Hey, there! Log in / Register

It's bad enough the Bruins lost

Weber King got caught in the "total chaos" exiting the first Garden event since the T entrance on that side of Causeway closed, forcing thousands of people to cross the street to get to the subway:

Yeah, this isn't gong to work, at all. Need a plan B ASAP.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Why did they close a perfectly good entrance in the first place?

up
Voting closed 0

Supposedly, in three years, there'll be a tunnel from the Garden/new tower to the T stop.

up
Voting closed 0

They managed to keep the parking garage entrance open to the public while they are building the new apartment complex on the other side of the Garden but somehow they couldn't figure out how to keep the pedestrian walkway open for a bulk of the construction? (!)

That you, MBTA and the City of Boston for looking out for the best interests of your riders and citizens. If the goal was to lower housing prices by making Boston less desirable, you're on the right track.

up
Voting closed 0

Can't have a good transit debate without someone alluding to cars not getting screwed while transit riders do.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm not trying to bring up the cars vs bikes vs peds debate. I just want to know why they did what it took to leave the parking lot open but couldn't do the same for the pedestrian underpass. (My guess? The parking lot is owned by the Garden who would have demanded the developer to pay them for whenever the lot was closed off.)

My point is neither group should get "screwed". The building permits should not have been given until the developers figure out a way of having these critical transit links remain open for a bulk of the construction. This isn't an insurmountable engineering problem.

up
Voting closed 0

One of the roads I usually drive down to get to the Sumner was closed on my way to work today because of a new building going up, which caused me to have to go out of my way and catch a light I usually wouldn't. But pedestrians could still use the road to get to get to Maverick station and the Greenway. Should I be just as outraged then?

up
Voting closed 0

Will the road be closed for three years? Were hundreds of other drivers inconvenienced as well? If it's pouring out, did the detour cause you to get soaked as you waited at said light?

up
Voting closed 0

I was inconvenienced today and pedestrians weren't. That's not fair, because I'm in the group being inconvenienced. So instead of looking at the specifics of the original situation and the reasoning behind decisions that were made regarding it, I'm going to complain about a different time that the other group, who has nothing to do with it, wasn't inconvenienced in a situation that is marginally similar at best.

That's how you internet, right?

up
Voting closed 0

Ooohhh, you used "internet" as a verb. Does this mean you win the internets?

up
Voting closed 0

.

up
Voting closed 0

If they closed Mem Drive for 3 years to build a private new building I'd be equally outraged.

It's reasonable to expect the walkway will be closed for a short time. It's not reasonable to close one the most critical and heavily used pedestrian links in the city for THREE YEARS for the benefit of a private developer. The millions of people who need to get between the T and the Garden/Trains in this time period are more important.

up
Voting closed 0

With the connection between the Green/Orange and Commuter Rail. Regardless of how long it is closed, and whether or not it is necessary or "right," I still see no connection between this and the parking garage. Apples and oranges, etc.

up
Voting closed 0

Pats head.

Funny how you say "look at the reasoning blah blah". That's the problem. THERE IS NO REASONING that could justify the stupidity here. THERE WAS NO REASONING at all!

up
Voting closed 0

What I'm saying is that a parking garage entrance staying open has nothing to do with this. Maybe I went a little analogy heavy, but bottom line is, it does not.

up
Voting closed 0

MY CAR MAKES ME SPESHUUULLLLL!

up
Voting closed 0

Clearly your reading comprehension is as on point as your wit. I never said this wasn't inconvenient and I didn't care. I also said that I take the T to the Garden myself, quite often. Also took the Winter Classic train instead of driving. And generally take the T everywhere in the city, with the exception of my daily commute (which takes me through the city), and that will change once GC reopens and I can make a Blue to Green connection without being, gasp, inconvenienced.

What my argument goes back to is that there is no reason to complain about an unrelated parking garage entrance remaining open. Complain about developers getting to do whatever they want in this town all you want, I'm right there with you.

But hey, you know what? Asking a 7 year old to think of (and maybe even type?) a response for you works too. Do you man, do you.

up
Voting closed 0

The entrance is within the footprint of the tower they are building.

up
Voting closed 0

But, with the exception of a few specified weekends, they've managed to keep the train service open while they rebuild the station.

And look more closely at the footprint of the building. There is no legitimate reason why they need to close the existing underground concourse for a full three years.

up
Voting closed 0

No one is building where the tracks are (either station) and on this spot they are going to construct a high-rise tower. Eventually you will get it.

up
Voting closed 0

don't get is what is the overriding necessity to construct the tower such that the current headhouse and underground passage need to be closed for a full three years.

And that is the issue here - this whole thing seems to be driven by the idea of maximizing convenience for the building's contractors, as opposed to maintaining convenience and safety for the people who use the stations every day.

up
Voting closed 0

Were there cops directing pedestrian and vehicular traffic, or was it "self-managed" and road ragey?

up
Voting closed 0

Would not happen around Fenway Park.

up
Voting closed 0

Lucky no one fell and got trampled in the human stampede. It would be interesting to hear from BPD,MSP and TPD to find out if all their officers who get paid overtime for crowd control left or never showed up!

up
Voting closed 0

Yes, it's very important that the BPD put down whatever they were doing so they could help a bunch of drunk bros cross the street.

up
Voting closed 0

In the morning there have been uniformed crossing guards. I didn't notice which unit. When you have 10,000 people attempting to cross a busy roadway in a new configuration it warrants some police.

up
Voting closed 0

And is there any conclusive evidence there weren't any police there? Or are we just cop bashing for the fun of it?

up
Voting closed 0

are Transit Police. While BPD typically provides details in the TD Garden during events, so far they haven't been assigned to crossing duty.

up
Voting closed 0

BPD does the crosswalks before and after an event. We typically have lots of cops out there directing traffic and some cruisers with the lights on. We pretty much shut down Causeway Street to the pedestrians. The goal is to empty The Garden as quickly and safely as possible.

I haven't worked there in a while, but I imagine with the station closing, it's a nightmare. I can't imagine a lot of cops will take this detail now. If you ever want to curse your existence and question if we humans are truly the dominant species on this planet, try directing traffic one night. It's the worst.

- a Boston Cop

up
Voting closed 0

Detail cops get paid to do stuff like this. And "maintaining order / keeping the peace" is one of the primary jobs of police officers.

up
Voting closed 0

to be in the Globe this week.

up
Voting closed 0

You just won't be able to read it if you get home delivery.

up
Voting closed 0

Really? Crossing a street is now a crisis?

There was a time between the new North Station opening and the tunnel being built. Commuters and Garden event patrons crossed the street just fine for a good year before the tunnel was built. Why has it suddenly become a crisis now?

up
Voting closed 0

There was also a time when there was hundreds of trolly routes all over Boston and the systems ran with far greater frequency and reliability.

But it's a Big Deal to take away this walkway for many reasons. The biggest, as far as I'm concerned, is that they "solved" the problem with having the same station have two different wings by making the connecting tunnel. This was a fix to a major flaw that shouldn't have existed in the first place. But then to meet the desires (I won't say needs) of a private developer this tunnel is closed and tens of thousands of people need to suffer? It's unreasonable to expect this many people to add 5 minutes to their commute for the next THREE years. This is on top of a lengthy closing of one of the most used stops in the system for two years.

The new building can be built without closing the tunnel for the duration. They managed to do that with the parking garage on the other side. (Also see: WTC Path stop in NYC) It's not unreasonable to expect a certain level of service from public transit.

up
Voting closed 0

They are building on top of the underground parking garage on the other side, not excavating around it. Here they are fully excavating all sides of the space that is occupied by the pedestrian tunnel.

up
Voting closed 0

It's unreasonable to expect this many people to add 5 minutes to their commute for the next THREE years.

Note that the extra 5 minutes (or more on some mornings) to cross Causeway Street and use the longer walkway into/out of TD Garden may result in people missing connections, which adds even more time to their commute. So it is a significant inconvenience for a lot of people.

up
Voting closed 0

With the Green line trains running, what, about every 8-9 minutes, an extra 5 minutes will push you onto the next train half the time, and then make you 8-9 minutes late to work/class half the time, not too good for most commuters.

I came into Boston on the Commuter Rail last Saturday, the first day of the new 'traffic pattern.' There were about 15 Transit Cops on duty and absolutely no pedestrian was directed to cross the street at the Garden entrance to the new covered walkway! Everyone was just walking in the middle of the road... sigh...

(Yes, there is a covered walkway for the detour, don't fret, pedestrians!)

up
Voting closed 0

(Yes, there is a covered walkway for the detour, don't fret, pedestrians!)

No, the covered walkway gets you from the Garden to the road. It's uncovered across the road to the entrance to the station -- a much further distance then previously was uncovered. If it's raining hard you'll get soaked. If it's slush you'll have a grand old time.

I can't wait to see the snow banks.

up
Voting closed 0

Causeway would be a good street to try out what many other cities around the world are trying: making streets car-free. Newbury Street is an obvious candidate, but Causeway might be a good one as well, at least at certain times.

up
Voting closed 0

Causeway Street is a major artery, funneling people to Storrow, 93, downtown and into Charlestown. Making it car-free would cause a traffic jam that makes last winter's mess look like child's play.
If anything, the city should be going the other way. In Downtown Crossing, if Washington Street and Winter/Summer intersections were allowed cars, I doubt there'd be as much riff-raff loitering in the area.

up
Voting closed 0

Sorry, can you provide more detail on the "riff raff" "loitering" in this area? It's not clear who specifically you're trying to demean. Thanks!!

up
Voting closed 0

Yes - I walk through there a few times a week. My wife works around the corner. I'm trying to demean the packs of people who hang all along there blocking what should be easy access to/fro the area. And the multiple people who have been drunk/stoned and screamed at me, 3 inches from my face in the middle of the day there.
It's pretty simple that if you make it less of a parking lot, and more of a sidewalk where people are moving through, then there will be less of an inclination for people to hang out there.

up
Voting closed 0

..the aggressive nut-jobs trying to raise money for Children International. The drug dealers and teens looking for trouble are saints compared to the assholes with the blue vests.

up
Voting closed 0

Down the end of Canal street (Bay Cove or some such). The clients hang out in the area all day, especially in front of the DDs next to the Fours. It's a hot spot for deals and there are always young red-faced townie kids with strollers screaming at each other.

up
Voting closed 0

Thing is in 3 years it will only be half done.

up
Voting closed 0

Not only is the headhouse closed, but the entire sidewalk and driveway beside it are closed (below the red light at https://goo.gl/maps/ae1LnJX8Gbq), forcing everyone leaving that side of the Garden to go through a scaffold-narrowed covered path to Causeway Street on the other side of the garage ramp. Add in people trying to get to the Orange/Green Lines who have to wait for the light to cross Causeway and the above scene is little surprise.

Funny isn't it how fans basically can't bring anything into the Garden because of the "times we live in" (or some such nonsense), yet someone wanting to cause mayhem could just attack the throngs bottlenecked leaving the arena. Imagine the crushing stampede with the pictured crowds.

up
Voting closed 0

the sidewalk was closed, but they were still letting cars and trucks use the driveway.

up
Voting closed 0

This morning was my first at North Station since the headhouse closed, and I was not expecting the sidewalk to be closed as well. Depending on what track you arrive at, it could be faster to exit the Garden at the other side and (attempt to) use the unsignalled crosswalk at Friend Street to cross Causeway.

up
Voting closed 0

No need to wait for terrorism to cause deaths. I'm sure its just a matter of time before a driver hits and kills one of the thousands of people who are now forced to cross the street.

up
Voting closed 0

Unless the driver is a certified sociopath or under the influence of something, the odds are greatly against it. The masses would be readily noticeable, and there would be no upside to trying to power through a crowd. Also, there would be too many witnesses.

Come on, you keep up with these things. A person (or cyclist) by themselves are much more likely to have an unfortunate encounter with a car or truck than when in a crowd.

up
Voting closed 0

Yeah, good thing there are no drunken construction workers in the area. You know, the kind who stomp on the gas and expect you to jump out of the way as they leave the bar heading back to NH.

up
Voting closed 0

But if it were 50 people, I think any driver would know the futility of the threat (unless, of course, they are really out of it.)

up
Voting closed 0

or someone under the infulence to cause a problem

http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HAR0404.pdf

Plus I'm sure the organizers and attendees of that farmer's market believed the odds of nothing happening were in their favor too.

up
Voting closed 0

I'll add in people of a certain age who mistake the gas and brake pedals, but that said, they sometimes have enough sense not to drive at night, which is when most Garden events occur.

up
Voting closed 0