Hey, there! Log in / Register

Another Black Lives Matter sign vandalized in Jamaica Plain

Hope Church on Seaverns Avenue in Jamaica Plain with vandalized sign

Marg Zamos-Monteith shows us Hope Central Church on Seaverns Avenue, where a Black Lives Matter sign was defaced the night after a JP Black Lives Matter vigil and four months after a similar banner in front of First Baptist Church on Centre Street was torn down (then replaced).

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

It's not like the vandal drew a swastika on the banner. The perpetrator took an exclusionary comment and made it more inclusive, positive and universal.

up
Voting closed 0

And by defacing the sign, it has made the sign's particular important message negated and irrelevant which is not acceptable. Of course, all lives matter. That is a silly statement. Unfortunately, in the good ole US of A some lives (and, in this case, black lives) matter much less (historically as well as currently) - hence the sign.

(BTW: Deface means to spoil the surface by drawing and/or writing on it or disfiguring the surface. Covers both Nazi symbol placement and/or black magic marker cross outs.)

Cue racist tinged comments countdown in 3, 2, 1....

up
Voting closed 0

Not a countdown.

up
Voting closed 0

n/t

up
Voting closed 0

Do you genuinely believe that the purpose of the "BLACK LIVES MATTER" sign is to advertise that white lives don't matter?

up
Voting closed 0

The sign didn't say "only black lives matter."

You see exclusion because you want to.

up
Voting closed 0

If someone spray paints over the word "Jesus" in the phrase "Jesus Saves" on a lawn sign it's a clear an attack on that person's religion.

So why is it not an attack on that church to do the same thing on a Black Lives Matter sign?

up
Voting closed 0

Do you also support someone who crosses out the word "Breast" on a sign for "Breast Cancer Awareness Month"?

Why should the Breast Cancer Awareness people "exclude" prostate cancer?

up
Voting closed 0

There actually is a huge problem with breast cancer fundraising for a multitude of reasons. From a capitalistic manipulative perspective, there's the issue of pinkwashing, there's the creepy sexualization of a disease where treatment options often involve mastectomies and/or impact sexual function of patients, and on a research end there are issues with unintelligent funding of diseases by need.

To specifically target your breast-vs-prostate example:

Among the big cancers, breast cancer receives the most funding per new case, $2,596 — and by far the most money relative to each death, $13,452. Notably, prostate cancer, the most common cancer, receives the least funding per new case at just $1,318.

So your metaphor is perhaps a bad example, as there are a number of legitimate gripes.

up
Voting closed 0

Ah, so it is OK to cross out the word "Breast" on a sign someone hangs because they are concerned about the condition on the grounds they are mistaken and have been brainwashed into supporting something they shouldn't?

Back to BLM, it's fine if you don't support the movement. It's not OK to try and silence people who support it.

up
Voting closed 0

I responded to your question about if it was appropriate to criticize the breast cancer industry of exclusion of other more serious/common/under-researched cancers (and it is), and I didn't mention signs or vandalism at all in my comment. Hold on, let me reply to your most recent post like you did to me:

Ah, so it is OK to completely disregard cancers that aren't breast cancer, and you're totally fine with patients dying due to lack of industry interest in financing their less-"sexy" disease?

up
Voting closed 0

I never wrote what you attribute to me.

But my point remains: If someone supports one form of cancer study it's likely because they or a friend has that cancer and it's idiotic and/or heartless for you to tell them they are wrong to care about that particular cancer. It's even more moronic to suggest that someone who cares about one type of cancer is unconcerned with another.

There are similarities to your rant against Breast cancer to the rants against BLM signs: If a church has a BLM sign up it's because they are concerned with institutionalized racism against blacks. Even if they take issue with the tactics of some BLM supporters, their acknowledgment of the core problem the BLM movement represents remains true. Conversely, you can dislike the "politics" around Breast Cancer research while still being sympathetic to those facing the illness.

up
Voting closed 0

Why did you leave out the next sentence that funding based on prostate cancer deaths is the second highest, second only to breast cancer deaths funding?

But on a per-death basis it [prostate cancer] ranks second, with $11,298 in N.C.I. funds.

Death rates for prostate and breast cancers are almost the same across the US population: IMAGE(http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/figures/m5939qsf.gif)
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5939a6.htm

Many men develop prostate cancer, but most, over 70%, succumb to it after age 75. Whereas for women who die of breast cancer, over 60% die from it before the age of 75. http://neoneocon.com/2013/05/29/prostate-vs-breast...

Although about 1.7% of prostate cancer death occur in people under 55, a whopping 21% of breast cancer deaths occur under that age. By age 64 the death percentage totals have become 10% for prostate and about 42% for breast. By age 74 it’s 30% for prostate and about 63% for breast. By age 84 it’s 68% for prostate and 84% for breast. The remainders of the deaths occur after the age of 85: 32% for prostate and 16% for breast.

Breast cancer gets more publicized and funded because it kills many women who have decades of life before them. This is vesus prostate cancer which is usually slow growing, and affecting men who were likely to die of other afflictions of old age.

There's a nuance there on why people may fundraise and budget more for breast cancer research. Just as there is nuance on the issues and circumstances that created Black Lives Matter.

up
Voting closed 0

Since the cause of the cancers isn't a question of those who are against cancers. If those who were incarcerated had a high incidence of colon cancer compared to the general population, or if whites were somehow being blamed for giving poor people in Flint, MI some form of Lung cancer, the analogy would make a little more sense.

up
Voting closed 0

Pete, I don't think anyone is trying to take the analogy that far.

The point is that we single out things for more attention/scrutiny/funding all the time for many reasonable concerns. And that telling people their focus is somehow wrong without bothering to consider and address those concerns is at best, ignorance.

up
Voting closed 0

But that's a bad example. A better example would be a group demanding the whole world focuses on something like lassa virus and ignores everything else, and anyone pointing out that cancer kills 100,000 times as many people as lassa virus and requires more attention is immediately crucified as a heartless monster.

up
Voting closed 0

Don't point things out and act like you're being noble if you're not contributing to any solution. Especially if you plan to obstruct any work on other issues.

up
Voting closed 0

Good work, genius. You and your buddy just ended racism by defacing a sign and pretending racism doesn't exist. Why, just as I'm typing this message judges stopped giving longer sentences to black people than white people who committed the same crimes! You did it!

up
Voting closed 0

"Do they vandalize cancer awareness signs w/ 'all diseases matter'?"

up
Voting closed 0

deface
/dəˈfās/
verb
past tense: defaced; past participle: defaced

  • spoil the surface or appearance of (something), e.g., by drawing or writing on it; mar or disfigure.

That's weird! I could have sworn the definition went on to say "however, if you draw or write on something, spoiling the appearance in order to correct it according to your own values and philosophy, or just to be a contrarian douchebag, it's not defacement! Even if it's not your property and you didn't ask permission!"

up
Voting closed 0

"Overnight, after our Ash Wednesday service, someone defaced our Black Lives Matter banner. You can see, someone painted over the word "Black." This is how common racism works, a thousand tiny cuts, an erasure of of existence, a not seeing, a not hearing, a not believing, a not allowing another's life and reality to be central, insisting on one's own place at center. This is why I'm asking you to pray for our people of color today and always - for encouragement and support. But also so we may identify the strength and resilience inside us all, for the living through everyday racism."

Laura Ruth Jarrett

up
Voting closed 0

Crossing out the word Black is not racism.

noun
noun: racism

the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.

The person who did so COULD be racist and believe Blacks are inferior. Or, they could be punk kids who knew this would get on the news. Or, they could be someone who doesn't agree with the BLM movement. Nobody has any idea yet, but to say it's "racism" is just wrong.

up
Voting closed 0

Now go! Go explain your truths to the church! I'm sure if you just show them The Dictionary, they will agree that what happened here is indeed Not Racist and they should just Be Okay with it!

up
Voting closed 0

Because being a pastor absolutely makes someone infallible.

up
Voting closed 0

Because being a pastor absolutely makes someone infallible.

up
Voting closed 0

Sure, and the kids who paint swastikas on the side of schools might be referencing the native american symbol and have absolutely no idea about the other meanings of the symbol.

up
Voting closed 0

Disagreeing with the Black Lives Matter movement, whose mission is to get people to understand that Black lives deserve the same respect as non-Black lives, would in fact be racism.

(And don't EVEN start in with the nitpicky bullshit that someone might understand that racism is a problem and understand that we live in a country in which Black lives are not valued as much as other lives, but take issue with some of the approaches of BLM and would express this by defacing a sign. No, actually, people who understand that racism is a thing are trying to shout it from the rooftops, because so few white people get that racism is a problem. They're not trying to divide themselves from people who might express themselves a bit differently than they do, and they're certainly not defacing signs in a way that any reasonable person realizes IS IN FACT RACIST and is in fact going to cause just about any Black person and just about anyone who loves Black people to feel hurt and anger and fear when they see that someone in their community felt it was OK to do that.)

up
Voting closed 0

I don't agree with the catholic church aiding priests who raped kids, so according to you its cool if I deface any sign that says "catholic"?

up
Voting closed 0

I wonder if this is a reference to Beyonce's performance on Sunday? Many blue likes were upset by it. Are they trying to say "Blue Lives Matter", or maybe they just had blue spray paint? We may never know!

up
Voting closed 0

And all this after the Feds sues the city of ferguson... That idiot that painted the signed should pay more attention to what's going on in dominant black or minorities areas.

up
Voting closed 0

Ferguson is dead broke and can afford to implement what the Feds requested. It a horse and pony show, unless maybe you think Ferguson should have pulled money from other resources like education.

up
Voting closed 0

I try to be positive and talk myself into believing that most people who respond to black lives matter by saying "all lives matter" just don't understand the point of the black lives matter movement. I'm never successful in that pursuit though and I know that a lot of those people are actually just racist.

up
Voting closed 0

People do not realize that it is not so much a racial issue but more of a police mentality issue. The only reason you have more and more of these incidents coming out in the public and more police officers getting in trouble is they are being recorded by cell phones. They used to always get away with he said/she said but now the truth is on film.

up
Voting closed 0

Am I the only one here to see it wasn't defaced by the "Not Art" guy?

up
Voting closed 0

Might I just add, things like BLM, BET, NAACP, etc exist because they need to exist. White people dont need a WhiteEntertainmentTelevision because just about every channel, movie etc is made to their tastes. Mind you, I don't think that's wrong, nor do I think there's anything wrong with anyone who takes pride in their heritage. But a spade is a spade. Personally I think the BLM is pointless and doesn't get to the heart of issues in the black community.

up
Voting closed 0

Black lives in America's history? Not so much.
I'm an old white liberal but far from a whole-hearted supporter of this movement. I like the ends more than the means.

However I find it interesting that this vandalism is being seen in such a racist light.

Without knowing the vandal's intention there is something to be said for changing the statement to be more inclusive.

Isn't the goal to ensure all lives matter?

up
Voting closed 0

Don't deface people's signs.

Make your own. Post them on your property. And no one should deface those, either.

up
Voting closed 0

This country is so heartbreakingly divided. I'm a police officer and I'm often at a loss for words. It's so difficult to go out there daily and remember why I signed up for this in the first place.

We aren't going to make it much longer. That's the conclusion I've reached. After seven years patrolling a tough neighborhood (and not even one of the toughest, when you consider what is happening in Chicago and Baltimore), I've come to the grim termination that America refuses to heal its wounds.

This week alone, a lot of young black men died. A lot of cops did too (http://m.wcvb.com/national/4-us-law-officers-shot-within-days-3-dead/379...).

I hate to be the bearer of bad news. I still try to remember to be kind, have empathy, and yet be tactical and represent the optimy of justice. It's just become so damn hard.

Sincerely,

A Boston cop.

up
Voting closed 0

This will most likely continue. People, right or wrong, fear the police based on the frequency of horror stories you hear on the news. Many people will take the approach of shooting back. Plus we continue to hear stories of police who shoot up the wrong house or shoot some unarmed man. Maybe we should start to highlight the good cops. Whatever happened to Officer Friendly?

up
Voting closed 0

the embarrassment of having to acknowledge that Trump voters live in JP. To think that intolerance may drive a Subaru is upsetting. Oh the humanity!

up
Voting closed 0

Damnit, bulgingbuick, we've been over this like a dozen times. JP hipsters drive Priuses (Prii?) with Elizabeth Warren stickers on them. Camberville hipsters drive Subarus advertising Diesel Cafe. Arlington drivers are in Chevy Volts with "Coexist" stickers, or in one notable case, a 1976 Chevy Vega careening over a sidewalk while attempting to run down a bicyclist.

up
Voting closed 0

friendly vehicles since before hipsters were born. A Prius seat does not accept the bulk of a down LL Bean parka like a Subaru. JP has been out hipping Cambridge since before hipsters self invented and the Subaru has been the go to vehicle of progressives since the Saab wagon went extinct. Cambridge is an intellectual interloper community and JP is a progressive home for life. Arlington does not belong in this conversation and Somerville..well lets just say bicycle.

up
Voting closed 0