Hey, there! Log in / Register

Malden bank manager charged with slow-motion bank robbery over several months

A teller supervisor at a bank in Malden is charged with walking out of his bank with $375,000 in cash over several months - and trying to hide his tracks by creating bogus records to make it seem like the money had been transferred to the Federal Reserve Bank in Boston.

Pablo Rocha, 32, of Melrose, was arrested today on a federal charge of bank fraud, according to court documents. The documents do not name the bank, but Rocha's LinkedIn page lists him as a teller supervisor at the Malden branch of Brookline Bank.

According to the criminal "information" in his case, Rocha withdrew the money in several installments between July and December of last year.

On or about July 18, 2022, ROCHA wrote a false entry in the Bank's manual log to make it appear that there was approximately $122,000 in cash in the vault that was not in fact there.

On or about August 23, 2022, ROCHA wrote a false entry in the Bank's manual log to make it appear that there was approximately $230,000 in cash in the vault that was not in fact there.

On or about September 21, 2022, ROCHA processed a fake transaction in the Bank's electronic records system to make it appear that $308,000 in cash had been sent from the Bank to the FRBB.

On or about November 18, 2022, after the Bank identified that the $308,000 transfer had not occurred, ROCHA processed another fake transaction in the Bank's electronic records system to make it appear that a $362,000 in cash had been sent from the Bank to the FRBB.

On Dec. 8, the document continues, the bank flagged the last transaction as bogus since it never actually happened. Then, the document says:

ROCHA processed another fake transaction in the Bank’s electronic records system to make it appear that $375,000 in cash had been sent from the Bank to the Federal Reserve.

Innocent, etc.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Complete Information181.1 KB


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

I've got my BayBanks card, I'm a real go-getter!

up
Voting closed 1

Oh wow. I went to high school with this guy. Super nice, but never was the brightest bulb.

up
Voting closed 0

This seems similar to the PNC Bank fraud reported last month.

https://www.universalhub.com/2023/manager-back-bay-bank-admits-he-siphon...

Seems pretty stupid, I would think a bank manager should know that they'll be caught if they try this, and yet they tried.

up
Voting closed 1

Money corrupts people.. large sums of cash passing thru your hands every day can have an effect on you and your judgement.

I also feel that the quality of bank employee has gone down. Banks for many years were a tough industry to get a job in because of trust. You had to pass several background checks, credit checks, give your first born in blood, etc to get a job. And this was to work in a very stuffy environment. (Banks for decades were known to be very stuffy)

Now.. so many branches, banks have had to make concessions and here is what you get. Less than stellar employees with ulterior motives.

up
Voting closed 1

Why are there so many bank branches at all? So few people need to do business in person and deal with cash. One would think banks would be closing branches, not opening them, yet that's the opposite of what's happening. Why is that?

up
Voting closed 2

Remember the CapitalOne bank @ Park Street that took over the Finagle-a-bagel that had been there for eons. Its gone.

They open and close faster than Froyo shops these days. Great for dispensaries that want a vault in a few years.

I think its a tax thing.. or related to the whole TARP thing in 2008 when the credit card companies lost their shirts. Ever notice who's opening up branches left and right? It's not any of the incumbent banks like Sovereign or Citizens, even BoA. Its PNC Bank, Capital One Bank, CitiBank.. banks that never had a presence here before 2008.

And prior to 2008 were primarily known for their (crappy) credit card and loan offerings. Since at the time, TARP was restricted to banks that had physical branches, and not credit card companies, or rather former banks that had huge credit card divisions that pretty much took over their business, like Capital One. So they all lost their shirts and rapidly started expanding physical branches. To ensure that any future bailouts, etc would come to them.

It is 100% a tax cheat (its a losing venture because who goes into a branch these days) and a write off. All happening very quietly under regulators noses because technically what they are doing isn't wrong, its just a loophole.

I can't provide links to directly backup what I am saying but read up on "Ally Bank" (formerly GMAC financing) and Capital One's expansion post 2007. Amazing how they tripled locations in a few years, after spending over a decade in the 90s reducing their locations in their home region and expanding the CC division by a 2 fold.

I mean if this doesn't smell rotten.. and to happen to several of these 'banks' post-TARP, the coincidences are just too uncanny. Combined with basic knowledge of 'tax write offs' makes it obvious these branches are just these. And regardless, most credit cards now offer 'checking accounts', I get offers from Citi and Amex all the time now. They want to be seen as a bank.. not a credit card company.

Look at what happened with Silicon Valley Bank, they got help instantly because of depositors. If they were a credit card company it would have been like "good luck" from regulators and the fed.

All in all its just a scam. I know very few people who have banks outside of local institution thats been here for a while (including Citizens, BoA, and Sovereign), so there's no need to have so many branches. There's so many banks now, and many good local institutions.. why would anyone want to go to Citibank or CapitalOne, unless they travel alot, but even then that's negligible. So there is more to this than just 'servicing our customers'.. because there are none.

up
Voting closed 1

and closed all of their branches, retreating from the Boston area. Now Chase is trying to win where Citi lost.

Capital One branches at least double as pleasant Peet's coffee shops.

up
Voting closed 2

Branches are to some degree a marketing exercise -- people walking/driving by see a branch and are reminded or informed of the bank's brand/products. That's why they typically have advertisements in the windows. They also differentiate a traditional bank's offerings from a fintech company or banks that operate mostly online (like Discover Bank or USAA Bank or Ally, for example). Business customers often still need branches as well because they are taking cash as part of their business. And for things like lending -- both consumer and business -- there's still a fair bit of activity which happens in an office at the bank.

But banks are closing branches, too. Citi put a bunch of effort and money into opening branches in the Boston market back around 2008 and closed them all several years back. Webster Bank took over most of those locations and closed them recently too.

up
Voting closed 2

Santander has actually been closing branches in MA.

Counterpoint: Chase just opened a branch in West Roxbury, which we all know is very deficient in bank branches right now.

up
Voting closed 1

They never would have gained a foothold in this market if the Bank of Boston, Fleet failed merger hadn't required a Bank of America rescue, which regulators only allowed if the old Shawmut branches weren't spun off. They may not always be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but credit unions at least have employees who can complete basic banking functions without having to run by three levels of management.

up
Voting closed 3

Is it as a cheap billboard for passing commuters on Centre St that WRox has an apparently limitless attraction for banks (real banks, not TARP-hungry credit card companies, to quote cybah above) to open branches?

Or is there really that much business and real estate work to go around in the neighborhood?

up
Voting closed 2

Not enough foot traffic (and who the fuck wants to actually drive from place to place on centre street and park over and over) to support businesses which require actual customers. Look how many vacant shops there are in Westie as well.

The fact the city allowed Chase to build a new bank building in that lot is obscene. When they decide to move locations again in 4 years (because they had just opened a little location in the strip mall where the Ace Hardware is), that building will be useless for anything else. Should have just paved the whole thing and made it into overflow parking for all the doordash assholes who constantly clog up the street - I mean they SHOULD'VE put in housing but that's a nonstarter, at least parking would have eliminated a social ill.

up
Voting closed 1

What would do if the ancient outdated power grid in Massachusetts failed even for a day's let ? Or we had a rolling blackout like several other states experience. And none of the atms or point of sales registers.were.wprkong and like you said Noone has cash anymore now your debit cards don't work. Wouldn't you want a teller at a bank who is human and doesn't need electricity to do its job there to hand you cash, and have it close by cause the gas pumps wouldn't be pumping gas and you aren't walking miles to get to one if you're too lazy to go in a bank or not smart enough to have some cash at home . Hope that answered your question

up
Voting closed 2

Another is casual privacy: Buying a bagel shouldn't require a multiparty transaction giving N corporations your location-at-time and cream cheese preferences.

up
Voting closed 3

You can't get cash out of the bank if their power is off. Source: have tried it. They use computers and electronic systems the same as anyone else.

up
Voting closed 0

Maybe banks should stop opening so many branches that sit COMPLETELY EMPTY 80% of the time and suck up real estate that could contribute to the fabric of commercial districts and tempt landlords to sit on empty, decaying buildings in the hope of a future bank contract and continually build obnoxious parking lots with drive throughs instead of reasonable use of land in a city!!

Easily 20% of branches in this town could be gone TOMORROW and the banks could redistribute employees and get rid of the low performers and nobody would be negatively effected AT ALL.

up
Voting closed 1