Even in Copley Square, Trump has supporters

Even Snopes is now considered too liberal to be an honest broker.

...given the candidate, I'd say it's more of a shart.

if you vote for Stein or Johnson--you'll get Trump or Clinton.

http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/noam-chomsky...

Another point of disagreement is not factual but involves the ethical/moral principle addressed in 1), sometimes referred to as the “politics of moral witness.” Generally associated with the religious left, secular leftists implicitly invoke it when they reject LEV on the grounds that “a lesser of two evils is still evil.” Leaving aside the obvious rejoinder that this is exactly the point of lesser evil voting-i.e. to do less evil, what needs to be challenged is the assumption that voting should be seen a form of individual self-expression rather than as an act to be judged on its likely consequences, specifically those outlined in 4). The basic moral principle at stake is simple: not only must we take responsibility for our actions, but the consequences of our actions for others are a far more important consideration than feeling good about ourselves.

- Noam Chomsky (my emphasis)

There are at least a couple of things that I take issue with Jill Stein on, however:

A) Her positions on an appropriate solution for the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian debacle; She's in favor of a one-state solution, while i believe that the two-state solution (i. e. Israel pulling her troops and right-wing Jewish settlers out of West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem and allowing the Palestinians in those territories to create their own independent, sovereign, Palestinian-majority State.) is the safest, sanest and most sensible and practical solution to the Israelii-Palestinian debacle.

B) Unlike me, Jill Stein is anti-vaccine, which, imho, is a very dangerous position, because it endangers people, and presents a true-blue public health issue, if one gets the drift.

The people panicking about Donnie little hands are the same people that realize they bet on the wrong horse and now they're looking for an excuse. "Campaigning in the wrong state", "they will steal the election", "main stream media bias"...

for a Palin-esque "I can see my penthouse from here!" moment from Il Douche when he's campaigning down in Fairfield County.

That said, I am 100% in favor of his quixotic tefforts in New England. Go get those 2 electoral votes in Maine, Donald! Throw all your money at Connecticut and its rich meaty six EVs. Keep on campaigning in Massachusetts, so you can keep the margin of defeat below 30 points. Don't worry your pretty little head about Virginia, Florida, Ohio, or North Carolina, which you're presently poised to lose by double-digits. Certainly don't concern yourself with something silly like Mississippi, Arkansas, and Texas (!) showing you polling within the margin of error.

everybody here in the United States will really be at each other's throats.

A) All the old religious, ethnic and racial and class hatreds that have occurred or still do occur here in the United States will be re-kindled with a vengeance, and the constantly-occurring racial/religious hatreds will be even more intensified. Americans of every race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation, regardless of color, will be at each other's throats with a vengeance., including even the various white European American ethnic/religious groups in this country (i. e. Irish vs. the Italians, Catholics vs. Protestants, Jews vs. non-Jews, etc.), the rich vs. the poor, etc..

But who's counting?