I was shocked when I first bike-commuted a couple of winters ago (including during some record-breaking cold spells) that winter bike commuting is *much* warmer than walking to and from and waiting for the T. Bike commuters need good gloves and to double up on socks, but otherwise dress a little lightly for the weather (I left my jacket unzipped a lot) to keep from sweating too much (which is the thing that will make you cold). I left the bike at home on days when the the weather was 0 F and during storms (or before the snow and ice was cleared from them) but those days are actually not all that many out of a whole winter.
aren't limited to freezing cold, however. Ice and potholes can make your trip treacherous. The two worst accidents I ever had happened in the winter, and neither one involved collision with a car.
I've had far fewer mishaps biking on the roads that our tax dollars pay to plow to the curb or nearly so than I have had trying to walk to and from the buses on sidewalks which are not properly cleared because it is left to the property owners who are never ticketed for not clearing them.
I do tend to do more "biking to transit" in the nasty snow/ice than in dry weather, but the reduction in hazard by using the cleared public way is considerable.
The other advantage of "multimodal commuting": if it gets nasty, take the bike on the train (I have a folding bike); if there is T Fail, bike home (I beat the severely delayed express bus on Bruins opening night by just biking home).
I bike until my lungs can't take it - cold-induced asthma usually gets me around 10 F or so with a neoprene balaclava. Keeping warm is the easy part - the hard part is not getting TOO warm and too sweaty underneath it all. Thus I wear layers and put stuff on if I'm too cold, and pull stuff off as I warm up (and the sun comes up). I keep a heavier jacket at work because I'll need it if I go out during the day.
But biking around Boston December-March is a significant barrier to most people. My winter goal is riding 1-2 days a week to take the edge off my T experience.
Artistically nice but logically flawed. She focuses on the extraordinary event of a subway evacuation for her depiction of MBTA use but then contrasts this with a pleasant day out biking. Why not contrast the annoying but relatively safe experience of a subway evacuation with the terrifying and dangerous experience of a biker getting doored, or hit by a car, or contrast the warmth and dryness of the T with the experience of trying to bike to work in a cold driving March rain? Or contrast the effort needed to bike to work with the freedom public transit offers to do something else like read a book or talk to a friend or take a nap. Furthermore, the biking portion of the cartoon shows them leisurely biking along the esplanade, something done more for amusement and exercise than for commuting. After work or on weekends you'll find a lot of people who ride the MBTA enjoying the esplanade on bikes or on foot.
I think the point is that often riding the T isn't a a place to read a book, talk to a friend or take a nap. Just yesterday a friend relayed a tale on the bus that after moving to the back to avoid two homeless people arguing, she had a an angry encounter with a student who had a heavy bag that kept hitting her in the head. She said excuse me, but the student was wearing noise canceling headphones. When she then pushed the bag, the student started yelling at her saying she could have said "excuse me." This is an example of what happens pretty much every day on the T, especially the bus. She was on the #1, btw.
If that's the point then it falls flat too. Biking to work requires all your attention and frequently involves unpleasant things like potholes, falls, hits or near misses with cars and pedestrians, bad weather etc etc etc. Is the T a paradise? No. But the idea that it's some kind of hell hole is silly. I ride the T every day and it's not like ranting homeless people or straphangers with hugely offensive BO are the norm.
"Artistically nice but logically flawed. She focuses on the extraordinary event of a subway evacuation for her depiction of MBTA use but then contrasts this with a pleasant day out biking."
Evacuation of a subway car should be extraordinary, but its becomming common place. I would argue even a crappy day riding beats being trapped in a subway car for hours, especially if you require a bathroom.
"Why not contrast the annoying but relatively safe experience of a subway evacuation with the terrifying and dangerous experience of a biker getting doored, or hit by a car,"
Because these events are extraordinary, and illegal.
"or contrast the warmth and dryness of the T with the experience of trying to bike to work in a cold driving March rain?"
Rain sucks, you either deal with it, or take the t that day, which will also suck thanks to the wet dog smell riders get. You also seem to have forgotten the fun of riding in a car where the ac is broken and you can taste others sweat, busses without heat, and the dripping water on seats.
"Or contrast the effort needed to bike to work with the freedom public transit offers to do something else like read a book or talk to a friend or take a nap."
This is the one thing that keeps me taking the t occasionally, however I would say the times I actually get a seat AND have room to pull out a book are more rare then an on time 66. Don't forget the oppertunity to make friends on the t as they grope you, or hit you with their backpacks and strollers.
"Furthermore, the biking portion of the cartoon shows them leisurely biking along the esplanade, something done more for amusement and exercise than for commuting."
I commute via the esplanade three times a week. I assume so do most of the other cyclists I pass with bags and in work clothes.
"After work or on weekends you'll find a lot of people who ride the MBTA enjoying the esplanade on bikes or on foot."
And on weekdays you find commuters who don't feel like battling with ignorant drivers on comm ave. The esplanade is a viable commuter route from the west for cyclists, to think its not used for that purpose is to think the red line doesn't have to get shut down this winter because its in such terrible shape...
I've taken the MBTA just about evey work day or school day for almost 40 years and have never had to evacuate a train through an emergency exit or tunnel.
Everyone I know who bikes even semi-regularly has at least one experience with an accident, be it a car , a pothole, an ice patch, whatever. Lets survey a local hospital and find out in a typical week how many people are treated for bike riding injuries vs. transit riding injuries.
Ask people who are sick with influenza, colds, etc. what transit options they take, how crowded, etc. Add transit-borne illnesses to the mix. (the ventilation conditions in T cars and crowded buses are sufficent to spread viruses around quite nicely, particularly in crowded conditions).
One of the best ways I protect myself from illnesses(aside from a flu shot) is to avoid contracting frequent colds from being on crowded trains and buses.
We get it already. Cyclists/cycling are/is better than everyone else/other commuting methods in every possible way. I got enough lectures in college, I don't need any more thankyouverymuch.
No, this is just an injury survey. Which mode do you think generates the most accident releated injuries per 100,000 users in one typical week or within a year?
Or at the least not enough that you can recall more then one a year. But you can, and its enough to keep me on my bike "in danger", rather then risk getting trapped on a train. I'm a huge railfan too, but the reliability of the T as of late either keeps me off it entirely, or only when I can add an hour or two of padding to my trip time. Hence why I'm sitting at south station an hour and a half before my train is supposed to leave.
Obviously you're not a huge railfan since you resort to gross distortions in order to paint the T as some kind of hell on wheels. As I've said, the experience of getting doored or clipped or hit is a lot more representative of a bicyclists experience than a tunnel evacuation is of a T rider's. The fact that you CAN remember tunnel evacuations is evidence of their irregularity. They make the news, and blogs like UHub precisely because they are exceptional events that draw attention. If they were everyday events they wouldn't get reported.
I have been biking to work most days for the last four years and have never gotten doored, have never been clipped, and have had one serious close call where I had to throw myself sideways to keep from being hit by a right turning driver, and skinned my knee.
Do I wish that car drivers and people opening their doors were more pleasant and careful of those around them? Of course. But I'm sure that T riders wish there were never aggressive drunks or clueless co-eds or people singing along with their iPods.
I would guess that comparing the frequency of biking annoyances compares to T annoyances about like this; (I'm a very cautious law abiding and pretty experienced cyclist, YMMV)
Having someone have an obnoxious conversation 2' away from you=having a driver behind you either honking, yelling or pressuring you to go faster= once a week.
T is delayed 20 minutes or so=car passes a bit too close, a bit too fast - not too dangerous, but annoying because then they immediately have to slam on their brakes at the stoplight ahead and it seems so pointless. Happens once a month.
Aggressive guy with drug/ alcohol/ mental health issues in your vicinity= having to stop really short because someone is turning across your path (either right or left) - happens twice a year.
T is stopped and you're forced to take a shuttle or a cab= you get caught in drenching rain and are soaked= once a year
Car is disabled and you're stuck in a tunnel and have to be evacuated along the tracks= getting hit or falling off your bike because of a car clipping you very uncommon- maybe once in a decade or more for most users.
As I said, YMMV, and I'm a very cautious rider. But I think that people overestimate the annoyances of unfamiliar methods of transportation and are accustomed or habituated to the annoyances of their normal commute.
I like your breakdown although drenching rains are more common than complete T breakdowns.
But your post really proves my point. You describe yourself as a "very cautious" driver and even you can report a near miss from a car which could have ended disastrously. In contrast virtually no T riders can report experiencing a tunnel evacuation.
Come off it. Tunnel evacuation is "becoming increasingly common"? That's just false. Or at least, it's false to imply, as you and the artist does, that this is a common occurrence. I ride the T every day and have never had to evacuate a train or been near a train that had to be evacuated. I've never been "stuck for hours" either. To argue that such occurrences are representative of the T experience is HIGHLY disingenous.
Getting hit by a door, taking a tumble, and getting hit or nearly hit by a car are all FAR more representative of an urban biker's experience than a tunnel evacuation is of a subway rider's.
As you admit riding in the rain sucks. Yet you continue to have to misrepresent the T riding experience in order to make it seem inferior. Again, I ride the T all the time and the "wet dog" smell isn't something characteristic of the T on rain days when your biggest problem might be wet seats. And neither is broken HVAC which, even if it is true, is still a far step above the complete LACK of HVAC on a bike.
I've got no problem with how anyone chooses to get to work. What I have a problem with is the hegemonic assumption that because YOU love traveling a certain way that we should ALL love doing so and that your chosen mode of transit is inherently superior to all others. I hate that condescending attitude from motorists, who often don't seem to realize any of the down sides of being dependent on a motor vehicle and I hate it from cyclists who think that somehow there's something better about biking that anything else.
The Saturday before last (early Sunday actually) and this past Sunday I was stuck two different times on trains that were stopped for one half hour (one because of a malfunction, the second for a "medical emergency" on the train in front of us). Same line (the B line) too. Corruption (those "repairs" that are supposedly made late at night are not really being done: there's a scandal every couple of years about this but the situation doesn't change), the incompetence and constant lack of planning and lack of funding is catching up with the T. I've been taking the T for thirty years and it is *much* worse now than it's ever been.
The MBTA was much worse in the 1970s than it is today, I say that as someone who was riding it then. I remember talking to a now retired Green Line operator who said new guys on the job in the 70s were always advised to bring their lunch with them by the old time operators, because they never knew when or if they would get back to the carhouse for their break. Derailments were much more common back then.
Ridership dropped to all time lows in the 1970s, it is now at its highest level since the 1940s. If it were always as bad as reflected in the cartoons, the numbers would be lower.
Most of my trips on the T are unremarkable (knock on wood.) There is no way in hell I'm giving up my ride from Cleveland Circle to Copley and vice versa to bike down Comm or Beacon during rush hour. Besides which, I run in the morning so I don't need to bike for exercise.
since i moved here i missed biking very much. but being spoiled with good roads, no pothole, separate bike lanes and car drivers that actually know you are there, im too afraid to bike here.
but, after watching this video; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuBdf9jYj7o&feature...
perhaps there still is a little hope for the US!
Look at the bright side - you can tell your friends/relations from your previous abode that you're getting tougher.
Riding a bike around Boston is like skiing in New England. When you go somewhere else, people who are being honest will compliment you on your technical skills.
Just as any dope can ski in in a wide-open bowl with thigh-deep powder, any nimbo can cycle to work in a temperate climate with good roads, dedicated and protected bike lanes and courteous drivers. It's skiers with eastern hardwood streaks on their ski jackets and helmets (after all, we're not dumb) and worn down ski edges, and bikers who can navigate our old cowpaths and around idiot jaywalking pedestrians that you want to hang with.
Now get out there and distinguish yourself as an excellent and durable cyclist!
perhaps you are right! im just such a sissy..
:)
but the cold is, as another commenter already said, really not that much of a problem, you need good gloves and shoes, and biking will do the rest... its in fact much better than standing at a bus stop, or walking; thats so much colder!
For example, you can actually combine transit and biking. One coworker leaves a beater bike at North Station for that "last mile" problem. I have a folding bike for that same reason. Bikes can go on racks at the front of buses. Carpools can be arranged for the worst days, with a chip-in for parking.
I bike to and from work. I also walk a half mile on each end of an express bus. I also have a folding bike that goes on the express bus with me, or on the commuter rail trains, or on the subway if I have to get somewhere from Alewife, or get to a soccer game in Melrose or Malden, etc. or otherwise rendesvous with the car somewhere. If my husband has to get somewhere downtown, we will sometimes drive and use the express lane. My neighbors sometimes scoop me up so they can use that lane, too. If I'm tired or something on my bike isn't working right (like the time my headset bolt sheared ...), The full size bike will usually fit on the front of an express bus (that took me right to JRA Cycles ...).
I don't see it as "transit versus cycling" - the two are complementary, and sometimes overlap - and sometimes provide needed redundancy. The more options you have, the better off you are in the event of a bike you can't field repair, a sudden spate of bad weather, or a Massive T Fail.
I think we all know about your folding bike, and aside from that, your commuting habits probably overlap with quite a few of us. I bike, I bus, I train, all depending on situation. I very rarely drive. I thought I'd point out that the comic is specifically contrasting two modes of transportation that can/should be synergistic, while the real villain (the car) is nowhere to be found.
The comment was meant as a joke, nothing more, and certainly not requiring a discourse on the morality of multi-modal transportation.
Reading through this list of people's complaints about biking or T riding I begin to think that we should all just pack it up and move to a cabin in the quiet part of Nunavut. Or we could admit that as Bostonians we are the world champions in free-style whining. Wahhh...it's raining and I'm on my bike, cahh driviz ahh arseholes, the fat urine-soaked guy on the train gots BO! ferchrissakes.
But I tell you if I get smacked by one more backpack....
Comments
Repost January 23rd
By Costello, John
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 8:23am
Let's see how good this feels on a 12 degree day.
Actually Bike Commuting Most Dry Winter Days is Quite Warm
By Huge Feminist
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:57am
I was shocked when I first bike-commuted a couple of winters ago (including during some record-breaking cold spells) that winter bike commuting is *much* warmer than walking to and from and waiting for the T. Bike commuters need good gloves and to double up on socks, but otherwise dress a little lightly for the weather (I left my jacket unzipped a lot) to keep from sweating too much (which is the thing that will make you cold). I left the bike at home on days when the the weather was 0 F and during storms (or before the snow and ice was cleared from them) but those days are actually not all that many out of a whole winter.
Hazards of winter biking
By Ron Newman
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:09am
aren't limited to freezing cold, however. Ice and potholes can make your trip treacherous. The two worst accidents I ever had happened in the winter, and neither one involved collision with a car.
The Hazards of Winter Walking
By SwirlyGrrl
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:43am
I've had far fewer mishaps biking on the roads that our tax dollars pay to plow to the curb or nearly so than I have had trying to walk to and from the buses on sidewalks which are not properly cleared because it is left to the property owners who are never ticketed for not clearing them.
I do tend to do more "biking to transit" in the nasty snow/ice than in dry weather, but the reduction in hazard by using the cleared public way is considerable.
The other advantage of "multimodal commuting": if it gets nasty, take the bike on the train (I have a folding bike); if there is T Fail, bike home (I beat the severely delayed express bus on Bruins opening night by just biking home).
Keep a heavier jacket at work ...
By SwirlyGrrl
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:13am
I bike until my lungs can't take it - cold-induced asthma usually gets me around 10 F or so with a neoprene balaclava. Keeping warm is the easy part - the hard part is not getting TOO warm and too sweaty underneath it all. Thus I wear layers and put stuff on if I'm too cold, and pull stuff off as I warm up (and the sun comes up). I keep a heavier jacket at work because I'll need it if I go out during the day.
Fantastic comic
By anon
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 8:32am
But biking around Boston December-March is a significant barrier to most people. My winter goal is riding 1-2 days a week to take the edge off my T experience.
Artistically nice but
By anon
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:06am
Artistically nice but logically flawed. She focuses on the extraordinary event of a subway evacuation for her depiction of MBTA use but then contrasts this with a pleasant day out biking. Why not contrast the annoying but relatively safe experience of a subway evacuation with the terrifying and dangerous experience of a biker getting doored, or hit by a car, or contrast the warmth and dryness of the T with the experience of trying to bike to work in a cold driving March rain? Or contrast the effort needed to bike to work with the freedom public transit offers to do something else like read a book or talk to a friend or take a nap. Furthermore, the biking portion of the cartoon shows them leisurely biking along the esplanade, something done more for amusement and exercise than for commuting. After work or on weekends you'll find a lot of people who ride the MBTA enjoying the esplanade on bikes or on foot.
I think the point is that
By central squared
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:32am
I think the point is that often riding the T isn't a a place to read a book, talk to a friend or take a nap. Just yesterday a friend relayed a tale on the bus that after moving to the back to avoid two homeless people arguing, she had a an angry encounter with a student who had a heavy bag that kept hitting her in the head. She said excuse me, but the student was wearing noise canceling headphones. When she then pushed the bag, the student started yelling at her saying she could have said "excuse me." This is an example of what happens pretty much every day on the T, especially the bus. She was on the #1, btw.
If that's the point then it
By anon
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 12:32pm
If that's the point then it falls flat too. Biking to work requires all your attention and frequently involves unpleasant things like potholes, falls, hits or near misses with cars and pedestrians, bad weather etc etc etc. Is the T a paradise? No. But the idea that it's some kind of hell hole is silly. I ride the T every day and it's not like ranting homeless people or straphangers with hugely offensive BO are the norm.
missing the point
By davem
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:45am
"Artistically nice but logically flawed. She focuses on the extraordinary event of a subway evacuation for her depiction of MBTA use but then contrasts this with a pleasant day out biking."
Evacuation of a subway car should be extraordinary, but its becomming common place. I would argue even a crappy day riding beats being trapped in a subway car for hours, especially if you require a bathroom.
"Why not contrast the annoying but relatively safe experience of a subway evacuation with the terrifying and dangerous experience of a biker getting doored, or hit by a car,"
Because these events are extraordinary, and illegal.
"or contrast the warmth and dryness of the T with the experience of trying to bike to work in a cold driving March rain?"
Rain sucks, you either deal with it, or take the t that day, which will also suck thanks to the wet dog smell riders get. You also seem to have forgotten the fun of riding in a car where the ac is broken and you can taste others sweat, busses without heat, and the dripping water on seats.
"Or contrast the effort needed to bike to work with the freedom public transit offers to do something else like read a book or talk to a friend or take a nap."
This is the one thing that keeps me taking the t occasionally, however I would say the times I actually get a seat AND have room to pull out a book are more rare then an on time 66. Don't forget the oppertunity to make friends on the t as they grope you, or hit you with their backpacks and strollers.
"Furthermore, the biking portion of the cartoon shows them leisurely biking along the esplanade, something done more for amusement and exercise than for commuting."
I commute via the esplanade three times a week. I assume so do most of the other cyclists I pass with bags and in work clothes.
"After work or on weekends you'll find a lot of people who ride the MBTA enjoying the esplanade on bikes or on foot."
And on weekdays you find commuters who don't feel like battling with ignorant drivers on comm ave. The esplanade is a viable commuter route from the west for cyclists, to think its not used for that purpose is to think the red line doesn't have to get shut down this winter because its in such terrible shape...
Wait
By J. Dunne
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:02am
Do you really think between-station T evacuations are more commonplace than bikers getting doored/clipped?
Do the Math
By SwirlyGrrl
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:19am
Even if two or three cyclists get doored in a given week, that takes a lot of weeks to add up to a single, several-hundred person T evacuation.
I've taken the MBTA just
By anon
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:43am
I've taken the MBTA just about evey work day or school day for almost 40 years and have never had to evacuate a train through an emergency exit or tunnel.
Everyone I know who bikes even semi-regularly has at least one experience with an accident, be it a car , a pothole, an ice patch, whatever. Lets survey a local hospital and find out in a typical week how many people are treated for bike riding injuries vs. transit riding injuries.
Research Plan Modification
By SwirlyGrrl
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 1:45pm
Ask people who are sick with influenza, colds, etc. what transit options they take, how crowded, etc. Add transit-borne illnesses to the mix. (the ventilation conditions in T cars and crowded buses are sufficent to spread viruses around quite nicely, particularly in crowded conditions).
One of the best ways I protect myself from illnesses(aside from a flu shot) is to avoid contracting frequent colds from being on crowded trains and buses.
We get it already.
By JeanneM
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 2:18pm
We get it already. Cyclists/cycling are/is better than everyone else/other commuting methods in every possible way. I got enough lectures in college, I don't need any more thankyouverymuch.
No, this is just an injury
By anon
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 2:18pm
No, this is just an injury survey. Which mode do you think generates the most accident releated injuries per 100,000 users in one typical week or within a year?
No, I think they shouldn't
By davem
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:36am
No, I think they shouldn't happen at all.
Or at the least not enough that you can recall more then one a year. But you can, and its enough to keep me on my bike "in danger", rather then risk getting trapped on a train. I'm a huge railfan too, but the reliability of the T as of late either keeps me off it entirely, or only when I can add an hour or two of padding to my trip time. Hence why I'm sitting at south station an hour and a half before my train is supposed to leave.
Obviously you're not a huge
By anon
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 12:46pm
Obviously you're not a huge railfan since you resort to gross distortions in order to paint the T as some kind of hell on wheels. As I've said, the experience of getting doored or clipped or hit is a lot more representative of a bicyclists experience than a tunnel evacuation is of a T rider's. The fact that you CAN remember tunnel evacuations is evidence of their irregularity. They make the news, and blogs like UHub precisely because they are exceptional events that draw attention. If they were everyday events they wouldn't get reported.
biking -T annoyances/ frequency
By cycler
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:57am
I have been biking to work most days for the last four years and have never gotten doored, have never been clipped, and have had one serious close call where I had to throw myself sideways to keep from being hit by a right turning driver, and skinned my knee.
Do I wish that car drivers and people opening their doors were more pleasant and careful of those around them? Of course. But I'm sure that T riders wish there were never aggressive drunks or clueless co-eds or people singing along with their iPods.
I would guess that comparing the frequency of biking annoyances compares to T annoyances about like this; (I'm a very cautious law abiding and pretty experienced cyclist, YMMV)
Having someone have an obnoxious conversation 2' away from you=having a driver behind you either honking, yelling or pressuring you to go faster= once a week.
T is delayed 20 minutes or so=car passes a bit too close, a bit too fast - not too dangerous, but annoying because then they immediately have to slam on their brakes at the stoplight ahead and it seems so pointless. Happens once a month.
Aggressive guy with drug/ alcohol/ mental health issues in your vicinity= having to stop really short because someone is turning across your path (either right or left) - happens twice a year.
T is stopped and you're forced to take a shuttle or a cab= you get caught in drenching rain and are soaked= once a year
Car is disabled and you're stuck in a tunnel and have to be evacuated along the tracks= getting hit or falling off your bike because of a car clipping you very uncommon- maybe once in a decade or more for most users.
As I said, YMMV, and I'm a very cautious rider. But I think that people overestimate the annoyances of unfamiliar methods of transportation and are accustomed or habituated to the annoyances of their normal commute.
I like your breakdown
By anon
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 12:48pm
I like your breakdown although drenching rains are more common than complete T breakdowns.
But your post really proves my point. You describe yourself as a "very cautious" driver and even you can report a near miss from a car which could have ended disastrously. In contrast virtually no T riders can report experiencing a tunnel evacuation.
Come off it. Tunnel
By anon
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 12:41pm
Come off it. Tunnel evacuation is "becoming increasingly common"? That's just false. Or at least, it's false to imply, as you and the artist does, that this is a common occurrence. I ride the T every day and have never had to evacuate a train or been near a train that had to be evacuated. I've never been "stuck for hours" either. To argue that such occurrences are representative of the T experience is HIGHLY disingenous.
Getting hit by a door, taking a tumble, and getting hit or nearly hit by a car are all FAR more representative of an urban biker's experience than a tunnel evacuation is of a subway rider's.
As you admit riding in the rain sucks. Yet you continue to have to misrepresent the T riding experience in order to make it seem inferior. Again, I ride the T all the time and the "wet dog" smell isn't something characteristic of the T on rain days when your biggest problem might be wet seats. And neither is broken HVAC which, even if it is true, is still a far step above the complete LACK of HVAC on a bike.
I've got no problem with how anyone chooses to get to work. What I have a problem with is the hegemonic assumption that because YOU love traveling a certain way that we should ALL love doing so and that your chosen mode of transit is inherently superior to all others. I hate that condescending attitude from motorists, who often don't seem to realize any of the down sides of being dependent on a motor vehicle and I hate it from cyclists who think that somehow there's something better about biking that anything else.
Stopped for a Half Hour on the Tracks Twice in 8 Days
By Huge Feminist
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 1:18pm
The Saturday before last (early Sunday actually) and this past Sunday I was stuck two different times on trains that were stopped for one half hour (one because of a malfunction, the second for a "medical emergency" on the train in front of us). Same line (the B line) too. Corruption (those "repairs" that are supposedly made late at night are not really being done: there's a scandal every couple of years about this but the situation doesn't change), the incompetence and constant lack of planning and lack of funding is catching up with the T. I've been taking the T for thirty years and it is *much* worse now than it's ever been.
The MBTA was much worse in
By anon
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 2:09pm
The MBTA was much worse in the 1970s than it is today, I say that as someone who was riding it then. I remember talking to a now retired Green Line operator who said new guys on the job in the 70s were always advised to bring their lunch with them by the old time operators, because they never knew when or if they would get back to the carhouse for their break. Derailments were much more common back then.
Ridership dropped to all time lows in the 1970s, it is now at its highest level since the 1940s. If it were always as bad as reflected in the cartoons, the numbers would be lower.
More realistic
By Lanny Budd
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:21am
The two bikers in the last panel should have angel wings and be biking on clouds. Maybe holding a harp.
Most of my trips on the T are
By JeanneM
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:27am
Most of my trips on the T are unremarkable (knock on wood.) There is no way in hell I'm giving up my ride from Cleveland Circle to Copley and vice versa to bike down Comm or Beacon during rush hour. Besides which, I run in the morning so I don't need to bike for exercise.
since i moved here i missed
By CaT
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:33am
since i moved here i missed biking very much. but being spoiled with good roads, no pothole, separate bike lanes and car drivers that actually know you are there, im too afraid to bike here.
but, after watching this video; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuBdf9jYj7o&feature...
perhaps there still is a little hope for the US!
Biking in Boston is like skiing in New England.
By issacg
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 2:29pm
Look at the bright side - you can tell your friends/relations from your previous abode that you're getting tougher.
Riding a bike around Boston is like skiing in New England. When you go somewhere else, people who are being honest will compliment you on your technical skills.
Just as any dope can ski in in a wide-open bowl with thigh-deep powder, any nimbo can cycle to work in a temperate climate with good roads, dedicated and protected bike lanes and courteous drivers. It's skiers with eastern hardwood streaks on their ski jackets and helmets (after all, we're not dumb) and worn down ski edges, and bikers who can navigate our old cowpaths and around idiot jaywalking pedestrians that you want to hang with.
Now get out there and distinguish yourself as an excellent and durable cyclist!
perhaps you are right! im
By CaT
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 4:32pm
perhaps you are right! im just such a sissy..
:)
but the cold is, as another commenter already said, really not that much of a problem, you need good gloves and shoes, and biking will do the rest... its in fact much better than standing at a bus stop, or walking; thats so much colder!
Obviously a plot by the auto industry
By HenryAlan
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 1:55pm
They're trying to turn cyclists and transit riders against each other. Don't fall for it!
The best all-around transportation answer
By SwirlyGrrl
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 2:55pm
Develop multiple options.
For example, you can actually combine transit and biking. One coworker leaves a beater bike at North Station for that "last mile" problem. I have a folding bike for that same reason. Bikes can go on racks at the front of buses. Carpools can be arranged for the worst days, with a chip-in for parking.
I bike to and from work. I also walk a half mile on each end of an express bus. I also have a folding bike that goes on the express bus with me, or on the commuter rail trains, or on the subway if I have to get somewhere from Alewife, or get to a soccer game in Melrose or Malden, etc. or otherwise rendesvous with the car somewhere. If my husband has to get somewhere downtown, we will sometimes drive and use the express lane. My neighbors sometimes scoop me up so they can use that lane, too. If I'm tired or something on my bike isn't working right (like the time my headset bolt sheared ...), The full size bike will usually fit on the front of an express bus (that took me right to JRA Cycles ...).
I don't see it as "transit versus cycling" - the two are complementary, and sometimes overlap - and sometimes provide needed redundancy. The more options you have, the better off you are in the event of a bike you can't field repair, a sudden spate of bad weather, or a Massive T Fail.
Sometimes a comment is just a comment
By HenryAlan
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 3:09pm
I think we all know about your folding bike, and aside from that, your commuting habits probably overlap with quite a few of us. I bike, I bus, I train, all depending on situation. I very rarely drive. I thought I'd point out that the comic is specifically contrasting two modes of transportation that can/should be synergistic, while the real villain (the car) is nowhere to be found.
The comment was meant as a joke, nothing more, and certainly not requiring a discourse on the morality of multi-modal transportation.
Inexplicable duplicate
By SwirlyGrrl
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 2:57pm
.
Put on a happy face!
By John-W
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 2:58pm
Reading through this list of people's complaints about biking or T riding I begin to think that we should all just pack it up and move to a cabin in the quiet part of Nunavut. Or we could admit that as Bostonians we are the world champions in free-style whining. Wahhh...it's raining and I'm on my bike, cahh driviz ahh arseholes, the fat urine-soaked guy on the train gots BO! ferchrissakes.
But I tell you if I get smacked by one more backpack....
Driving in Nunavut
By Michael Kerpan
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 3:02pm
Just for fun:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highways_in_Nunavut
Dedicated bike lanes?
By John-W
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 4:09pm
So do they have dedicated dogsled lanes too? And I didn't see anything on their subway system. Muskox sharrows?