Take a look at this subpoena, sent by the Suffolk County District Attorney's office to Twitter for information on people who used certain accounts and hashtags related to Occupy Boston in the days immediately before and after Occupy Boston's eviction from its Dewey Square encampment.
As Barrett Brown reports, one of the hashtags refers to "doxing," the act of releasing database information publicly; two of the user names also refer to people or groups who do that. In October, somebody posted 1,000 member logins for the Boston Police Patrolmen's Association Web site - following a similar eviction of protesters. On Dec. 15, one day after the subpoena was sent to Twitter, somebody used the site pastebin.com to post a list of 40 top Boston Police officials, their home addresses, home phone numbers and, in some cases, spouse's names. The list also has their annual pay, although municipal salaries are public records (see the Herald salary database).
The subpoena became public because Twitter released a copy to at least one of the people holding one of the accounts, who then made it public.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Love the
By Brian Riccio
Sun, 12/25/2011 - 10:51pm
request to keep the subpoena confidential! Yeah, suuure, we won't tell anyone!
bostonherald
By Anonymous
Tue, 12/27/2011 - 3:02am
DA cautioned over Twitter subpoenas
Does the DA
By anon²
Mon, 12/26/2011 - 11:30am
know how twitter even works?
Serious question. Seems they're asking for information on the 2 users but then also put in one general name, and two hashtags. Are they looking for records on everyone who used them?
Color me confused on what exactly they're asking for.
Beats Me
By anon
Mon, 12/26/2011 - 12:56pm
I assume this has to do with the BPD login breach and not OB generally. Any "crimes" the campers committed have already been charged and mostly dismissed, so the subpoenas must have to do with something more serious. But weeding through every tweet with an OB hashtag is going to take a long time unless they have some additional data/evidence to cross reference.
Judges don't have to approve such requests?
By Dan Farnkoff
Mon, 12/26/2011 - 1:53pm
What happens if Twitter says "no"? Doesn't the DA have to prove that it's not just a fishing expedition?
Grand Jury?
By deselby
Mon, 12/26/2011 - 2:29pm
Of course it's a fishing expedition. Twitter can do nothing, then it's up to the DA to try to get a judge to order compliance.
Maybe they have a grand jury convened, maybe it's about the database hacks, maybe there's some more nebulous conspiracy indictment being pursued against organizers of Occupy Boston in general.
Perhaps it's just a routine Thoughtcrime investigation
By Dan Farnkoff
Mon, 12/26/2011 - 2:42pm
Kind of creepy.