Walsh tries to get kids ready for Santa as parents protest behind him.
West Roxbury's usually festive Christmas-tree lighting at Washington and Grove streets turned a little more serious today as parents protested Boston Public Schools' plans for earlier start times at many elementary schools.
Before the mayor and Santa arrived, City Councilor Matt O'Malley (West Roxbury, Jamaica Plain) said he would join Councilor Michelle Wu (at large) in voting against the entire school budget this spring if the plans are not changed or if BPS doesn't put the plans on hold for a year to get them right.
Santa arrived in a firetruck and got out in a crowd of protesters:

When Mayor Walsh arrived, he followed his usual routine of shaking hands, posing for photos and high-fiving kids, but this time he also had to plead with parents to give the school department more time this week to listen to them at a series of meetings across the city - starting Monday at the Roche Community Center in West Roxbury.
Walsh said the meetings will help him and Superintendent Tommy Chang figure out what to do about starting times, changed partly to let high-school kids get to school later, partly to reduce the number of elementary kids getting out after 4 p.m. and partly to save money by increasing the number of routes buses in the system can do from three to four.
Walsh said among the options is the one favored by many of the parents he talked to: A year-long moratorium on any schedule changes, to let BPS better take into account the impact on many families - and any changes that might come from changing the overall grade configurations of Boston schools.

Walsh said he appreciated the passion of the parents, said the School Committee only approved the idea of new start times after numerous meetings at schools around the city, said many parents actually support the plans but are reluctant to go public, but acknowledged not all parents were at the meetings. When the School Committee approved the shakeup, it did not have specific schedules in hand - those were only created by a bank of MIT computers after the vote.


At least one parent Walsh spoke to said she also knows other parents reluctant to speak out, because English is not their first language, and that there are even more parents upset about earlier start and end times for elementary kids, which would seriously disrupt their days.
Parents told Walsh they never got the sense school officials much listened to them - especially if they have kids at different schools - and said the calls for parent participation were only in English.
Protesters did not chant and kids still got to sit on Santa's lap.
Sign referring to an NAACP statement:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Reread my comment
By Anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 10:03am
My kids take the bus to school.
Reread my comment.
By Anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 10:09am
My kids take the bus.
Reread the comment thread
By anon
Tue, 12/19/2017 - 9:07am
Nobody was asking you.
Nobody was asking you.
Nobody was asking you.
They were asking the child-free non-Boston person who thinks that her car gives her special rights.
Sorry.
By Anon.
Tue, 12/19/2017 - 10:17am
I thought it was directed at me. And definitely didn't mean to duplicate the post. My apologies.
Irony
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 9:32am
Have you heard of it?
I guess not.
Here's a sampling of these Parents
By Anon.
Wed, 12/20/2017 - 8:05am
Matt Cregor- Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights, (formerly of NAACP) Hernandez Parent- co-author of the LCCR/NAACP Letter
Johannah Haney- Reporter- WBUR (Manning Parent)
Rep. Ed Coppinger- Lyndon Parent
Sen. Mike Rush- Lyndon Parent
Erin Birmingham Anadu- Lawyers and Lyndon Parents
Tigran Eldred
There are plenty more I can list, but these are some of the more vocal ones. The privilege is staggering. Need any more clues why this is getting so much press? Also note the low turnout at meetings last night. But keep letting yourself be gaslighted.
Then you have the regulars who are always advocating for BPS, who, even though I don't always agree with, I honestly think care about all children in BPS. These two groups are currently working together. Don't worry, the rich folks are gonna get their way and drop the advocates like a bad habit.
Never change, Boston.
in parent mtgs across Boston it's mostly 2 hours of opposition
By Anonymous
Fri, 12/22/2017 - 4:07am
44 out of 125 schools have been scheduled to start before 7:30 AM. At least 2 dozen of these would be starting two hours earlier. With this schedule, for every kid who has an after-school program you have a kid who has an after-school problem. No one coordinated with after-school programs. An 11 hour day for K-2 is too long. It's typically women and children who would have to make this longer day work. The mayor said they have not been able to demonstrate cost savings. He has said the new bus schedule would allow him to put bus budget savings in the classroom. When they realized after-school programs would be two hours longer he said they'd take the bus savings and spend it on after-school. For some reason, he's stuck on having 44 schools start before 7:30 and all the rationale for it keeps falling apart.
We have a volunteer
By anon
Fri, 12/22/2017 - 9:04am
I suppose you will provide free care for the special needs child while his/her parents attend the meeting.
Right?
What bothers me
By Cait
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 8:27am
The question that I keep coming up against is "this is what gets people to school board meetings?" BPS has other massive problems including an achievement gap, facilities that are badly in need of updating, inequitable distribution of good schools across the city, and (one of my favorite things to complain about) really poor food service, among others. But a change to the school day is what gets people into the streets?
Seriously, I don't understand. BPS parents should be fighting mad all of the time, but I guess it's only when a change might affect your own school (and in this case, a WR school) that you pretend to care about inequities.
I suspect, next year when the MCAs scores come up showing a achievement gap, or 5 schools poor neighborhoods are shown to be failing, these same people will be tucked up nicely in their houses, reading the Globe, doing nothing.
Sort of ridiculous.
By Dan Farnkoff
Tue, 12/19/2017 - 12:13am
A lot of the middle schools already start at 7, don't they? Where were all the protests for those poor suffering early risers and their oppressed families? What's with all this exaggerated, sanctimonious drama? This sort of self-centered parochial "passion" is a bit reminiscent of the old busing protests, if anything.
Nailed it!
By Anon.
Tue, 12/19/2017 - 7:13am
NFT.
Pages
Add comment