Hey, there! Log in / Register

Rezoning Boston

Mayor Walsh yesterday announced the first citywide planning effort in 50 years, and wants your input on what the city should look like in 2030 (i.e., our 400th birthday). The Globe has more.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

I could either go super-futuristic, or dystopian. Or super-futuristic-dystopian. Make it happen, Marty!

up
Voting closed 0

I want to see a decaying giant Olympic stadium that we ran out of money to tear down.

I want to see working-class people have to commute in from Fitchburg and Attleboro to serve coffee and wait tables for the rich people who have made the city a sea of luxury condos.

I want to see every MBTA station shut down one at a time for 2 years so they can remodel each one into a glass box.

I want more buildings that look identical to every other building they're building.

I want to see Sweet Caroline played at Fenway EVERY inning.

I want to see more bank branches and cell phone purveyors, and fewer bookstores and neighborhood bars.

up
Voting closed 0

More Dunkies. Perhaps replace the food trucks with mobile Dunkies? They could have a little slogan on the side, "this van runs on Dunkies". Duck Boats can become Dunk Boats. People say the locals don't often use the Duck Tour because it's too touristy. Nosiree, it's because of a creeping anxiety that they'd be away from a Dunkies for more than 10 minutes. Look at the Red Sox' attendance figures: it's not a coincidence that their sellout streak happened not long after they finally opened a Dunkies inside. Luxury condos are nice, but more Dunkies means there's no need for a condo to sleep in because you'd be running on Dunkies and you'd have no reason to sleep.

up
Voting closed 0

SOMEONE ON THIS SITE GETS IT RIGHT

up
Voting closed 0

The smoke shops will be competing with the nail salons to overtake the number of Dunkins. There's some logic to that; I mean, SOMEBODY is buying those donuts. (The number of nail salons continues to baffle me.). I was sorry to see Raven Books replaced by a smoke shop on Newbury, but it's the future — the second smoke shop (if not the third?) within a few blocks. Now, if bookstores could start selling pot vaporizers, etc., perhaps they could stay in business. Because there was so much pot smoke filling the streets in my crystal ball that I couldn't see anything else in 2030 clearly. And me with asthma....

up
Voting closed 0

Most people only have one Dunkies hole on their face, but 20 nails on their body. It makes sense that there'd be so many nail salons when you really think about it.

up
Voting closed 0

We get less of this curmudgeon commentary and instead hear voices with real ideas, desires and a drive to change this city for the better.

Come mothers and fathers
Throughout the land
And don’t criticize
What you can’t understand
Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is rapidly agin’
Please get out of the new one if you can’t lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin’

up
Voting closed 0

All I want is fewer cars on the roads, and better public transit and more pedestrian-only zones. And I want more bookstores. Everything else I'll roll with whatever other people decide.

up
Voting closed 0

Sorry, the constant barrage of snarky comments about the doom and gloom of the Olympics/Urban Renewal might have sparked that response.

Theres hope that we can change the city for the better, I just worry about those negative people that choose to get in the way of progress simply because they don't want to upset the status quo or they believe that because we failed to improve this city in the past that we will never succeed in the future.

up
Voting closed 0

I hear what you're saying, but the article I read in the Globe didn't give me any reason to be hopeful. More Faneuil Halls? A bogus food court is the first thing that comes to mind when envisioning Boston's future? Did I misread the article? Maybe that was The Globe's vision and not the Mayor's.

up
Voting closed 0

certain cynicism about utopian long-range plans for the City of Boston -- in the face of the overweening influence of greedy corporations against the welfare of ordinary citizens, corrupt practices by our big construction firms, a local press that can no longer afford long-form investigative reporting, and general bureaucratic incompetence (see the Big Dig, the outrageously awful urban "planning" in the Seaport, the failure of government to invest properly in the MBTA, the cheerleading for the Olympics despite rafts of evidence that is highly unlikely to deliver the promised benefits to local citizens and small businesses, etc., etc). -- is well-earned.

Marty's vision and efforts are laudable; I laud them. I've lived in Boston my whole adult life and intend to stay here; I truly want the city to be a better place to live for the entire citizenry. Forgive me for wondering how the heck Walsh can realize a tenth of his goals in the face of human folly and the abiding self-interest of the rich and powerful in our so-called Commonwealth that this site does such a good job of documenting. The United States of Citizens United doesn't give a shit about little people anymore, and if you aren't doing anything to change that basic fact, putting a smiley face on Imagine Boston 2030 isn't going to help much.

up
Voting closed 0

This is a small by seemingly momentous move.

Think about it, after decades of doing development project by project or neighborhood by neighborhood, we are going to take a holistic approach. Sure, just like the last effort, there will be mostly things in the works, but on the other hand, initiatives like increasing transit oriented development will be backed by an official document.

I've often felt that development suffers by siloing of planning. So many office buildings are being built downtown and the Back Bay touting transit access, but what happens when all those new workers start crowding onto the trains. And for that matter where are all these new workers supposed to live? But a single plan, covering all aspects of the city, might help with this.

By the way, if you check out the 1965 plan, note the chapter on the World's Fair. Yes, sometimes the city comes up with big plans, and sometimes they fail.

up
Voting closed 0

It's a really big problem for cities right now that urban real estate is such a hot investment - distorted markets lead to distorted priorities.

I'd rather that property owners be more concerned with what's happening on that property than the value of the property itself.

up
Voting closed 0

My cynicism is that Walsh's parade of shiny, fluff initiatives is all about his 2017 reelection. Read any of the press releases coming out city hall. The PR people always focus on how Walsh (as opposed to the city) are doing all these unprecedented things.

Walsh campaigned promising that he was going to to replace the BRA with a proper planning department. Before trying to come up with a 15 year plan (which will probably get ignored anyway), Walsh ought to set up that new planing department first.

up
Voting closed 0

now leases his music to corporations.

up
Voting closed 0

By 2030, working-class people will be replaced with robots.

up
Voting closed 0

Will they be programmed to catcall and sexually harass women walking past their construction sites? Gotta keep that blue collar charm.

up
Voting closed 0

Suit and tie jerks can be every bit as bad, and even a lot more passive aggressive about loudly commenting on appearance "amongst themselves".

up
Voting closed 0

the Combat Zone.

up
Voting closed 0

The vcr, internet, and soon VR replaced the need for that form of live entertainment.

up
Voting closed 0

Selectively re-zone all of the automotive businesses as residential, demolish autozone and herb chambers and all of the other wastes of valuable land that don't serve the locals, build at least 6 stories residential with ground floor shopping/restaurants especially along Comm Ave and Brighton Ave. Eliminate parking requirements so the new projects can occupy some of the smaller lots that would open up.

up
Voting closed 0

Is 1969 really the last time there were any change to a Boundary of a Boston Ward or Precinct?...
http://bostonwardsprecincts.blogspot.com

Update Boston Wards and Precincts

up
Voting closed 0

Next question.

up
Voting closed 0

Potential Candidates and Incumbent Candidates for Boston City Council are mentioned at

http://www.dotnews.com/2015/councillors-challengers-get-down-business-ca...

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/04/20/city-council-races-drawing-f...

http://www.cityofboston.gov/images_documents/2014%20Elected%20Officials%...

____________________

At-Large
1) Dorchester’s Annissa Essaibi George, email
annissaeg at hotmail.com

2) Present Councilor At-Large Hyde Park's Stephen J. Murphy, email
councilormurphy at aol.com

3) South Boston's Chrissanta C Rudder, email
chrissantarudder46 at gmail.com

4) Present Councilor At-Large South Boston's Michael F. Flaherty Jr, email
flahertyforboston at gmail.com

5) Present Councilor At-Large Dorchester's Ayanna S Pressley, email
ayannap at ayannapressley.com

6) Present Councilor At-Large South End's Michelle Wu, email
michelleforboston at gmail.com

7) South Boston's Bryan D Fuller, Veteran, email
bryandfuller at gmail.com
____________________

District 1 East Boston, Charlestown, North End/Waterfront, Harbor Islands are a part of District 3, except Deer Island, which is part of District 1.

8) Present District 1 City Councilor East Boston's Salvatore LaMattina, email
sallamattina at gmail.com
____________________

District 2 City Hall/Beacon Hill/Islands , Chinatown, South Boston, South End, Harbor Islands are a part of District 3, except Deer Island, which is part of District 1.

9) Present District 2 City Council President South Boston's Bill Linehan

10) South End's Bentzion Chudnovskiy, email
press at spyrealty.com

11) South Boston's Kenneth P Jervis, email
kensusboston at gmail.com
____________________

District 3 Dorchester, Harbor Islands, Roxbury/South Bay , Dorchester/New Market , South Boston , Mattapan, South End, Harbor Islands are a part of District 3, except Deer Island, which is part of District 1.

12) Dorchester's Donnie Palmer, Veteran, email
donniedpalmer at gmail.com

13) Present District 3 City Councilor Dorchester's Frank Baker, email
fkbaker2 at yahoo.com
____________________

District 4 Dorchester, Roslindale, Dorchester/St. Mark’s , Jamaica Plain, Mattapan, Hyde Park

14) Mattapan's Jovan J Lacet, Veteran, email
lacet4boston at gmail.com

15) Mattapan’s Andrea Joy Campbell, email
campbellandreaj at gmail.com

16) Present District 4 City Councilor Dorchester's Charles Calvin Yancey, email
ccyancey at aol.com

17) Dorchester's Terrance J Williams, email
mrwilliamsmission at yahoo.com
____________________

District 5 Hyde Park, Readville, Roslindale, Mattapan

18) Present District 5 City Councilor Hyde Park's Timothy McCarthy, email
mccarthy4boston at gmail.com

19) Mattapan’s Jean-Claude Sanon, email
jeanclaude_sanon at yahoo.com
____________________

District 6 Jamaica Plain, West Roxbury, Roslindale, Roxbury, Back of the Hill

20) Present District 6 City Councilor Jamaica Plain's Matt O'Malley, email
matt at votemattomalley.com

21) Jamaica Plain's George John Rigas, email
georgerigas at yahoo.com
____________________

District 7 Roxbury, South End, Fenway, Dorchester

22) Dorchester's Althea Garrison, Former State Representative

23) Roxbury's Charles L Clemons Jr, email
djccsounds at aol.com

24) Present District 7 City Councilor Grove Hall's Tito Jackson, email
tito4boston at gmail.com

25) Roxbury's Roy Owens, email
prince.albert204 at yahoo.com

26) Roxbury's Kevin A Dwire, email
kadwire at hotmail.com

27) Roxbury's Haywood Fennell Sr, Veteran
____________________

District 8 Back Bay/Beacon Hill , Fenway/Kenmore , Mission Hill, West End, Allston

28) Present District 8 City Councilor Back Bay's Josh Zakim, email
josh at joshzakim.com

29) Beacon Hill's Thomas Joseph Dooley III, email
tom at electtomdooley.com
____________________

District 9 Allston, Brighton

30) Present District 9 City Councilor Brighton's Mark Ciommo, email
mark at markciommo.com

31) Allston's Thomas Leonard

up
Voting closed 0

Jervis is no longer running, based on an email received from his email address.

Chudnovskiy I haven't seen any more info on.

up
Voting closed 0

I'll probably be dead by then.

up
Voting closed 0

What we really need is an area-wide focus to fix the transit system and fill the holes; to reorient towards "village" development (jobs and homes in the same area); to increase the amount of space available for small businesses; to comprehensively link the city up so that it is easier to get around; etc.

This is a start, but Somerville and Cambridge are way ahead in this game and Boston could not only learn, but benefit from a team effort.

up
Voting closed 0

Those cities and towns, like Brookline, Cambridge, Somerville, and Medford, that claim to be a part of Boston should petition the legislature to be annexed to Boston.

Seriously, though, thinking of your first gasp when you pondered the end of an independent Medford as it would be subsumed into the giant that is Boston, that is the problem with regional planning. Each municipality would have to give up some level of autonomy to make a regional plan work. And in the Boston area, that is highly unlikely.

up
Voting closed 0

Each municipality would have to give up some level of autonomy to make a regional plan work. And in the Boston area, that is highly unlikely.

This right here is a huge part of the problem with the MBTA, housing costs, and economic development. Acting like fifedoms is foolish when dealing with an integrated economy.

Personally? I would love to see Medford be annexed by Somerville, and I'm not alone in that. The amateur hour governance and pretending to be a small town in an isolated rural location need to end.

It is, however, telling that you think that it all needs to be a single government in order for cities to work together on planning and development. It doesn't.

up
Voting closed 0

And Medford is a City, not a town, with a mayor and everything. At the end of the day, we do not live in the Greater Somerville area, so it would be Boston doubling it's population and the likes of Medford, Brookline, and Quincy feeling that less special.

There is a regional planning organization in the area, but they are constrained by what they can do. This is New England, where smaller government is better government, no matter how inefficient it is. I mean, the MBTA was only set up in the 1960s. Before that, decent public transit had a much smaller footprint.

up
Voting closed 0

I wouldn't find the notion of unification unwelcome.

But you need to think outside of your parochial mindset and realize that it might not be necessary to unify planning and advocacy without the trouble and cost of annexation.

up
Voting closed 0

I know about the MAPC. I know about how things are done in the Twin Cities and Denver region. I know how places like Indianapolis and Lexington, KY, have gone the route of consolidated city-county government to achieve lower costs. You're the one that rather than mentioning the largest city in the metropolitan area, the one whose citywide planning is being discussing in this topic, opted to say how great it would be if your city merged with another city but not the largest city in the metropolitan area. In short, stop being so parochial.

To achieve good regional planning, municipalities would have to cede some of their local power. It's a reality. That's the trouble you would face if planning went the way you (and to some extent I) wanted.

up
Voting closed 0

... it kept getting bigger and bigger, then in 1943, it merged with the prefecture of Tokyo, and the former city proper became 23 cities. These cities and the other cities of the prefecture have a metropolitan government more akin to that of a state. Since Boston never thad the degree of centralization that the former city of Tokyo did, I suspect metropolitanizing things here is probably a non-starter.

up
Voting closed 0