wild summer..

up
Voting closed 0

Gone are the days of last summer when just a leg shot would do.

up
Voting closed 0