Hey, there! Log in / Register

Chain of anti-abortion clinics sues state over campaign against anti-abortion clinics

A chain of "pregnancy resource centers" - including outlets in Revere and Brookline - that won't offer referrals for abortions for pregnant patients wants the state to leave it alone and stop warning people about them.

In a suit filed in US District Court yesterday, Your Options Medical, which runs clinics in Revere, Brookline and Fall River and a mobile van on the Cape, says the state campaign - which includes ads on the outside of MBTA buses - violates "its constitutional and civil rights to provide medical services without fear of retaliation and threat because of its political and religious views."

The suit formally names Gov. Healey and state Public Health Commissioner Robert Goldstein as well as the Reproductive Equity Now Foundation and its president, Rebecca Hart Holder, which has worked with the state on its campaign.

Defendants' retaliation and selective-enforcement campaign accuses YOM and other PRCs of being a public health threat, of carrying out false and misleading advertising, and of other falsehoods, while actively urging citizens to report PRCs to State law enforcement. Defendants' campaign is not isolated; in fact, it began when Governor Healey, as Attorney General, issued consumer advisories making it emphatically clear that pro-life PRCs are not welcome in Massachusetts because of their views and speech. Moreover, Defendants have knowingly targeted pro-life PRCs for repeated enforcement actions without a proper basis and based solely on REN's unwarranted complaints, in violation of their rights to equal protection under the law.

Your Options, which says it has been licensed by DPH to provide counseling and certain medical outpatient medical services such as ultrasounds since 1999, "was founded in 1991 by three Christian families in Boston who saw the need to offer women in unplanned pregnancies a safe place to receive help and support in choosing life."

Plaintiff believes that all human life is sacred and made in the image of God.

As a Christian organization, Plaintiff is committed to aiding women and couples facing unexpected pregnancies by providing ultrasounds, counseling, and meeting the practical and material needs that may otherwise cause them to consider abortion.

As a life-affirming entity, Plaintiff does not perform abortions, does not refer for abortions, and does not advertise that it performs abortions.

The heart of Plaintiff's ministry is to meet the emotional, relational, material, and spiritual needs of mothers and their babies.

The group alleges the state is fostering a climate of fear and that its clinics have been the target of graffiti at least three times since the release of the Dobbs decision in 2022.

In response to these acts of vandalism, Massachusetts officials did not pursue a public awareness campaign to bring these vandals to justice.

Instead, government officials took affirmative steps to contribute to, and escalate, the hostile rhetoric against pro-life organizations, such as YOM.

On July 6, 2022, just weeks after YOM was first vandalized, then-Attorney General Maura Healey issued a factually baseless "advisory" stating: "While crisis pregnancy centers claim to offer reproductive healthcare services, their goal is to prevent people from accessing abortion and contraception."

The group alleges the state, acting with Hart Holder, has filed subpoenas for records about its clinics' operations that would reveal confidential patient information, that it has never withheld information about its "pro-life" beliefs from patients and that the state's campaign, which calls on patients to file complaints is harassment:

The conduct of the State Defendants constituted a violation of YOM's clearly established free speech rights such that every reasonable State official in similar circumstances would have understood that the conduct violated YOM's constitutional rights; actively seeking complaints against PRCs in a targeted campaign of harassment, threats, and unequal enforcements based on political and religious viewpoint is a clear constitutional violation that is closely analogous with the constitutional violations in past cases.

The religious nature of the harassment is clear, the group alleges, because "the entire category of reproductive care clinics has not been targeted by Defendants, only those that promote childbirth rather than abortion."

The underlying assumption of the policy is that only those PRCs that promote the sanctity of human life are likely to engage in unethical conduct; and that belief in the sanctity of human life is, for YOM, a religious one.

The suit seeks a court order declaring the state is simply wrong, ordering it to stop its campaign immediately and award damages and attorneys' fees.

YOM is represented by the Massachusetts Liberty Legal Center, affiliated with the rightwing Massachusetts Family Institute, and the American Center for Law and Justice in Washington, whose chief counsel, Jay Sekulow, formerly represented then President Trump.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Complete complaint347.92 KB


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Those state-funded anti-anti-abortion ads make me proud to live in Massachusetts. I hope the courts stomp these people.

up
Voting closed 110

So much to unpack here.

First off, these billboards and ads have trended on social media because no other state does this and its very 'in your face'. The state is doing the right thing here and showing expecting women that there are options out there and don't need to go these 'clinics'.

But really...

The group alleges the state is fostering a climate of fear and that its clinics have been the target of graffiti

Um isn't that what your clinic does.. foster fear in pregnant women in hopes that they won't go get an abortion. From my understanding that is pretty much what these 'clinics' do...

Maybe they are the ones instilling fear, not the state.

Secondly, they have been a target for graffiti? Aw poor baby, so the decades of fire bombs, death threats, protestors, and what not out front of Planned Parenthood clinics ACROSS THE UNITED STATES now are coming your way? Let me play the world's smallest violin because its playing your song.

Go cry me a river.. so much so that you'll float on outta this state and not come back.

Seriously, these people need to go fold it in four corners....

up
Voting closed 114

But why the hell is the state entering the advertising business? I thought we were short on cash.

Let the non-profits duke it out via billboard ads.

up
Voting closed 36

This is a public health campaign.

These "clinics" try to prevent pregnant people from accessing proper prenatal care and obstetric services. This leads to women dying and needlessly suffering. It also leads to babies being born with low birth weight, pre-term, and everything that delayed prenatal care can mean.

It is in the state's best interest to NOT have idiots pretending to be clinics steering pregnant people away from actual medical care. Kids with serious health impacts cost the state a lot of money, let alone the impacts on pregnancy that can also be debilitating.

up
Voting closed 94

Social media ads cost very little.

The state is in the public health promotion business. These "clinics" are a fraud and hurt women and children.

Do some homework sometime, pops.

up
Voting closed 54

Is not about being "okay with" seeing your neighbors get lied to....

The state is doing the right thing, and, by the way, the state IS a non profit.

up
Voting closed 37

Should the state also pay for anti war ads?

Again, the state should not be using tax dollars for this.

Handing out contraceptives is healthcare, advertising is not.

up
Voting closed 18

The operators of these so-called "crisis pregnancy centers" are using deceptive advertising and outright lies. How is it not within the state's purview to counter those lies?

up
Voting closed 26

I'll echo the other anon here and say this is a Public Health Service Marketing program.

Same as ads for Covid and Flu Vaccines. Same ads for shingles. Same for HIV testing. Same for anything health related really.

The state is doing a service with these ads because these 'clinics' are sneaky in the way they attract "customers". They bring people in with the premise of one thing, then it turns into the 'horrors of abortion'. Talk about bait and switch.

This is a woman's issue that needs to be addressed in this manner. The state can't stop these places from opening but they can certain make them feel unwelcome.

up
Voting closed 47

up
Voting closed 21

I was 3000 miles away and saw a picture of my neighbor on the cover of the Seattle PI.

She was dead.

Still can't unsee.

up
Voting closed 15

Remember this case ?

up
Voting closed 39

The problem isn't that these organizations are anti-abortion, it's that they use deceptive advertising to confuse pregnant women (especially if they're young, panicking, and don't have support from their family). If these people called themselves something like Pro-Life Options Instead of Abortion Medical then the Commonwealth wouldn't have a legal basis to complain. But an honest name would defeat the purpose of intentionally misleading pregnant women. Instead we get "Your Options Medical," which sounds innocuous and non-ideological. What scumbags.

up
Voting closed 44

If they weren't trying to deceive people, "Your Options Medical" could run ads saying things like "pregnant? Need prenatal care? Call us," "Pregnant? Keeping the baby? Call us for free care." Of course, that assumes they actually provide affordable, or any, prenatal care.

A less-deceptive name would also be a good idea, if they don't want to be accused of false advertising. The current name also doesn't sa

"Your options" also doesn't indicate that they are trying to meet spiritual needs, or that they have religious motivations. A lot of pregnant people will want religious or spiritual support from their families, or from a religious leader or congregation they're already connected to, not some random stranger in a clinic.

up
Voting closed 32

They pretend to provide "care" but see Ron's link for details.

They believe that referring women to actual doctors over health concerns will "cause" abortions.

up
Voting closed 29

So-called "crisis pregnancy centers" operate on lies. Lies are at the heart of their business model. They lie, they dangle the promise of help to get pregnant people in the door, their "staff" are ignorant, unqualified, ideologically driven LIARS. I hope they lose and lose big, and go broke and end up penniless in the gutter. They are unspeakably vile.

up
Voting closed 46

Tax the churches. Christianity, especially, has held this country back for far too long.

up
Voting closed 33

This is a good example of the state protecting its citizens. An awareness campaign against a fraudulent, deceptive enterprise that poses a real world public health hazard. We’d be wise to use the word blastocyst with a picture instead of embryo.

Now, contrast that with how the state preys on its weakest citizens by running the purest form of gambling: the lottery, and permitting interstate gaming. Not only that but Massachusetts is not taking a stand against the gamblingification of everything (GoE). The state is guided by the interests of certain stakeholders. I realize that some laws are “archaic”, (if harmless and historic) but morality isn’t.

Another example of the state acting immorally is the meaningless and absurd Sackler wrist slap.

up
Voting closed 31