The Board of Appeal today approved a total of 27 new residential units across East Boston. Because none are in projects of 10 or more units, all can be sold at market or luxury rates, with no units designated for people making less than the median income.
In a sign of political changes to come in the neighborhood, though, incoming City Councilor Lydia Edwards, who takes office in January, opposed two of the projects supported by outgoing Councilor Sal LaMattina.
The most contentious project of the day was Charles DiPrima's plan to replace a single-family home at 84 Faywood Ave. with a four-story, three unit condo building. LaMattina, who lives nearby, supported the proposal; Edwards opposed it.
Although it would be bracketed by two three-unit buildings - one built in 1900, the other under construction - a number of residents on Faywood and Beachview Rd. said they were worried about the precedent being set, that out-of-town developers would begin to swoop in and buy up other single-family homes in the only part of the neighborhood zoned for them and destroy the bucolic, kids-on-bikes atmosphere they moved there for.
"It's a section of the city that looks a lot like Medford and Belmont and Arlington," Beachview Road resident Joseph Arangio said. "It's why people moved there."
Another Beachview resident, Eric Roberts, who lives with his wife and two daughters, said the city needs housing for families with more than just two people in them. But once a single-family home is replaced with condos - which he predicted would start happening if the board approved the project, "it'll be gone forever." Other residents argued DiPrima's need to make more money did not constitute the sort of hardship that would be required for the board to grant variances for the project.
LaMattina and other supporters, however, said the house is the only single-family house left on that stretch and that DiPrima is a local developer doing quality work - and adding more housing stock to a neighborhood in desperate need of it.
The spectre of out-of-town developers destroying what's good about East Boston also came up during a hearing on a proposal to build a four-story, seven-unit building with six parking spaces on what are now two vacant lots at 90 Cottage St., between Maverick and Everett streets.
"Our neighborhood is being taken away from us," neighbor Brenda Gorovitz, whose grandparents bought the house she lives in in 1902, told the board.
The board voted in favor.
Also winning approval:
- A four-story, nine-unit condo building on what is now a vacant lot at 80 Marginal St. Diane Modica, who lives across the street, says she's glad something is finally being built on what has been empty space since at least the 1920s, but said at 45 feet tall, it's out of character with the neighborhood. This was the other project on which LaMattina and Edwards differed.
- A four-story, six-unit building with six parking spaces on a site now occupied by a single-story commercial building at 67 Lubec St.
- The conversion of a triple decker at 189 Trenton St. into a six-unit building.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
East Boston Housing
By mass & main
Tue, 11/28/2017 - 4:34pm
Cambridge has a new project being built on the edge of Central Square. The project will contain 308 housing units of which 20% will be affordable.
Again,
By whyaduck
Wed, 11/29/2017 - 9:55am
what does "affordable" mean? Does it mean that your monthly rent will be no more than 30 percent of ones income? And will there be a lottery for those that are affordable? And what are the income restrictions. Many folks make too much to try for one via the lottery but not enough to afford the market rates. Ha, good luck with that.
Too much,
By anon
Tue, 11/28/2017 - 4:46pm
Too much,
Too many people,
Too much,
Too many people,
Too much,
Too many people....
Use top-of-the-line flame retardant materials.
Calcutta
By SwirlyGrrl
Tue, 11/28/2017 - 6:34pm
People from India consider this level of build out to be a suburban development.
Americans don't even begin to scratch the surface of too much/too many people.
Any wagers?
By Boston_res
Tue, 11/28/2017 - 4:57pm
On how many will go straight to short-term rentals like Airbnb?
Eastie is over.
By ChrisInEastie
Tue, 11/28/2017 - 5:44pm
.
Pushing families further out of the City
By anon
Tue, 11/28/2017 - 7:21pm
There hasn't been many developments with affordable units. The continuation of killing the low and middle class of the City by the Administration.
Not quite
By adamg
Tue, 11/28/2017 - 8:58pm
Every development of more than 10 units has to have at least 13% of the units set aside for people making under the area median income - or pay into a city fund that goes to develop or set aside units for such folks.
Whether the AMI is the best metric to use (given how high it is in the Boston area, a lot of people might still be unable to afford the units) or whether 13% is enough is another question, but it's not like there's no affordable housing being built in Boston, given how many large developments we've been seeing.
So why'd I go with the headline? Because it hit me, after sitting through all these hearings (granted, in the comfort of our dining room, since I knew it would be on the city TV system and so avoided going downtown) that if all 27 units were in a single project, the developers would have had to include 3 or 4 affordable units. But since they were scattered around and not part of a single project, the city got no affordable units out of the deal, um, deals.
I swear these politicians are
By anon
Tue, 11/28/2017 - 9:17pm
I swear these politicians are being paid under the table to approve all these luxury condos. Look at Fenway, doesn’t even look the same anymore. Luxury condos left and right. Whatever happened to affordable housing? The politicians here seem to be catering to the 1% more than the Republican Party!!
Go to the OCPF web site and
By Donna F
Wed, 11/29/2017 - 2:18pm
Go to the OCPF web site and see who's donating to your local politicians. LaMattina's anointed successor took in a bundle from developers and is still showing up at zoning hearings, presumably in his City capacity. LaMattina did pretty well in that department himself though restaurant owners were also quite generous. And Marty Walsh - over the top!
Normally I'd be all for build
By anon
Wed, 11/29/2017 - 1:02pm
Normally I'd be all for build up but if you look at street view, the entire neighborhood really is moderate sized two families with the SINGLE exception of the triple decker next door - which sticks out and looks really weird. To say DON'T MOVE TO THE CITY IF YOU DON'T WANT CITY LIVING is fair - but this is a suburb, built like a suburb, so that's not what these people did.
Pages
Add comment