The Crimson reports that Cambridge's two larger institutions of higher education are selling their edX portal to some for-profit concern and that they'll use the money to build a new non-profit aimed at improving the online educational experience, in particular for "under-resourced and historically disadvantaged populations."
Neighborhoods:
Topics:
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
I love how they use
By anon
Tue, 06/29/2021 - 4:12pm
I love how they use "educational experience" as opposed to "education degree" . Harvard and MIT are the biggest group of NIMBYs I've ever seen. All about feeding their rich fat mouths with more money.
Why not
By Deezak
Tue, 06/29/2021 - 4:33pm
Why not just make the current online lecture-video library totally free and accessible to "under-resourced and historically disadvantaged populations"?
Save time, cut out the middle man - they don't need the $800M.
It's not the library
By JonT
Tue, 06/29/2021 - 5:15pm
Headline is misleading. edX isn't a library, its a platform for taking online courses, and it has other content providers besides Harvard and MIT.
Well this is the shittiest
By _Sean
Tue, 06/29/2021 - 7:28pm
Well this is the shittiest news of the day. Two rich-beyond-belief colleges did a great thing and made some of their courses available for anyone, anywhere in the world with an internet connection. They built their platform and expanded it over years (possibly even a decade).
Then they decide "screw it" our $42 billion (Harvard) & $18 billion (MIT) endowments aren't big enough, so let's sell and make some $$$! Oh, and let's definitely try to redirect anger by claiming the company is purchasing it for "historically disadvantaged populations". Ya know, the same group of people who, until today, had FREE access to all our online courses.
Article explaining what's happening
By mg
Tue, 06/29/2021 - 5:37pm
https://news.mit.edu/2021/mit-harvard-transfer-edx...
FAQ
https://news.mit.edu/2021/mit-harvard-transfer-edx...
Letter from MIT's president
https://president.mit.edu/speeches-writing/new-fut...
Thank you!
By MassMikMouse
Tue, 06/29/2021 - 6:25pm
Nice to see a clear explanation.
What is happening to edX
By Nowy Liberté
Tue, 06/29/2021 - 5:59pm
Rather than just commenting on rumors -- try at least reading up on what has transpired [subject to approval by authorities such as MA Attorney General's Office]
The most important highlights besides the $800M which goes back into funding a new to be newly named Nonprofit entity which will be doing what MIT has been doing since OpenCourseWare began -- except on "Steroids":
Here's the link to an FAQ provided by MIT
https://news.mit.edu/2021/mit-harvard-transfer-edx...
Yeah, Adam, the headline
By Kathode
Tue, 06/29/2021 - 7:18pm
is misleading. They are selling the platform they built but not the contents. The schools retain the contents. EdX as a non-profit couldn't financially keep up with other well financed educational technology companies that are churning out so much online learning.
Headline changed
By adamg
Tue, 06/29/2021 - 7:52pm
Thanks.
Item 6
By Daan
Thu, 07/01/2021 - 12:15pm
In the FAQS Item 6 may be a very telling explanation of the sale.
That sounds like a nice way of saying that edX is not profitable and none of the contributing universities (including other wealthy places such as Georgetown U) are willing to subsidize the edX.
Promises that boil down to an implied new and improved are like promises of a customer to a sales rep. They don't mean anything unless the money is actually on the table. Will the purchase price of $800 million actually go to a new and improved online educational platform?
Consider Harvard's Widener Library building. It's various expansions have required some fancy thinking.
Whether Edx remains, whether Harvard and MIT actually create a new and improved online educational platform fit the IT concept of vaporware until the commitments are fulfilled.
Add comment