This sounds like the neighbors have an issue with the owner for other reasons and the liquor license is being used to either negotiate those issues or punish him.
Should be yes, and the burden should be on the no's to make their case when going against licenses like this. Let the market decide how many places serve. This state is so fucked when it comes to alcohol regs.
Comments
If the tables are already there, why not?
I don't see any valid reason for denying this.
This sounds like the
This sounds like the neighbors have an issue with the owner for other reasons and the liquor license is being used to either negotiate those issues or punish him.
I would be curious what those were.
The default answer
Should be yes, and the burden should be on the no's to make their case when going against licenses like this. Let the market decide how many places serve. This state is so fucked when it comes to alcohol regs.