US Rep Ayanna Pressley (D-7th) and US Sen. Elizabeth Warren pretty immediately endorsed Kamala Harris for president today:
Pressley tweeted:
Thank you for your dedicated service President Joe Biden.
And Kamala Harris, I’m all in, let’s go.
US Sen. Elizabeth Warren endorsed Harris as well:
She is a proven fighter who has been a national leader in safeguarding consumers and protecting access to abortion. As a former prosecutor, she can press a forceful case against allowing Donald Trump to regain the White House. We have many talented people in our party, but Vice President Harris is the person who was chosen by the voters to succeed Joe Biden if needed. She can unite our party, take on Donald Trump, and win in November.
US Sen. Ed Markey agreed:
Kamala Harris is battle-tested and ready to serve. She will galvanize voters and make history on Election Day. All in for Kamala.
Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-4th) is ridin' with Harris as well.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Obtuse?
By lbb
Tue, 07/23/2024 - 11:51am
Normal people aren't up to speed on all the bit players in your little cult, usually againsty self-parody.
Is it my fault
By Will LaTulippe
Tue, 07/23/2024 - 7:03pm
That I'm better than most everyone else on Googling ballot access and sample ballots before I go vote?
Is it my fault
By lbb
Wed, 07/24/2024 - 10:20am
That I don't bother to keep up to speed with the candidates of crackpot parties?
For the record, I'm also unaware of which offices Shiva Ayyadurai is running in 2024. Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.
If you don't keep up to speed
By Will LaTulippe
Wed, 07/24/2024 - 2:16pm
With the candidates of crackpot parties, then I'm left wondering why you know anything about the GOP at all.
Nice
By spin_o_rama
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 1:31pm
Reductive and tribal.
And then there was a debate
By Ari O
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 1:42pm
All Biden had to do was come into the debate and give a SOTU-like performance.
He failed to clear a pretty low bar, and failed quite spectacularly.
The thing is … Biden may well be fine. The thing about a president is it matters less exactly what words they say in what order and more what they do. But someone who is 82 and has been in a very stressful job for four years … yeah, they might not want to do another four. It probably shouldn't have taken Biden this long to figure it out.
Stunning news
By Sock_Puppet
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 7:37am
Democrats in array
Time to estimate them
By Plen-T-Pak
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 10:32pm
.
A sitting VP is always the worst possible choice
By necturus
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 9:00am
The only sitting VP to win a Presidential election recently was George H.W. Bush (1988). Before Bush, you have to go all the way back to Martin Van Buren (1838).
Al Gore lost in 2000. Hubert Humphrey lost in 1968. Richard Nixon lost in 1960. Even Bush would have lost in 1988 had Dukakis not run a truly execrable campaign.
Either Gavin Newsom or Gretchen Whitmer would be a far better choice than Harris.
This is shaping up to be a re-run of 1968, when Lyndon Johnson suddenly quit the race in favor of Humphrey. Even the calendar is identical.
This is the last summer of America as we've known it. Enjoy it while it lasts.
This is shaping up to be a re
By Rob
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 9:10am
Incorrect.
Yes, there are some similarities to 1968.
However, LBJ made his announcement in late March. Also, the primary calendar started later back then than it does now.
Other differences from 1968
By Irma la Douce
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 9:55am
1968: Multiple viable contenders after the primary process, brokered convention.
Humphrey severely hampered by association with Johnson’s Vietnam War.
Chaotic violence on the streets (and in the hall) during convention, drove voters to alleged “law and order†candidate.
2024: All signs indicate convention delegates are prepared to unite for Harris, whatever interim process is implemented.
Zero enthusiasm for non-registered democrat Joe Manchin.
Harris associated with incredibly impactful administration.
Roe, Bitches.
And, I don’t agree with Van
By Frelmont
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 2:40pm
And, I don’t agree with Van Jones’s ‘68/‘24 comparison likening Gaza to Vietnam.
Not the primary calendar
By necturus
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 10:01am
The actual calendar. July 22 is a Monday, just like it was in 1968.
Yes, LBJ quit in March. And primaries were not nearly as significant as they are today... except this year they aren't. Harris will get the nomination without winning a single primary, just like Humphrey in 1968.
In 1968, the Vietnam war divided Democrats against one another, just as the Gaza war is doing this year. There were protests on college campuses, just as there are today.
The only thing missing is Mayor Daley.
The actual calendar. July 22
By Rob
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 11:27am
So?
The sun rose in the east that day, too. Unlike the 22nd being a Monday, the continued consistent motion of the Earth relative to the Sun actually has some impact on the major Party tickets and the election (the destruction of most (human) life on Earth would negatively affect voter turnout).
Gaza divides the Socialist
By Frelmont
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 2:41pm
Gaza divides the Socialist-Progressives from the Democrats.
al gore “lostâ€
By berkleealum
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 9:21am
al gore “lostâ€
No, Al Gore lost.
By Rob
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 10:18am
No, Al Gore lost.
As did Trump in 2020.
No air quotes.
Um
By lbb
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 2:03pm
Where's the bit in the Constitution about how the Supremes can decide elections on a whim?
SCOUS: Stop the recount (Gore
By Frelmont
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 2:44pm
SCOUS: Stop the recount (Gore ahead) wait, (Gore ahead) wait, (Gore ahead) wait, (Bush ahead) NOW!
i’ll never understand
By berkleealum
Tue, 07/23/2024 - 12:12am
this need to demonstrate impartiality by drawing two obviously unrelated things as two sides of a coin.
Al Gore won in 2000 and had
By xyz
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 9:23am
Al Gore won in 2000 and had the election stolen from him in broad daylight by the Supreme Court.
Gore didn't actually lose the
By NoMoreBanks
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 9:23am
Gore didn't actually lose the popular vote, though. Like he lost but there was a lot of interference in that mess.
He "lost" the EC
By lbb
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 2:05pm
That's like saying "We'd have won this baseball game if we were playing by football rules". There's no "winning" the popular vote because popular vote doesn't "win" you anything but a "you tried" star. However...Gore only "lost" the electoral college vote because of some truly shady behavior by the Supreme Court.
I for one am happy we don’t
By Frelmont
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 2:45pm
I for one am happy we don’t decide by the popular vote.
He would have won the EC
By WalkingTheDog
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 3:03pm
If the Supreme Court did not stop the recount.
Yes...
By lbb
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 3:16pm
...I believe that's pretty much what I just said.
Calm down
By deselby
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 9:24am
Events are patterns until the pattern is broken. Every race has its own qualities.
Even if Trump wins, Carson Beach will be open next summer.
Well, yeah
By Will LaTulippe
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 9:45am
*That* beach will be open. It's in a Trump neighborhood.
Typical blow-in stereotyping of Southie
By deselby
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 10:46am
And very easily proven wrong.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/upshot/20...
Biden grossly outpolled Trump in Wards 6 and 7
https://www.boston.gov/departments/elections/state...
Aren't you the guy who was going off about not giving Democrats money?
Fine
By Will LaTulippe
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 1:49pm
Trumpier relative to other Boston wards.
This election is not the time to be calm
By Pete X
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 11:23am
Just a brief list of reasons not to be a calm.
Now, as your are obviously an older white man, this probably doesn't impact you directly yet, but telling everyone else not to worry their little heads is appallingly blinkered and tone deaf.
But yeah, Carson beach will probably be open next summer.
judges are ignoring centuries
By Scratchie
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 1:52pm
And all these years, I've been told that conservatives positively abhor that sort of judicial activism.
Even if Trump wins, Carson
By Rob
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 1:55pm
Site of the new Joe Moakley coal-fired Power Plant by 2026, if Trump has his way.
What's the sample size on that?
By brianjdamico
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 9:31am
n is pretty small even looking at total number of presidential elections, looking at elections where the sitting VP ran for POTUS would be a very small sample size. And how many of those were after one term vs after 2 terms?
Gavin Newsom?
By Will LaTulippe
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 9:47am
People are fleeing his state in droves.
Also, aren't people afraid that Trump will exercise his immunity, and make his second term a revenge tour? The major opponent for that is supposed to be a guy who survived a recall after getting his at best, dumb, and at worst, corrupt ass photographed out at dinner when everyone else was told they couldn't?
Call me weird, but I'd like for my American President to not conduct themselves with impunity.
People aren't fleeing California in droves.
By MC Slim JB
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 10:01am
The state's population recently fell from 39 million to 38.965 million, per the US Census Bureau. I wouldn't call 0.0009% of the country's most populous state even one drove.
But the point is moot: Newsom has already endorsed Harris.
Two things
By Will LaTulippe
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 10:32am
1) Over what timespan?
2) What was the growth of the American population as a whole over that same timespan?
Sure: it's YoY, in which timespan
By MC Slim JB
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 12:11pm
overall US population growth was 0.53%.
To put this in perspective, NY, LA, HI, IL and WV all lost a greater percentage of their population than CA, while OR and PA were not far behind. But they're all fractions of a percent, most under 0.3 percent.
I can't wait to see
By Will LaTulippe
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 1:52pm
How many peace out of the 50 states entirely, once a generation who turns 18 being fluent in at least two languages has the option to call it a day with the U.S.
If you speak only English, you're shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic when you change U.S. states.
"the option to call it a day"
By lbb
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 2:43pm
Believing that other countries will welcome you for no reason other than your intrinsic wonderfulness is the epitome of American arrogance.
Oh, no
By Will LaTulippe
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 3:36pm
I know it's difficult to get into other countries, and that they really don't want my sorry U.S. ass. That's why I cited the two languages thing: Opens up your options.
Al Gore would have won
By WalkingTheDog
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 10:44am
Al Gore would have won if the governor of Florida and the Supreme Court had not interfered.
And the Republican Party.
By Scratchie
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 1:52pm
And the Republican Party.
When LBJ dropped out Bobby
By anon
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 11:13am
When LBJ dropped out Bobby Kennedy was still alive. Sadly RFK gets killed, and that threw the nomination to HH.
Only one term in though
By tachometer
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 8:53pm
Gore followed two Clinton terms, Humphrey the two JFK/LBJ terms, Nixon the two Ike terms.
I think there's a certain fatigue that comes after two terms like that which Harris isn't under and could change that calculation.
We've been on "pit and the
By Rob
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 9:06pm
We've been on "pit and the pendulum" mode for many decades - or had been, at least.
After 20 years of FDR/Truman, it has gone: R 8 years, D 8 years, R 8 years, D 4 years, R 12 years, D 8 years, R 8 years, D 8 years. That gets us up through the Obama years. Mostly 8 years of back and forth, party out of power gets agitated enough (and/or swing voters tired of the in-power party) to swing back the other way.
Now... It has accelerated. Two single-term presidencies in a row? If 45 becomes 47, that'll be three (if his health doesn't crater). Heck - if Harris wins, she might be only a one-term.
1968 was a lifetime ago
By SwirlyGrrl
Tue, 07/23/2024 - 5:42pm
Are you saying that something that happened in 1912 would have been relevant in 1968?
That's ridiculous.
You can't possibly be that
By Rob
Tue, 07/23/2024 - 8:38pm
You can't possibly be that ignorant.
I'm highly educated and fully aware
By SwirlyGrrl
Wed, 07/24/2024 - 7:46pm
In fact, I'm fully aware that there are a bunch of scared older men who would really like it to be 1968 again are grasping at straws and making pseudointellectual arguments to cover their insecurities.
I'm also fully aware that the under-30 voting population is both potentially large and more than 50% do not identify as white non-hispanic.
1968 was 56 years ago and America was a very different place.
Moulton, who normally just likes to tell people to drop out ...
By adamg
Mon, 07/22/2024 - 11:15am
Even Seth Moulton is all in. Statement this morning:
Pages
Add comment