A federal magistrate today approved extradition to Turkey for a teenager facing the equivalent of motor-vehicle homicide charges after he allegedly sped around a 17-m.p.h. curve at more than 100 m.p.h., slamming into people on the side of the road, killing one of them and injuring four others.
The teen and his mother were arrested at the British International School of Boston in Jamaica Plain last June just before they were to tour the campus as a possible new school after their sudden departure from Istanbul following the deadly crash - and a stay in Florida, with a trip to see the sights in New York.
In his ruling, US District Court Magistrate Judge Donald Cabell rejected all of the teen's arguments to let him stay in the U.S., including that the victim didn't die from internal hemorrhaging caused by being hit by a speeding SUV but by the long ambulance ride to a more distant hospital and the slow treatment he got there.
Cabell also rejected the idea that the teen - not named in court documents because of his age - could not be extradited because the crime he is wanted for in Turkey is not exactly the same as what he might be charged with here, as required by the American/Turkish extradition treaty. Cabell concluded the key thing is that killing somebody by recklessly ramming into them at a high rate of speed is a felony on either side of the Atlantic.
T.C.'s conduct entailed driving a Porsche at more than five times the speed limit late at night on a two-lane road and not listening to requests by passengers in the Porsche to slow down. The prosecutor's report details T.C.'s conduct including exceeding the speed limit. Unable to take the bend in the road, the Porsche skidded and crashed into the ATV riders standing on the side of the road. Although not intentional, such conduct was nonetheless reckless. The prosecutor's report further describes T.C.'s conduct as causing the death of O.M.A. and injuries to the four other ATV riders. The foregoing conduct is criminal under Turkish law, as explained in detail in the prosecutor's report. ...
Further, such conduct, if committed in the United States, is proscribed under federal law as involuntary manslaughter. 18 U.S.C. § 1112(b) (defining manslaughter as "unlawful killing of a human being without malice"). Relative to Article 2(1)(b), the appendix lists "manslaughter" as an extraditable offense.
Cabell also rejected the argument that just because a prosecutor in Istanbul issued an arrest warrant for the teen that doesn't mean the teen has been formally "charged" with a crime, as required by the treaty, only that he is being investigated for it. It is unclear if Cabell raised an eyebrow as he discussed the definition of the noun "charge" and the verbs "to charge" and "to formally charge" as cited in Black's Law Dictionary and decisions involving other people who have tried this argument to say this was nonsense. Also:
In a related argument, T.C. relies on the Turkish, as opposed to the English, version of the Treaty and notes that the Turkish version uses the word "Kovusturma". Based on "representations by Turkish counsel," T.C. states that Kovusturma "is the process after an indictment is filed and accepted by the Turkish court." Further, so he contends, the Turkish version of the Treaty does not reference "Sorusturma" which, he represents, refers to the investigatory stage. From this, T.C. posits that the Treaty allows the extradition of "individuals that have been charged ('Kovusturma') rather than those that are wanted by investigators in relation to a pending investigation ('Sorusturma')." The argument is not convincing.
First and foremost, Article 6 of the Treaty requires the supporting documents of an extradition request to be in English.
Although the teen has gone unnamed in court documents, his mother, Eylem Tok, has been named in her own extradition proceedings. She's a Turkish author married to Bülent Cihantimur, a prominent Turkish plastic surgeon who specializes in "amazing butt surgery."
Innocent, etc.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 306.16 KB |
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
It's always nice to see
By xyz
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 3:14pm
It's always nice to see consequences for a rich prick who thinks they can flout the law. Just saying.
Cruel irony
By Bostoneer
Wed, 02/12/2025 - 9:16am
The cruel irony is if he did it in Boston he’d probably get away with it. Look at how the police haven’t released info about the driver who went onto the sidewalk and killed someone.
When you asked for that information....
By Pete Nice
Wed, 02/12/2025 - 7:00pm
What was the public record exemption they cited for not giving it to you?
They pretend it never happened
By SwirlyGrrl
Wed, 02/12/2025 - 8:28pm
The police have thus far not responded to public records requests on the matter claiming to still be investigating.
I won't name my sources, other than to say they are journalists who have tried FOIA.
Someone will eventually leak this information. They are protecting some rich fuck from charges and we all know that.
They have to respond
By Pete Nice
Wed, 02/12/2025 - 9:24pm
And there is an exemption listed. Ask your source what it is.
The law says they have to respond
By SwirlyGrrl
Wed, 02/12/2025 - 9:43pm
The reality is that Massachusetts cops don't think these laws apply to them.
They responded though
By Pete Nice
Thu, 02/13/2025 - 10:29am
With exemptions listed.
So I'll ask again, what did they list as the exemption to this?
They didn't respond
By SwirlyGrrl
Thu, 02/13/2025 - 1:58pm
"still investigating"
Did you miss that part?
You missed that part.
Supposed author, formerly married to butt surgeon
By mg
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 4:13pm
According to the Daily Sabah article you linked to, there are questions about whether Tok actually wrote any books. It also says she's divorced from the amazing butt surgeon.
As to "the victim didn't die from internal hemorrhaging caused by being hit by a speeding SUV but by the long ambulance ride to a more distant hospital and the slow treatment he got there", I guess the kid gets his chutzpah from his parents.
Should've taken a shot at the "affluenza" defense too
By tachometer
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 8:47pm
Seems like the circumstances fit that attempted defense at least.
He's not being tried in the US
By SwirlyGrrl
Wed, 02/12/2025 - 9:46pm
This was an extradition hearing, so it is isn't a matter of "defense". All this court cares about are the extradition treaty issues. Such an argument has zero relevance for that - that is up to the courts in Turkey to decide if it matters.
I take this as a sign of hope!
By MrZip
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 5:23pm
Consequences for the rich who commit crimes, yes please! Come on Karma, you got some catching up to do!
Well consequences in Turkey.
By anon
Wed, 02/12/2025 - 7:17am
Well consequences in Turkey. If this had happened in the US he might have got a ticket at most. If he killed pedestrians or bicyclists, cops would have just said "he probably couldn't see them" and sent him on his way. The US doesnt take killing people with your car seriously.
His name is all over the internet
By Daniel
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 6:08pm
it's Timur Cihantimur
If someone is supposedly too
By Kinopio
Wed, 02/12/2025 - 8:00am
If someone is supposedly too young to be named in court or tried as an adult then they should also be too young to operate a vehicle.
That is one of the charges
By SwirlyGrrl
Wed, 02/12/2025 - 9:52pm
In Turkey, where the reckless behavior occurred.
Bad hit
By THE_WIZ
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 8:16pm
On the corruption scale
By StillFromDorchester
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 8:53pm
Of 100 being very honest and 0 being very corrupt, Turkey is a 34
I wonder if their money will get him out of this
He can always stay here and work for DOGE
By Plen-T-Pak
Wed, 02/12/2025 - 6:59am
.
How would that benefit him?
By StillFromDorchester
Wed, 02/12/2025 - 8:02pm
❔
Good. I prefer him to be charged.
By Blabbermouth
Sat, 02/15/2025 - 3:59pm
This ruling must tick Tok off.
Add comment