Hey, there! Log in / Register

Three residential buildings approved in East Boston

McKay Place rendering

McKay Place rendering by Zephyr Architects.

The Zoning Board of Appeal today approved a 41-unit condo building at McKay Place and Maverick Street in Jeffries Point and two apartment building with a total of 41 units at the Orient Heights rotary where Saratoga, Ford and Boardman streets meet.

Developer John Murphy and partners won approval to replace three triple deckers and the little used Progressive Club with 41 condos, of which 7, or 17%, would be sold as affordable. A total of 11 units in the $12-million project would have three bedrooms.

Residents who opposed the project said they were concerned about kindergartners from the neighboring McKay School getting flattened by drivers entering and exiting the building's 35-space garage and by the way one side of already congested McKay Place would be blocked for a year by construction vehicles. Project attorney Derric Smalls said warning lights and alarms would be added to the garage entrance.

City Councilor Erin Murphy (at large) supported the project, citing in part the number of affordable units.

City Councilor Gabriela Coletta (East Boston, Charlestown, North End) opposed the project because it would not have 20% of its units sold as affordable. The board's unanimous vote in favor of the project included a proviso that the developer go back to the BPDA - which approved the project in August - to try to increase the number of affordable units by at least one to bring it closer to that 20% level. Current city requirements call for a minimum of 13% affordable units; the mayor has proposed increasing that to 17%.

Coletta, however, approved a 41-unit proposal for Orient Heights even though it, too, called for 17% of its units being affordable, as apartments, rather than condos. Her aide who attended both hearings did not explain the difference.

Rendering of proposed Orient Heights buildings by Context:

Rendering of proposed Orient Heights buildings

Developer MG2 says it will raze an auto-repair garage at the rotary and use what is now a parking lot across the street to put up two buildings at a total cost of about $11 million. In addition to the 41 apartments, the project would include two retail spaces and 10 parking spaces at the site, a short walk to the Orient Heights Blue Line stop.

Some nearby residents, and the owner of the neighboring Mi Pueblito restaurant, opposed the project because of what they said was inadequate parking.

Along with the Orient Heights Neighborhood Council, which voted 40-3 with 2 abstentions to oppose, they said that people living in the buildings would fill already scarce parking spaces in the Orient Heights commercial area, jeopardizing its small businesses. Britton Munson, attorney for the neighboring Mi Pueblito restaurant said the building would mean "a nightmare" for local shops and their customers, particularly during the area's frequent funerals, whose attendees already take up parking spaces.

MG2 attorney Richard Lynds countered that his client offered up the number of spaces it did at the recommendation of the BPDA - which approved the project in September - and the Boston Transportation Department, in part due to its location near the T stop.

Lynd said he was surprised to hear opposition from Mi Pueblito. He said Munson's comments at today's hearing were the first he'd heard of it, that he and MG2 would have been happy to sit down and thrash out the issue with them beforehand - like earlier this year, when the restaurant had its own zoning issue. In July, the restaurant went before the board for approval to put up a canopy over its outdoor patio.

9 McKay Pl. filings.
2 Ford St. and 970 Saratoga St. filings.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

City Councilor Gabriela Coletta (East Boston, Charlestown, North End) opposed the project because it would not have 20% of its units sold as affordable. The board's unanimous vote in favor of the project included a proviso that the developer go back to the BPDA - which approved the project in August - to try to increase the number of affordable units by at least one to bring it closer to that 20% level. Current city requirements call for a minimum of 13% affordable units; the mayor has proposed increasing that to 17%.

Thanks for covering this. Coletta is one of the those NIMBY elected officials who coats her opposition in progressive language like this. Not only is this contrary to what the mayor is trying to do as noted, the councilor doesn't seem to understand that 20% of zero is still zero. She's fought new affordable housing elsewhere in her district including the Charlestown Navy Yard and the rezoning of industrial parts of Charlestown to enable more housing there. Coletta should just be honest with her constituents that she doesn't want new housing built in her district rather than pretending there's some progressive ideology at play here.

up
Voting closed 0

The only time you hear of Coletta is the counselor’s steadfast opposition to housing. And it’s the typical, banal nimbyism: “There’s so much that’s happening all at once.”

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/09/27/business/charlestown-development-...

up
Voting closed 0

I have always wondered about the history of the Progressive Club. Is it abandoned? I can't recall ever seeing a reference to it in any of the old Eastie newspapers, even the ones going back to the early 20th century.

up
Voting closed 0

Some nearby residents, and the owner of the neighboring Mi Pueblito restaurant, opposed the project because of what they said was inadequate parking.

I think if opponents of any project say "but people won't be able to park their cars" .. then the BDPA needs to send someone out to start counting cars for a month and who really is parking. I guarantee you'll see that these cries for 'parking' are for selfish reasons only (i.e. ownership of these places who need places to park THEIR cars), and has little to do with actual customers who come in on cars and can't find a place to park.

We gotta stop crying wolf when it comes to parking.. we just gotta. It is almost at nauseum people say this crap now just to oppose anything.

Mother nature doesn't care about your parking needs when the sea levels rise due to rising overall planet temperatures.

IMAGE(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51984989279_c08a6e2b8b_w.jpg)

up
Voting closed 0

I agree with this to the degree that we also follow up with 2 things:

  1. For new infill developments like these, do not give them resident parking stickers. Every developer's attorney says the same thing - we're near the T, so no one will own a car, which is of course demonstrable and verifiable bullshit. If you have the money to buy these units, you can afford a car for when you want to use it - which might not be your commute but your weekend trips, trips to the supermarket etc. Make it so the cars have to be in their garages.
  2. The legislature needs to actually invest in the T so that is a viable means of reliable, 24-7 transportation and not a flaming wagon of death that's always late. Then those developers' claims might actually start being true sometimes, as people actually would take the T and drop the expense of a car.
up
Voting closed 0