Why is a self-storage facility incompatible with practice space? How does the rent per square foot compare?
Before MIT closed the Metropolitan Rage Warehouse (Ire Proof), there was a guy who rented a storage room for his grand piano, and he would often come by to practice.
In theory there's little difference between self-storage and music rehearsal, but in practice and in the actual case of the rooms Stor-U-Self/RJ Kelly has been building out in this specific location, the self-storage units can't be used for most music activities. The self-storage units are not sound-proofed, and they're too small to set up a drum kit and several amps for a band with enough space left for people to play them. They also don't have enough power supply for multiple amplifiers. A single solo musician could probably rent a storage unit and practice piano in there by themselves without issue, but a band is much bigger and louder; 20 bands practicing all at the same time on the same floor, as they do in CRS now, would simply not be feasible. The only activities that would really work (practicing keyboard or electronic drums w/ headphones, music production and mixing w/ headphones, etc.) can be done in people's own apartments and don't require dedicated facilities.
The storage units are much smaller than the existing rooms, and rent for 2-3x more per square foot. It's likely that building insurance is also cheaper for self-storage vs. music rehearsal. Still, if the only difference were cost, it would be annoying but the musicians would figure out a way to pay for it. Unfortunately the problem is much bigger than that.
Because the wealth from the Los Angeles donors giving the resources to support local up and coming musicians are already a huge success in the music industry. Same with New York. Ernie Boch, Jr. - help us!!
that our culture can support music, from the ground up, any more. everything that is "made" now is made by a microchip, our job, is not to understand it but to blindly consume it, whatever it is. all money gets funneled up, and while we in the former working class accuse each other of sundry tribal problems, while serious, seem to somehow aid in helping us be blind to a larger problem: we are growing a class of technocrats that already seek to wield too much control over us, and appear to be just barely tolerating democracy.
perhaps a lot of you can't yet see just how likely is dystopia, at some point, granted perhaps not this quarter. oh well.
Wait, we're "losing" musicians to LA and NYC because of something like this? Those places are insanely expensive too but are gigantic. And they happen to be where the entertainment biz is centered. Ridiculous comment regardless of how much of a bummer this is.
SUM is great, but it's already full (as is Studio 52). There simply is not enough space there for the musicians being displaced. Losing CRS specifically is a bummer, but the issue we're trying to get people to understand is that, without CRS and the Sound Museum, Studio 52 is the only rehearsal complex left in the entire city. SUM and 52 are not getting larger and they simply cannot fit any more tenants. Musicians tend to be a bit transient and are used to moving around, but at this point there's nowhere left to go. We're reaching the end of the line.
Also, my understanding is that SUM rents hourly and offers gear storage separately. Sound Museum and CRS offer monthly leases for dedicated, secure space, which is slightly different.
SUM offers practice spaces of different sizes for monthly rent, as well as by the hour. Studio 52 used to offer this before they moved into a former storage facility.
I also find it hilarious that two of the Boston music references are bands that formed 30-40+ years ago. There is so much music happening in this city, but Boston does not value current artists. They would rather rest on their laurels and gripe about how Aerosmith was the best band to come out of here.
Rehearsal space tenants in the Charlestown building are partnering with the ArtStaysHere Coalition to form a Tenants Association in an effort to stay in our building. For more info you can sign up at the link here: bit.ly/musicstaysincharlestown
Comments
The relentless pursuit of
The relentless pursuit of profit is making it increasingly impossible for artists to live and work in this city and that’s a loss for all of us.
Why is a self-storage
Why is a self-storage facility incompatible with practice space? How does the rent per square foot compare?
Before MIT closed the Metropolitan Rage Warehouse (Ire Proof), there was a guy who rented a storage room for his grand piano, and he would often come by to practice.
In theory there's little
In theory there's little difference between self-storage and music rehearsal, but in practice and in the actual case of the rooms Stor-U-Self/RJ Kelly has been building out in this specific location, the self-storage units can't be used for most music activities. The self-storage units are not sound-proofed, and they're too small to set up a drum kit and several amps for a band with enough space left for people to play them. They also don't have enough power supply for multiple amplifiers. A single solo musician could probably rent a storage unit and practice piano in there by themselves without issue, but a band is much bigger and louder; 20 bands practicing all at the same time on the same floor, as they do in CRS now, would simply not be feasible. The only activities that would really work (practicing keyboard or electronic drums w/ headphones, music production and mixing w/ headphones, etc.) can be done in people's own apartments and don't require dedicated facilities.
The storage units are much smaller than the existing rooms, and rent for 2-3x more per square foot. It's likely that building insurance is also cheaper for self-storage vs. music rehearsal. Still, if the only difference were cost, it would be annoying but the musicians would figure out a way to pay for it. Unfortunately the problem is much bigger than that.
Because the wealth from the
Because the wealth from the Los Angeles donors giving the resources to support local up and coming musicians are already a huge success in the music industry. Same with New York. Ernie Boch, Jr. - help us!!
I really don't know
that our culture can support music, from the ground up, any more. everything that is "made" now is made by a microchip, our job, is not to understand it but to blindly consume it, whatever it is. all money gets funneled up, and while we in the former working class accuse each other of sundry tribal problems, while serious, seem to somehow aid in helping us be blind to a larger problem: we are growing a class of technocrats that already seek to wield too much control over us, and appear to be just barely tolerating democracy.
perhaps a lot of you can't yet see just how likely is dystopia, at some point, granted perhaps not this quarter. oh well.
It's already here, mainstream
It's already here, mainstream art has been almost completely subsumed by machine learning.
Join the art army.
Join the art army. #ArtStaysHere
What a loss
.
LA and NYC
Wait, we're "losing" musicians to LA and NYC because of something like this? Those places are insanely expensive too but are gigantic. And they happen to be where the entertainment biz is centered. Ridiculous comment regardless of how much of a bummer this is.
Ouch
This one has got to hurt.
Tearing it down to be come a SELF STORAGE place?
Boy that landlord must think he's in for a gravy train if he wants to do this.
what the fuck are we doing planning board? Self Storage places? IN THE CITY? That sh*t is for the burbs and you know it.
Cash
Or check - the owner accepts both, buy the property and do as you please with it.
As for self storage it makes perfect sense - not much space to store stuff when 800sqft is a mansion.
Huge population that have no
Huge population that have no other place to store their belongings.
It's already 2/3 storage
It's already 2/3 storage space with 3 floors of rehearsal space.
And with the going rates for those units it would end up making them more money.
SUM Studios in Malden
Check it out. It's far superior to even CRS, which was the best of the bunch.
SUM is great, but it's
SUM is great, but it's already full (as is Studio 52). There simply is not enough space there for the musicians being displaced. Losing CRS specifically is a bummer, but the issue we're trying to get people to understand is that, without CRS and the Sound Museum, Studio 52 is the only rehearsal complex left in the entire city. SUM and 52 are not getting larger and they simply cannot fit any more tenants. Musicians tend to be a bit transient and are used to moving around, but at this point there's nowhere left to go. We're reaching the end of the line.
Also, my understanding is that SUM rents hourly and offers gear storage separately. Sound Museum and CRS offer monthly leases for dedicated, secure space, which is slightly different.
SUM offers practice spaces of
SUM offers practice spaces of different sizes for monthly rent, as well as by the hour. Studio 52 used to offer this before they moved into a former storage facility.
I also find it hilarious that two of the Boston music references are bands that formed 30-40+ years ago. There is so much music happening in this city, but Boston does not value current artists. They would rather rest on their laurels and gripe about how Aerosmith was the best band to come out of here.
CRS Tenants Association
Rehearsal space tenants in the Charlestown building are partnering with the ArtStaysHere Coalition to form a Tenants Association in an effort to stay in our building. For more info you can sign up at the link here: bit.ly/musicstaysincharlestown