Hey, there! Log in / Register

The frantic foot chase before the wedding carjacking

UPDATE: Suspect arrested.

Ian Gold had just put his three-year-old daughter down for a nap when he smelled cigarette smoke. Odd, since nobody in his family smokes. Then he saw a guy racing down the stairs of their home on Howes Street in Dorchester.

That was the start of a frightening chase Saturday afternoon that ended only when the man smashed in the window of a limo outside Blessed Mother Teresa Church at Columbia Road and Dorchester Avenue, punched and pushed the driver out, ordered the bridesmaids in the back out. Even though Gold was on the phone with a dispatcher as he chased the guy through his neighborhood, he says police didn't arrive until after the man drove away in the limo.

In an e-mail interview with Universal Hub, Gold said he and his family were out when his wife dropped him and their younger daughter, 3, off so she could take their older daughter, 8, to an art class.

"I came in with her on my shoulder (she was asleep), put her in our bed on the second floor. I smelled cigarettes, which was strange. He must've been on the second floor in the bedroom when I came in, and gone upstairs. He then scampered down the stairs - I watched him go down from the bedroom. He appeared to be in his mid to late 40s, white, haggard, squat build with a paunch. Wore baggy clothes. Surprising that he was so spry, really.

"I chased him and confronted him on the stairs. He had the hammer in his hand and said 'keep back, keep back.'"

Gold says he did just that and watched the man run out the back door of the house and jump over a back yard fence - with two duffel bags full of stuff he'd taken. At the very same time, he says, his mother-in-law, who lives with them, came in. With somebody to watch after his daughter, he didn't think twice: He ran out of the house after the guy:

"I called 911 and then stayed on the phone with them for about 5 blocks and (according to my phone log) 7 minutes, describing to the dispatcher what was happening. He tried to carjack three other cars. I read out the license plate of the first car, as I thought it was an accomplice of his. He then tried to open the door of a Hummer. Both of these cars were on a street called Edison Green, waiting to turn on to Dorchester Avenue. He then went at a woman who was at the trunk of her car. I believe he thought he could grab her keys out of her hand, and that he did touch her, but I was too close at this point and she ran away and so did he."

"I narrated the whole sequence to the dispatcher, calling out street names, and was on the phone with them in front of the limo at Mother Teresa's while he attempted to wrest the keys from the driver. This was a protracted struggle, during which I pleaded with the police to get there, told them where we were, and during which a police wagon and police car passed by on Columbia Road, but then didn't stop and turned off down Dorchester Avenue. If they had made a U Turn, they would have been able to prevent or stop the crime."

Today, Gold is still shaken, sad that the guy got away with his wife's engagement ring - it had been his grandmother's - and upset police didn't arrive until it was too late, but grateful his daughter stayed asleep through the whole thing. The carjacking housebreaker remains at large.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

that allows a guy to run amok for 7 minutes without officers in the immediate area not be notified?

up
Voting closed 0

i'm not a lawyer, but the police have no responsibility to protect or defend you. they preserve the peace. if they have the time and opportunity, they'll help you. we are responsible for our own safety

up
Voting closed 0

You may not be a lawyer, but you are clearly a troll.

The following is taken directly from the BPL web site:

Mission Statement

We dedicate ourselves to work in partnership with the community to fight crime, reduce fear and improve the quality of life in our neighborhoods.

Our Mission is Neighborhood Policing.

Care to explain how not responding to a home invasion, auto theft *and* violent crime in progress accomplishes any of the above, or as you have alternatively offered - 'preserves' the peace?

up
Voting closed 0

To be fair... he may have a point. I remember reading an article on NYT about it, googling it found what might be the article (I don't have time to reread the entire thing). http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28scotu...

There other links in that search that talk about it too.

up
Voting closed 0

No. The SC decision which you referenced has to do with the very narrow definition of federally-recognized constitutional obligation. Professional responsibility is a much broader category. For example, the counterperson at Dunkin Donuts has no consitutional duty not to spit in your coffee, but if he does, you sure as heck have a legitimate right to feel injured and to seek some remedy (even if it's just the remedy of complaint - which is what we are excercising here).

Boston deserves better than this (and to be clear - I'm not talking about the rank and file here - I'm sure >99% of the officers in the field would have *loved* the opportunity to take this guy down). But the BPD is the most senior police organization in the western hemisphere. Its leaders - and the mayor of this city - have spent a lot of time bragging about all the new resources they've committed to community policing and rapid "real-time" response.

So it's perfectly reasonable that citizens of Boston should expect that when police are informed of a violent crime-in-progress, we will see them respond in a timely manner.

up
Voting closed 0

it's been to the Supreme Court a couple of times. or so i've been told.

this might be one of them: Warren v. District of Columbia

the police keep the peace and protects the population as a whole, but have no duty or obligation to the individual.

up
Voting closed 0

But basically, they can't be sued for making the "wrong" decision, but they can be sued if they fail to act (equal protection under the law).

Most of this comes from a 1980's domestic violence case in CT where a wifes repeated calls to police were basically ignored until the husband finally ended up stabbing her (pretty horrific police work but I can't remember what town it was in Tarrington? I think one of the cops stopped home for dinner or something when the wife called to say the husband showed up)

But basically the wife sued the police and town and won a few million bucks because the police failed to protect her and respond when she called.

This case was also one of the landmark cases which forces police into mandatory arrest policies for domestic violence instead of treating domestic violence as "private issues" between families. and using their discresion.

up
Voting closed 0

and her husband Charles stabbed her repeatedly and then kicked her in the head in front of police officers, who did nothing. this was after repeated attempts for her to get help and intenvention from her incredibly abusive husband. the town was Torrington CT. and the case is Thurman V. City of Torrington. she eventually won $2.3 million, and changed a lot of laws about how police need to respond.

you basically got it all right -- the courts actually held that this was an equal protection violation, and that Tracey Thurman was not helped because domestic assualt was not viewed the same as non-domestic assault.

up
Voting closed 0

This was a protracted struggle, during which I pleaded with the police to get there, told them where we were, and during which a police wagon and police car passed by on Columbia Road, but then didn't stop and turned off down Dorchester Avenue. If they had made a U Turn, they would have been able to prevent or stop the crime."

Wow. That's just awesome. He's on the phone with the dispatcher for almost 10 minutes calling out street names etc, and that was plenty of time to put out a radio call for an armed home invasion, etc. The only greater gift they could have had was a GPS unit on the dude.

All the units in the area should have known where they were and been keeping their eyes peeled. And then not one but two BPD units drive right by an obvious struggle and don't stop to do anything.

The carjacking housebreaker remains at large.

*golf clap* Take a bow, BPD.

I wonder why none of this made the papers. The Globe's writeup was mostly a ha-ha, isn't-that-a-crazy-wedding-experience article. Not "hammer-wielding asshole robs house with sleeping baby, gets chased by homeowner, keystone kop response."

up
Voting closed 0

I wonder why none of this made the papers. The Globe's writeup was mostly a ha-ha, isn't-that-a-crazy-wedding-experience article. Not "hammer-wielding asshole robs house with sleeping baby, gets chased by homeowner, keystone kop response."

And this is why Adam is awesome.

up
Voting closed 0

Maybe we could have put some of these unfit cops in the unemployment line.

Oh, wait, WE VOTED TO NOT CUT THE BUDGET.

We need another Reagan. We really do.

up
Voting closed 0

The Boston Police was unable to hire (I believe 300 officers) because they couldn't find quality candidates. They actually took transfers the last 3 years for the first time in the history of the department because no one wants to be a police officer anymore.

I don't know the whole story here but I'd say there is a 90% chance that this person may have called the state police line? That always takes another 10 minutes.

Or like Brett said, there is the chance that human beings were to dumb to understand where to go when someone tells you to go there. About a .3 percent chance that happend.

Of course Brett is an internet hero, so he would be the expert on that one.

up
Voting closed 0

...from dorchester or any place within boston, then there is a 100% chance that he got the state police. they handle all the 911 cell phone calls, and usually transfer them to the Boston 911 call center.

up
Voting closed 0

If he dialed 911 and got State Police, and it takes so long to relay word to BPD that the guy can attempt to steal other cars before he finally escapes in a limo, we've got a problem.

If he dialed BPD (some of us do have their direct emergency line on speed dial) and it took that long for a cruiser to respond, we've got a problem.

up
Voting closed 0

Just heard back from Ian on this point.

up
Voting closed 0

I dialed 911 when I was biking home about a year ago and saw a big pile of mail and leaves on fire in an entry way to a six unit attached wooden row house.

They hooked me to State Police. I said SOMERVILLE fire department.

I gave the address and cross streets.

Fire trucks showed up two minutes later.

up
Voting closed 0

I highly doubt it. But that is the problem with these time perceptions. Usually it is the other way around. I've witnessed car accidents, called them in on a police radio and then waited what seems like 15 minutes when it really is probably close to 5 minutes. You sit there and wait and wait and wait, and then you even call back dispatch and ask for an ETA for the ambulance, fire or whatever else is coming.

up
Voting closed 0

I knew it would feel like OMFG where are they its taking forever! and I needed to stay calm and alert.

They showed up two minutes later - I heard sirens little more than a minute later. Somerville is very compact and very serious about short response times. The trucks came wrong way from a station just up the hill. They had guys with extinguishers jump from the truck at the corner and run a couple doors down the street to knock the fire down good before they could get the truck down.

Pretty amazing.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm looking at some local logs right now. I don't think I've ever seen a fire or police response time under 4 minutes from the inital call. A 3 minute response would be almost impossible.

up
Voting closed 0

Do you really think that a budget cut would increase response time?

up
Voting closed 0

No we didn't - at least, I didn't see any questions on my ballot that addressed the city's police department budget. Perhaps you are obliquely referring to the ballot question to cut the state sales tax.

In any case, how exactly would having less police officers on the street address the issue of poor response times?

up
Voting closed 0

Sounds good to me,

When we raising taxes from our historical lows so we can actually afford to hire professionals?

up
Voting closed 0

Hopefully the BPD will release, or the media will FOIA, both the 911 and police radio recordings, all of which are time stamped. The computer aided dispatch system should also be looked at to see how the call was originally entered. The type of crime (code) entered determines the "stacking order" of priority.

My hunch is that the civilian 911 operator in one room probably entered the call using the routine B&E code, while the patrolman who dispatches the calls over the radio from another room didn't immediately realize it was an in progress armed home invasion with the suspect being chased by the lawful occupant. Most B&E's are reported long after the crime has ended and are low priority, requiring only a one officer response when time allows. If it wasn't made clear that this was a crime in progress, the call could have been stacked awaiting dispatch. Again, that's just a hunch.

Rest assured that the overwhelming majority of police officers relish nothing more than the opportunity to make an arrest in a violent, multiple felony case like this one. There's nothing worse than getting to a scene within two minutes of being sent, only to have the caller say, "I called ten minutes ago, you could have caught him if you got here quicker." Cmsr. Davis should investigate, report back and make improvements where necessary.

up
Voting closed 0

Make a Citizens Group Felony Arrest - next time.

up
Voting closed 0

10 min. except for these guys:

"Calling 911 from your cellphone
911 calls made from a cellphone are routed to the State Police and forwarded to Boston Police, Boston EMS or Boston Fire as appropriate. This transfer process provides full Enhanced 911 capabilities. The processing of wireless 911 calls in this manner in no way reduces the efficiency of 911 response."

http://www.bpdnews.com/about/emergency-911/

up
Voting closed 0

what about the caller?

I... was on the phone with them in front of the limo at Mother Teresa's while he attempted to wrest the keys from the driver. This was a protracted struggle, during which I pleaded with the police to get there

Why didn't he at this point assist the limo driver? Again, the police failed, but I would think that the driver and caller working together could have subdued the criminal.

up
Voting closed 0

Maybe because the bad guy had a hammer and Mr. Gold was trying to get the armed public safety professionals to show up and do their job?

Don't blame the victims - it's kind of douchey.

up
Voting closed 0

Mr. Gold made the right choice when confronted with the man in his home. What I'm questioning is his decision to be an observer when the man with the hammer was assaulting another person. In the first instance, he was faced with a choice between certain safety and potential endangerment, but in the second, he was faced with a choice between watching somebody take a beat down and trying to help his fellow man.

[edit to add]
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, here. Maybe he wasn't that close, maybe he thought the police were almost there and he could most help by providing more details, etc. But the way it's written, I have the image of him just standing idly by. I hope that's not what happened.
[edit]

up
Voting closed 0

re: your addt edited remarks - I was just writing something to that effect. While one could certainly have taken his account in the way you (originally) seemed to, I think that only a few moments reflection would allow one to arrive at the possibility of an alternative scenario.

If you had simply asked for clarification, I would not have responded as I did. It was your second sentence that came off as unduly judgmental. Even in your reconsidered addendum you are including all sorts of qualifiers that you didn't bother with in your first strongly stated opinion.

I really think that chasing a thief/assailant for several blocks while trying to get the police on the phone qualifies Mr. Gold as a sufficiently engaged citizen.

up
Voting closed 0

There are many reasons somebody might not be willing to get physically engaged:

Physical ability or injury reasons

Not wanting to get killed because of kids/family

Driver or bridesmaid may have a gun and may miss or mistake him for an accomplice

Being mistaken for the perpetrator or believed to be an accomplice by police in a brawl situation

Prior record or probation issue

Immigration issues that would surface if criminally charged

up
Voting closed 0

This may be a good post to point this out - if you need 911 assistance in Boston and are on a cell phone - program 617-343-4911 into your cell phone, it's the direct 911 line (eg, same as when calling 911 from a landline).

up
Voting closed 0

According to the link posted above, though, that line is intended for anonymous calls and is not an "Enhanced 911" line, meaning your location and identity are not provided. That could end up being cause for a delay in response time.

up
Voting closed 0

As of last April, BPD wasn't making much use of cellular E911. Yes it gives them a latitude and longitude, but it's not connected directly into their dispatch system. So they're just going to end up asking you for your street address anyway.

I have the direct number on speed dial in my cell phone, and I've advised all my Boston-area friends to do the same. When there's an emergency happening right in front of you, you don't want to waste 20 or 30 seconds getting transferred through the State Police dispatcher.

I suppose if I were locked in the trunk of a moving car and couldn't tell where I was, I might call 911. Ditto if I actually wanted to reach the State Police and not the locals.

up
Voting closed 0

about this incident. Brett, you may need to read it two or three times.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/art...

up
Voting closed 0

I hope you notice the part about 3 minutes 50 seconds

up
Voting closed 0

but since he does believe everything the internet says, maybe he will change his mind.

The biggest point though is that whatever Brett thinks or does has zero impact on everyone's lives. And we can thank god for that.

up
Voting closed 0