The Zoning Board of Appeal today rejected plans for what would have been Boston's first non-hospital birthing center on Winthrop Street in Roxbury after nearby residents and the district city councilor said the new building was the wrong idea for a parcel on a historic residential street.
The board actually voted 4-3 in favor of the proposal by the Neighborhood Birth Center to raze two former residences - one condemned by the city -Â for a new building with four birthing rooms and offices for six other non-profit groups, but state law requires at least five votes in favor.
The board then voted 5-2 to deny the proposal without prejudice.
That vote means that, theoretically, Neighborhood Birth Center's Nashira Baril could come back within a year with a modified plan. But board member Hansy Better Barraza - who supported the proposal - cautioned that given the neighborhood opposition, anything short of ditching the idea of a birthing center and offices in favor of the housing residents said they wanted instead would likely result in another rejection.
The board had initially heard the case on Feb. 4, but deferred any vote until today to give proponents a chance to meet with nearby residents to try to resolve issues.
City Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson said she supports the idea of an independent birthing center, just not on Winthrop Street. She said she would love to work with Baril to find a more suitable site in the more commercial areas of Roxbury; she cited Warren and Quincy streets in particular.
Fernandes Anderson said she's tired of people from outside Roxbury - in this case Jamaica Plain and Mattapan - trying to shove things down Roxbury residents' throats. And she expressed disappointment in her fellow elected officials - state Sen. Liz Miranda, state Rep. Chris Worrell and city councilors Ruthzee Louijeune and Brian Worrell - for supporting the project without ever showing up at any neighborhood meetings about it. Through an aide, Councilor Erin Murphy (at large) said she also could not support the location and called for work to find a better spot.
Those officials who supported the project, however, said the birthing center would provide a much needed service for the Black community, which has historically suffered poorer birth outcomes than other groups, in a home-like center under the care of local midwives.
Miranda said she fully understands the historic nature of Roxbury in general and Winthrop Street in particular, but said the project would not change the fundamental nature of the street, did not involve out-of-town for-profit developers pushing office buildings on the neighborhood and would provide a service that could improve the birth process for local residents.
She noted that neither of the two buildings on the site are currently occupied; one is in such bad shape that ISD says it should be torn down.
Neighbor Sophia Burks, however, said the project would set a precedent that would lead to more development along the street, but that even more immediately, the project was "a group of businesses attempting to rezone" residential land, in a community that had made it clear it doesn't want that.
Like Fernandes Anderson, she said she rejects the idea of outsiders telling her and her neighbors what their future should be.
The project needed variances in part because clinics and offices are barred by the lot's zoning.
In addition to Better Barraza, members Norm Stembridge, Giovanny Valencia and Katie Whewell initially voted for the variances the project needed. Members Alan Langham, David Collins and Sherry Dong voted against.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
The definition of NIMBYism
By anon
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 3:15pm
Community groups should have to demonstrate a much higher level of harm to prevent development in this city than they currently do. We’re living under the tyranny of delusional busybodies who think cities are museums, not living spaces that change with time.
Bizzare
By MyManMyMelo
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 3:43pm
I don’t even I legitimately can’t even imagine what the argument is against a breathing center really anywhere
Â
What exactly is wrong with the location and why does it need to be in a commercial area? Legitimately asking Adam.Â
this wouldn’t attract traffic, crime, litter, or noise so what  actually is the gripe?
The fear of gentrification.
By anon
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 4:11pm
The fear of gentrification. "Neighbor Sophia Burks, however, said the project would set a precedent that would lead to more development along the street"
The residents fear real estate values going up, and so would their rents.
This!!
By SharpWave
Wed, 02/26/2025 - 12:19pm
Often when there's poorly reasoned / moral panic-type opposition to development, it's propelled by fear of gentrification.
Breathing no but birthing
By anon
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 4:13pm
Breathing no but birthing will certainly will
Know what is historical?
By SwirlyGrrl
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 7:43pm
Home birth. So a birthing center in a residential-ish area is rather historical.
Nothing pushes gentrification like luxury condos going in - but that seems to be what they will end up getting.
"Historically a residential street"
By SC
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 4:06pm
This parcel is next to a laundromat, and less than 50 feet from Warren Street which is a busy/commercial street.
There's also already multiple churches and a giant charter school. In fact, it look like this stretch of Winthrop Street (from Greenville to Warren) is less than 50% residential buildings.
Here’s how to spend the
By Chris77
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 4:18pm
Here’s how to spend the perfect day in Mattapan
Next up…
By anon
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 5:12pm
Nonprofit forced to sell parcel to some developer because the project isn’t viable and they don’t have infinite money, probably has to shut down, now nobody gets a birth center anywhere. New developer proposes for-profit market-rate housing, but probably needs yet another zoning variance because pretty much nothing profitable can be built by-right anywhere in this city. Rejected by neighbors because “we don’t want gentrificationâ€. And the cycle continues. So sick of this institutionalized right to the status quo we have here - whether in Roxbury or Brookline, it all ends up the same.
There is more than meets the eye going on here...
By RoxburyResident
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 5:13pm
I am a Black woman and a lifelong resident of Roxbury. I live less than 0.5 mile from Winthrop street. I was all for this project until I did a bit more research into the it. This was advertised as a birthing center but it is much more than that. This was presented to locals as a birth center, however, this space will be home to a total of SIX non-profits organizations. I think the general consensus is abutters are okay with the birthing center (see Black Maternal health disparities if you aren't aware of this issue) and a birthing center alone, and many support the idea, however it's the addition of all the other businesses abutters are worried about. Take out all the other "non-profits", make this a birthing center as was advertised and I think things would be much different.
Why the quotes around "non-profit"?
By AdamB
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 9:12pm
What are we missing?
This is the battle you choose
By RoxburyResident
Wed, 02/26/2025 - 12:49pm
This is the battle you choose? I used the quotations because, at the end of the day, a non-profit is still a business and the addition of these 5 other non-profits in this one space is most likely the reason why abutters don’t want this project there. A business is still a business, whether they operate for profit or not. This is a very small side street, no matter how close it is to Warren Street. Business drives up traffic, congestion, property values, etc. - all the things abutters are most concerned about and discussed in the appeal meeting. I understand the financial difficulty in operating a free-standing birth center, however, strategically advertising this project to the black community as a birth center, pulling at heart strings of the very community that is most affected by maternal health disparities, with plans for 5 other businesses in fine print, is flat out wrong.
Birth center, plus five
By Emma
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 11:43pm
One of the nonprofits IS the birth center.
But you have to compromise if you want a birthing center at all
By deedle
Wed, 02/26/2025 - 10:35am
Per the Bay State Banner, the other organizations who signed on include:
It sounds like the birthing center needs the other tenants to help offset its own costs:
Â
Coincidentally, the Boston Public Health Commission just released its Health Equity Agenda report, the city's proposals to reduce health inequities, particularly gaps in life expectancy (see also the Bay State Banner article). In the Infant & Maternal Health section, the authors note "Stark racial and ethnic health inequities exist in infant mortality and maternal morbidity and mortality in Boston." See the Health of Boston 2023 Maternal and Infant Health Report for detailed stats. Sad to see this birthing center in Roxbury get rejected.
This!!!
By Emma
Wed, 02/26/2025 - 1:18pm
Hospitals LOSE MONEY every time someone on masshealth has a low-intervention physiological birth. They’re literally financially incentivized to induce, intervene, use anesthesia, and do cesarean births leading to longer hospital stays and worse outcomes for families.
All the other birth centers in New England were tiny places owned by one white woman who suddenly close when they realize they’re not making any money and leaving the communities high and dry without this resource.
See: birthwise midwifery school in Maine, concord birth center in New Hampshire
Also see: the hospital-owned birth centers in Cambridge and Beverly- those hospitals lose money on those low-intervention care centers and don’t care to keep them operating.
Anderson -Tired of People From Mattapan and JP Shoving Things...
By John Costello
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 5:48pm
Honey - We are tired of you grifting on the public dollar.
Â
So, is Tania on the take again?
By Friartuck
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 7:59pm
This time influencing a real estate transaction? How can she be allowed to have any influence on items such as this?
Not my words
By TFA
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 8:19pm
I said ‘I’m sick and tired…’???
Huh?
Ten years
By Emma
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 11:05pm
This nonprofit has been trying to open a freestanding birth center in Boston for a decade. Massachusetts only has one free standing (non hospital operated) birthing center, and it’s in Northampton. Cambridge hospital closed their birth center in 2020, Beverly hospital also closed theirs. People need this option. All local hospitals (save for Mt. Auburn midwives in Cambridge) have had their c section rates go up (some way up) since 2021. We have plenty of high risk medical centers around. There are *no* low risk practices around here. This is a big community need, too bad the neighbors see the operating of other nonprofits on site as a dealbreaker.
Same thing in Cleveland last year
By Emma
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 11:44pm
https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/local-news/cleveland-nonprofit-aims-...
Really upsetting.
By BikeBoston45
Wed, 02/26/2025 - 8:53am
The people involved in advocating for and organizing this birth center are thoughtful people approaching a complex subject in an intersectional and antiracist way. Okay, they're from JP and Mattapan--so they're not allowed to plan for something in Roxbury? Roxbury is far more the heart of the city, and the center of Black Boston, than JP, and if something like this were proposed for JP it would be criticized as pandering to white upper middle class women, to the gentrifiers. Mattapan is significantly harder to get to by public transit than this location. They are hardly "outsiders" coming in to colonize Roxbury. Look at the people opposed to this. Erin, proponent of police in BPS, does not have a great track record on equity. Tania--I also wondered who she was getting money from in this case. Objecting to the other nonprofits being there makes no sense--they are not big pharma, in to mine the neighborhood. They are nonprofits, people.
This
By Emma
Wed, 02/26/2025 - 9:36am
Roxbury is a lot closer to several of the major hospitals in the area, which the birth center can use for back ups. Mattapan isn’t as close.
The public good
By anon
Wed, 02/26/2025 - 9:59am
Non-profits are public charities and operate “for the public good.â€
Given the income inequality and public health issues concerns in Roxbury, abutters and neighbors should be welcoming the birthing center with open arms.
Many of the other Boston neighborhoods must contend with real estate development limited to science labs and luxury condos.
People from one Boston
By anon
Wed, 02/26/2025 - 1:45pm
People from one Boston neighborhood should be allowed to open a birthing center in another Boston neighborhood. It's ridiculous to force people to find space for their organization without crossing a neighborhood line from the place where they live.
Add comment