Hey, there! Log in / Register

Developer unwraps plans for complete rebuild and expansion of Faneuil Gardens development in Brighton

Rendering of proposed new Faneuil Gardens development

Rendering by J. Garland Enterprises/Moody Noland/MVRDV.

The Community Builders has filed plans with the BPDA to replace the 1940s barracks-like apartment buildings at Faneuil Gardens, off Faneuil and North Beacon streets, with five taller buildings that would have apartments for current residents and 183 apartments for new tenants - as well as a new community center and a tree-lined pedestrian "boulevard."

The Boston Housing Agency selected the non-profit developer to help it remake the complex, which has not seen any major capital improvements in 70 years, in the latest example of the agency working with a private concern to rebuild a federally funded development for which the federal government long ago gave up financing.

Following seventy years without significant capital improvements, the buildings are in poor condition; the units are substantially smaller than City of Boston and State square footage guidelines, the Site is deeply energy inefficient, all buildings lack a proper second means of egress, there are no accessible buildings or units, and most materials and systems are beyond the end of their useful lives.

The current 600 or so residents, living in 258 apartments on the 7.5-acre site, would be guaranteed new units in the new complex, to be built in five phases. The 183 additional units would be rented to people making between 30% and 120% of the Boston area median income.

The buildings would rise as high as seven stories, although with some three-story wings.

Open space and some of the lower wings

Ten apartments would be set aside as "live/work" units aimed at residents with an entrepreneurial bent. In contrast to most other live/work proposals in recent years, not all of these units would be aimed at artists.

The proposal calls for 154 parking spaces in surface lots - far cheaper to build than garages - ground-floor retail space and realignment of the buildings and walkways to make it feel more a part of the surrounding neighborhood and less of an isolated complex. This would include a pedestrian "table" on Faneuil Street to force drivers to slow down and not slam into kids crossing the street to McKinney Park.

Layout of the new buildings

In addition to the pedestrian boulevard, the 3.6 acres of open space in the proposal would include courtyards for each of the residential buildings featuring benches and tables.

Faneuil Gardens filings and meeting schedule.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

not seen any major capital improvements in 70 decades,

So no major capital improvements since 1324?

up
Voting closed 6

Or maybe ye reporter couldn't decide between "7 decades" and "70 years" and so went with the best of both. Or something. In any case, fixed, thanks.

up
Voting closed 6

A wonderful opportunity to rename the development for someone who wasn’t slave owner

up
Voting closed 1

This area isn't named for that Peter Faneuil.

Benjamin Faneuil inherited his brothers fortune. We're all waiting to hear more about his own track record.

up
Voting closed 2

He inherited his brothers slaves as well.

up
Voting closed 1

Shockingly bad urban form.

I'm having a hard time understanding why this is being treated as a superblock when the surrounding neighborhood fabric would recommend 3-4 blocks.

Surface parking increase from 132-154 (vs new structured) - the amount of developable land dedicated to this surface parking verges on 20% of the project surface area!!!!

Also, apparently the parking lots deserve a better streetwall than the streets themselves? Why the aversion to a 'normal' street grid?

up
Voting closed 2

They consolidated parking at the edges basically creating streets on either side, and I'm guessing in the process they found that they could actually fit more spots. If they kept the number of spots the same then they'd have been left with a few patches of awkward "green space" among the parking lots. But maybe that's a bonus if your dog has to take a dump.

They put a pedestrian street right through the middle of the block. I agree the layout is a bit loose but I think avoiding enclosed courtyards is probably the right call and I like how they tapered off the building heights from the edge to the pedestrian street.

The unfortunate reality is fine grained urbanism isn't economical to build, so how to arrange a bunch of large boxes in a way that works? I do agree with your sentiments but I'm sure it's a tougher puzzle than it appears. And I have seen much much worse recently, and I'm glad it's not as bad as those.

up
Voting closed 7

Offer no streets which would connect to new streets in the development. To the south there's a park. To the east and west are commercial buildings. The surrounding neighborhood isn't generally large multifamily buildings so the street grid will necessarily be different.

I'm not sure why you think there should be new streets through the development which would connect to absolutely nothing? It's nicer for the residents to have walkable open spaces versus streets that people could use to cut through.

up
Voting closed 1

Jane Jacobs agrees. 'Towers in a park' (mid-rises in this case) have failed time and time again since the 50's to benefit their occupants and the surrounding streetlife.

up
Voting closed 2

Faneuil is a successful housing development, family and kid friendly, scaled to the surrounding neighborhood. The streets do not need to be "realigned" to connect with the neighborhood. Seven story buildings, adjacent to the surrounding two to three story homes and two story commercial structures, will create walls of brick and shadows that are unwelcoming to everyone,

up
Voting closed 2