Hey, there! Log in / Register

Revere hotel says Boston owes it $654,000 for holding rooms for Mass and Cass homeless who never came

The owner of a Quality Inn on the Revere/Saugus line is suing the Boston Public Health Commission for the money it says it's owed for holding all of its rooms for three months in 2021 for Mass and Cass denizens who Boston never actually sent there once Revere and Saugus officials erupted in anger on learning of the plan.

In a lawsuit filed in Suffolk Superior Court on Friday, Sudguru Hotel of Brockton says its contract with the commission required the commission to pay for the rooms even if it never actually used them, and that because of the deal, the hotel didn't rent the rooms to anybody else.

The hotel, like many others, had closed at the start of the pandemic in the spring of 2020 - and it remained shut until earlier this year.

The Janey administration wanted to use the hotel as transitional housing for the people it was trying to move out of Mass and Cass.

Sudguru says it held all its rooms for commission use from Sept. 24, 2021 through Dec. 31, 2021. In the suit, Sudguru says that while its contract let the commission terminate the deal early, the commission never notified tbe company that it wanted to do so.

The company says it sent its first bill in October, 2021, followed up with two more invoices and then a notice of default ,and has yet to receive any payments.

BPHC did not contest or question the invoices during the months that Sudguru held the rooms for BPHC. ... BPHC has not paid anything nor has it explained any basis for its failure to either terminate the Agreement or make payment.

In addition to the invoice amounts, Sudguru is also asking for damages, including for the "difficulties in its relationship" with non-Boston government bodies once news of the deal got out.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Complete complaint837.95 KB


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

At least they solved the Mass and Cass crisis

up
Voting closed 0

I think the city for Revere owes that bill.

up
Voting closed 1

That is one silly statement. If Boston had really engaged with Revere insteady of attempting to bully them this never would have happened. If Boston didn't have a single hotel in it's city limits that would be one thing but they clearly have thousands.

I'm happy Janey lost big. She was so far out of her element. She only ran because she was acting Mayor. I think Wu would have won no matter what but Janey hobbled Andrea Campbell right out of the gate. Although things seemed to work out better for Campbell though.

up
Voting closed 1

The Mass and Cass crisis has become an MBTA crisis as the unhoused have migrated to the subways for shelter during the cold winter months.

up
Voting closed 0

so they're going to have a hard time justifying full price in the damages.

up
Voting closed 1

Doesn’t matter. The contract says the city owes them $X.

up
Voting closed 1

They could have engaged another municipality with a similar deal or an NGO that sheltered the unhoused. It was an opportunity cost. We don't know if they couldn't rent them out or not.

Additionally, it was a contract. Or are we all now in the Trump school of cost reductions?

up
Voting closed 2

and of course I think Boston should abide by the contract. But this quote from the hotel:

« because of the deal, the hotel didn't rent the rooms to anybody else »

...doesn't ring true. If they're relying on that claim in any way, they're going to have some trouble.

up
Voting closed 2

The hotel was closed in 2020. They could have opened up again in 2021 as some other hotels did especially after vaccines hit the market. Then they had pipe issues. If they had in fact been operating all that time the pipes may not have frozen.

Plus it's a contract so they were ready to roll by that point.

Also let's consider the fact that in the other story posted we see this agreement may have caused them issues with Revere.

up
Voting closed 0

I once screwed up a reservation and showed up a week late. I was charged for the night I didn't show up. That was a part of the reservation process, agreeing to pay.

Now, if during discovery we find out that the hotel was renting the rooms out during the period, it would be tough to claim damages, but my bet is that they didn't rent them out, as they were sent aside for dealing with homeless people.

up
Voting closed 1

What I'm saying is that even once they were out of the reserved period, they *still* weren't renting out rooms.

up
Voting closed 1

never go well for the City of Boston and their legal? Team.

up
Voting closed 1

They never seem to go to court unless it involves something intangible like the right to fly a flag on city hall plaza.

BTW: Which anon are you?

up
Voting closed 0