Hey, there! Log in / Register

Review finds Boston Latin failed to deal correctly with one racist student; bulk of racist tweets were by out-of-state troublemakers

Boston Public Schools tonight released a summary of a review of how Boston Latin School dealt with seven incidents of racism between November, 2014 and last month:

The review found BLS did not adequately investigate the incident, did not adequately discipline the student, nor take appropriate steps to ensure the support and safety of the targeted student.

In a more detailed report, BPS says:

This incident involved a male student (non-­‐Black) who called a Black female student a racial slur and threatened her with a reference to lynching. BLS administrators disciplined the male student, but failed to notify his parents of the incident or the discipline. They also failed to notify the targeted student’s parents of the incident. The investigation determined that administrators did not apply the school's Code of Conduct or internal practices on progressive discipline appropriately, nor did they take sufficient steps to ensure the support and safety of the targeted student, even when her parents later voiced concerns about the school's response.

According to BPS, most of the racist tweets collected into a binder by two black students and given to school Headmaster Lynne Mooney Teta were, in fact, by racist out-of-staters with no actual connection to the school and pretty poor spelling skills:

Headmaster Lynne Mooney Teta and Assistant Headmaster Sherry Lewis-daPonte reviewed the binder and determined that the most offensive tweets were not written by BLS students.

This investigation confirmed that conclusion, verifying that the most offensive tweets, such as "If you hate us so much Go Bach [sic] to Africa," the use of a racial slur, and "...they feel entitled to special treatment because their great great grandpa was a slave" were written by students enrolled in two different school districts in Illinois. There was no evidence that BLS students retweeted or otherwise disseminated these messages.

Administrators identified four BLS students who wrote what the school determined to be racially insensitive tweets included in the binder, such as, "The only racism left in the media is reverse racism, there is no coverage of black on white violence, only the opposite." Ms. Teta conducted "individualized interventions" with those four students, which included verbal warnings and a conversation about how their conduct reflected on themselves and the school. No further disciplinary action was taken. None of the four students have been involved in any additional reported incidents since the individualized interventions.

BPS adds the review - and complaints by leaders of the Black at BLS protest - are leading to changes in how BLS and the entire district will try to improve their racial climate.

Among the recommendations to improve the climate at BLS, the Office of Equity has asked BLS Headmaster Lynne Mooney Teta and others to institute a racial climate audit before the close of this school year and again next year; immediately launch dialogues on race and ethnicity with the school community, including members of the student social justice organization Black Leaders Aspiring for Change and Knowledge (BLS B.L.A.C.K.); and to work with the district to increase the hiring of Black and Latino teachers for the 2016-2017 school year.

BPS is using the recommendations as an opportunity to reset how it addresses allegations of racism in schools, with school administrators now being asked to report these types of allegations directly to the Office of Equity, which in turn reports directly to Superintendent Chang.

In a statement, School Superintendent Tommy Chang said:

Racial intolerance should never be accepted in any Boston public school. This is deeply personal to me as someone who had similar experiences growing up as an immigrant in the United States. I am fully committed to ensuring that no student should ever feel unsafe in any of our schools. BLS must take a critical examination of itself, in particular around issues of race and culture.

More details on the report.

Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Case closed, let's move on.

up
Voting closed 0

what were the statements?

up
Voting closed 0

From the report actually given to school officials, rather than the press release I originally quoted exclusively. The report doesn't say exactly what slur the student used, but says he coupled it with a reference to lynching, so it probably wouldn't be too hard to figure out. Also, the kid was disciplined, but the school didn't follow up as they should have under BPS policies.

I've also added in some of the details about the tweets, mostly from kids who have trouble with basic spelling at two school districts in Illinois.

up
Voting closed 0

Hi,

Can you clarify? I read this report as an illiterate idiot from Illinois wrote the comment about lynching, not the BLS kid. The BLS kids wrote racially insensitive comments about feeling like the media portrayed reverse racism but not any slurs but your comment seems to state differently. Can you please confirm? Am I reading it wrong?
Also, per the report, it looks like the kids were one of the 267 censured or suspended kids during that one period and that the school did indeed take action, just not enough in terms of education and prevention?

up
Voting closed 0

1) A white BLS student used a slur and a lynching reference in talking to a black BLS student.

2) The Black at BLS students gave Mooney Teta a binder of objectionable tweets. Most came from Illinois. However, four students at BLS also posted stuff that administrators felt required a talking to.

up
Voting closed 0

Thank you for clarifying (and without calling me an undercover racist for asking). I was confused when the report wrote "verifying that the most offensive tweets, such as 'if you hate...'were written by students enrolled in two different school districts in Illinois."

up
Voting closed 0

Once again there are ways individuals like yourself who would like to continually perpetuate ignorance and ugliness of racism. At this point in this latest saga of racism what is the point of knowing what exactly was a racist words or terminologies that were use. Take it for face value it was ugly and sensitive painful and unwarranted. Shake my head an undercover racist.

up
Voting closed 0

You are right, what is the point of knowing who said what. There was no point for an investigation. The fact anybody asks questions must mean they are an undercover racist. Given there was an investigation and it's been all over the newspapers, it would seem knowing who said what was important. So because I didn't understand something Adam wrote compared to the report, because I am actually trying to understand the report, I am definitely racist. You got me. Maybe you need to think about hurtful terminology. I am asking Adam to clarify and confirm what he wrote (the the BLS kid wrote the nasty term) to make sure I am correctly understanding the report. While you may want to call me names (and feel free if it makes you feel better) because clearly you have the right to call people names, it does make a difference to me. You cannot have an open dialogue on race if one cannot ask clarifying questions to better understand a situation. Or does open for you mean only you get to decide what I asked?

up
Voting closed 0

Nothing undercover here. I acknowledge my biases. However as someone who believes in openness and transparency in government I don't like the idea of secret unspecified wrongdoings that we should take for granted. If a student was disciplined for unspecified "un-american" or "unpatriotic" messages folks like you would be up in arms.

up
Voting closed 0

"Racial intolerance should never be accepted in any Boston public school. This is deeply personal to me as someone who had similar experiences growing up as an immigrant in the United States. I am fully committed to ensuring that no student should ever feel unsafe in any of our schools. BLS must take a critical examination of itself, in particular around issues of race and culture."

It is deeply unfair that so many families and children feel unsafe because of racial intolerance in the public schools.

I applaud Tommy Chang's determination to investigate and pursue the matter, and I hope he will address the problems skewing the demographics of Boston Public Schools vis-a-vis the population of Boston, and make a system where every child can feel safe.

up
Voting closed 0

Who use a racial slur absolutely should have been disciplined, but a student having an opinion about racial bias in the media is absolute BS.

Last I checked people are entitled to an opinion and are allowed to voice such weather you agree with it.

up
Voting closed 0

Schools now have anti-bulling policies and this is one of the areas where "opinions" can be gray areas. If your opinion offends someone, it can be taken as a bullying/hazing/racist/sexist etc remark and subject to discipline.

Welcome to 2016 I guess.

up
Voting closed 0

Offends who, the media? It's seems like it's only viewed as offensive when is goes against the progressive narrative.

RIP free speech! 1776 - 2016

And befor someone say it, no I'm am not defending the kid who used hate speech!

up
Voting closed 0

Under what set of circumstances?

up
Voting closed 0

Yes, even trolls who pose as BLS students in order to upset black students and inflame tensions on BLS timelines have free speech rights, but don't mistake this for an expression of thoughtful opinion.

And no one said the jackass schoolkids in Illinois should be arrested. But maybe their school administration or their parents should have a talk with them

up
Voting closed 0

a black student tweeting about "white privilege" or "white supremacy" any less offensive than a white student tweeting about "media bias"?

Maybe its because YOU'RE bias?

up
Voting closed 0

Anyone who believes this case is closed underestimates the voice of the Black Lives Matter Movement

up
Voting closed 0

Oh please do tell. Care to explain what you even mean? Are you going to protest? Entrap someone into being "racist"? Please share

up
Voting closed 0

I agree lets move forward, however lets and never forget how we got to this moment in time regarding this race this situation. Let every Bostonian in every Boston Public School or even every school across New England learned from the lessons of this particular incident. Especially Civic motivated students that brought this ugly situation to light. There are many great lessons that we all can learn and in the future similar experiences. No one is comfortable when dealing with the issues of race poverty or any forms of injustice. It takes great courage to do so.

up
Voting closed 0

Thank you Adam for reporting the facts here.
Read the Globe article and then read the BPS report. Looks like the Globe was really trying hard to paint a very different picture here. One incident out of seven in a school of over 2400 teenagers. Wow!

up
Voting closed 0

Let's not forget that there were seven incidents, it's just that the report found Mooney Teta didn't adequately address one of them. So she's not the horrible racist whom some said needs to be fired, but she and her staff still need to deal with students who do sometimes do/say racist things.

up
Voting closed 0

I wonder if the results of the investigation will be reported nationwide? It seems from the BPS report that BLS is not the overtly racist institution it was made out to be by the media. Yes, there are some morons in the school who say and do stupid, hurtful things but it doesn't sound like it's the majority of students. It is high school and I'm willing to bet there is not one person who got through high school without being hurt at some point by the words or actions of others. Hopefully, this generation of students is better than the last and the next generation of students will be even better than this one in terms of how they treat one another.

up
Voting closed 0

Given the national media attention that was given to this story, it's depressing that it seems to have cone down to one BLS student making slurs against another student. There are without question complicated questions about race that persist in the BPS, at BLS, etc but the reaction to this story seems hyperbolic to me, and certainly the attempt to paint the school and the headmaster and administrators as racist conspirators. Is there no sensible way to talk about these issues without it all boiling down into BLM vs FOX News tweets?

up
Voting closed 0

The racist acts, and the schools response to those acts.

There were 7 racial incidents reported to the School (not including the binder?), and according to the review, the school did not respond properly on 1 of those.

The "binder" had 4 students dealt with, but the review only mentions that "the most offensive" remarks were from out of district. It does not say whether or not some BLS students were involved with these group chats/texts/posts with those from out of state, and it does not say if any of the posts were unable to be identified as coming from BLS or elsewhere.

So in summary, the issue of the school not complying with regulations had to do with 1 instance, but these girls felt threatened/harrassed by 7+4+? instances in total. That in itself is a problem separate from how the school handled them.

up
Voting closed 0

The bullying policy and the code of conduct do not have gray areas as far as procedures go. They are very clear. Young people in schools have less freedom of speech than adults out in the world. The Supreme Court has ruled on this. So, opinions aren't bullying. It doesn't matter what the slur was, the school should have notified parents and taken better steps. I'm glad Tommy Chang is trying to do what's right, but I'm skeptical that there will be much change at BLS.

up
Voting closed 0

If you can't prove someone said something, or if they deny it.

Or what about a private text/group text where someone talks ill about another person, and those texts leak out. Is that bullying?

up
Voting closed 0

This reminds me of McCarthy's famous List.

I have here in my hand a binder of 205 . . . a binder of tweets that were made known to the Headmaster of BLS as being racist and whose authors nevertheless are still studying at Boston Latin School. . . .

up
Voting closed 0

According to BPS, most of the racists tweets collected into a binder by two black students and given to school Headmaster Lynne Mooney Teta were, in fact, by racist out-of-staters with no actual connection to the school and pretty poor spelling skills:

Perhaps you misread Adam's post.

up
Voting closed 0

McCarthy did not, in fact, have a List of Communists in the State Department. He had a laundry list in his hand, which he only pretended was a list of communists

It was a fake document that changed the world.

These young ladies, in their crusade for justice, rhetorically waved about a Binder that did not actually contain what they indicated it did. Hence the comparison.

I wonder if McCarthyism isn't mentioned in schools anymore. It's clear some of its lessons need to be relearned by the younger generation.

up
Voting closed 0

Yes, the vast majority of tweets were from Illinois, but there were comments from four people identified as BLS students. A bit different from McCarthy. Also, they went to the administration with their list, rather than waving it around and naming names in a public forum. So they did the right thing.

up
Voting closed 0

First off, there _were_ a number of actual communists and spies for the Soviet Union in the government at the time of McCarthy, just like there were a few actual racist tweets by BLS students in the Binder.

Second, McCarthy did not name names - refused to name names - because he didn't actually _have_ any names to name. The piece of paper he waved about was a laundry list. He bullied other people into naming names.

McCarthy's crusade definitely lead to the removal of some actual Soviet spies from the government, but it also ruined the lives of many innocent people and had a chilling effect on free speech and liberty in America.

I do not support it in any incarnation.

up
Voting closed 0

It says the two most offensive tweets were from a school district in Illinois, it does not say how many tweets there were total, only that 4 BLS kids were "spoken to", and not disciplined for insensitive tweets.

And the students did make a youtube video, which can have powerful consequences (as would rattling off names of communists on TV). This part was not discussed in the report. Were the complaintants advised that the binder was investigated and that 4 students were spoken to? Were they told that some tweets were from other states? Does BLS have to tell them that (I would think they should have)?

It appears that the report says that BLS did handle the binder appropriately, but that the school system itself did not follow up with BLS to see if they continued to come up with plans to have a schoolwide/fullday discussion (the recommendation by the district), in which Teta asked for help with but did not get a response.

up
Voting closed 0

"Go Bach to Africa" could be a name for a band. Anybody want to start a band?

up
Voting closed 0

IMAGE(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/612lTrU%2B1QL._SX355_.jpg)

Lambarena: Bach to Africa - An Homage to Albert Schweitzer

up
Voting closed 0

With the finding of this review, according to the Boston Herald. The Herald didn't say how White,Asian,Latino or Native American leaders felt about it.

up
Voting closed 0