Hey, there! Log in / Register

Idle buses are the polluter's workshop, group says in suit against Greyhound over its buses at South Station and in South Boston

The Conservation Law Foundation today sued Greyhound Lines, saying the company is letting its drivers idle their diesel-powered buses - and spew out noxious chemicals - for more than the five minutes allowed by state law.

In its suit, filed in US District Court in Boston, the foundation says an investigator it had watch idling Greyound buses at both South Station and at a garage and lot at 569 East 1st St. in South Boston on 15 days from December though August, found buses frequently idling for longer periods, in several cases for more than 20 minutes, in three cases more than an hour and in one case for two hours and 17 minutes.

The group says this is bad for everybody from children playing at Medal of Honor Park, just two blocks from the South Boston facility, to patients and employees at Tufts Medical Center, just a half mile from the South Station bus terminal, to people strolling the downtown Greenway, even closer to the terminal.

Diesel-fueled vehicles emit diesel fuel exhaust, which contains fine particulates, nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2 ), benzene, formaldehyde, and forty other kinds of toxic air contaminants.

The foundation is seeking a court order to make Greyhound knock it off - and pay $121,275 per day for each violation for all [Clean Air Act] violations that occurred after November 2, 2015 and that are assessed on or after December 27, 2023.

Topics: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Complete complaint364.73 KB


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

who sued Greyjound for illegally changing the use of that land from residential to a parking lot, and won. The City of Boston ignored that ruling and allowed Greyhound to continue using the lot.

up
Voting closed 31

…. but effectively. Even when ignored they set precedents.

up
Voting closed 10

But the suit is necessary.
Bus drivers are notorious for this.

Bad publicity for the puppy.

up
Voting closed 40

You would not believe how many idling cars I saw just the other day.

And that was just when I rode over Storrow and Drive and the Pike, pick anywhere in the city you'll find cars idling in the bus/bike lanes. For shame!

But don't worry, I saw a cyclist breathing very heavily after an uphill ride, have to mention that so I'm not accused of being one sided about emissions!

up
Voting closed 39

Technology. Some cars turn off when they stop at a crosswalk, but others are idling in fair weather when the owner is hanging out at Starbuck’s.

Are Greyhound buses diesel? Don’t diesel v-hickles need to idle?

up
Voting closed 19

This state document says light and medium-duty diesel vehicles are exempt from emissions tests. I don't know if that includes buses. I don't think any diesels should be exempt.

I worked for a while in the machine shop of a foundry at the Faulkner Mills in Billerica. The shop was in the lowest level of the building, lower than the truck garage. On cold mornings, the (diesel) truck drivers would start their trucks in the garage and let them run for a while so they'd be warm. The exhaust would sink down to where I worked, and it really stank the place up. A major reason I left that job.

I hate diesels, especially those "rolling coal" assholes. They should have their licenses revoked. Any vehicle found to have that modification should be banned from driving on public streets.

up
Voting closed 20

I wish the authorities would take idling more seriously. There shouldn't be any need for a private lawsuit.

up
Voting closed 44

There truly is no need to idle unless is -10 degrees.

up
Voting closed 30