Boston today released its bid to Amazon that calls for creation of a new Amazonian neighborhood at Suffolk Downs that would include 10,000 new housing units - some even aimed at people who don't work for the company - 1,500 hotel rooms, four new shopping districts and 40 acres of open space and the 8 million square feet of office space Amazon wants.

The bid, which is also supported by Revere and a variety of local institutions and companies, including newcomer GE, also says the state would reverse its longstanding distaste for a connection between the Red and Blue Lines downtown - which would put Amazon Downs within a quick commute of MIT and Harvard. That's at least a $750-million commitment. The bid does not discuss other specific goodies Boston, Revere and the state would be willing to toss Amazon's way in exchange for it making Boston its second headquarters.
HYM, which owns the site, and was already planning a massive mixed-use development there, says it could have the first 500,000 square feet of office space ready for occupancy by December, 2019.
The Phase 1 building design is focused around having Amazonians connected within not only the building, but also the larger campus and the surrounding neighborhood at large. The building is located adjacent to a Blue Line subway station and welcomes Amazonians to their everyday built environment as soon as they arrive to the Site. The path from the train to the building will be surrounded by multiple parks that would offer recreational and meeting nodes, restaurants and cafés to eat and socialize and a ground floor that will allow Amazon to experiment with retail program and lobby options of their choice. Visual and physical connectivity within the building levels, horizontally and vertically, is embedded in the design principles. The building spans large efficient open floor plates to provide flexibility in program design, furniture layout, circulation and to enable collaboration and engagement among Amazonians while keeping sustainable principles as core values.
Access to technology is a key Amazon demand, and the Boston proposal plays up the Boston area's concentration of universities, biotech and medical facilities and tech-based companies. It also notes that Amazon itself already has offices in Cambridge and Boston that will soon employ 2,1000 people.
The bid also talks up all the historical, cultural and sports stuff any Bostonian would be familiar with and points to our wonderful public-transit system - and notes the fact that East Boston housing is currently 40% less expensive than that downtown, in a neighborhood that, along with neighboring Revere, exemplifies the sort of multi-cultural area Amazon is looking to move into.
The proposal gets fairly detailed on how Boston and Revere would re-shape the roughly 160-acre Suffolk Downs site:


The dynamic mixed-use community at Suffolk Downs will be anchored by 550,000 square feet of neighborhood-based street front retail. The development's creative retail strategy will focus on attracting a diversity of shops and restaurants that will spill out onto its urban streets, keeping the community active and engaged throughout the day and night. The retail program within this mix-used development will include restaurants, coffee shops and cafes, as well as a grocery store, pharmacy, bicycle shop and entertainment spaces. The neighborhood will also embrace greater Boston's active and healthy lifestyle by including crossfit, fitness and climbing gyms. Furthermore, the Site will also attract existing local restaurants and businesses and cultivate an authentic retail vibe for the community which will not only serve on-site and residents, but also surrounding neighborhoods.
This vibrant retail environment will also provide opportunities for a range of customized Amazon spaces such as Amazon Go, Whole Foods and Amazon Books. It could also serve as a testing ground for new urban retail models as Amazon continues to redefine retail as we know it. Given this is a ground up development, the new buildings can be designed to accommodate the vision and needs of Amazon retail concepts from the beginning, maximizing their impact and integration within the Site.
Two of the districts, Beachmont Square and Belle Isle Square, will be located at the two existing Blue Line stations. These two nodes will consist of street level retail along tree lined primary streets that will extend into the heart of the Suffolk Downs mixed-use district and both of these nodes will connect into both the central common space but also the new Main Street retail district. These three districts will, when complete, create a continuous retail corridor that starts at one Blue Line station, traverses through the heart of the new mixed-use Suffolk Downs Site and connect to the other Blue Line subway station. Along the way it will connect and cross the 40-acre open space system creating opportunities and synergy between the retail and open space network. The fourth retail district will be an open-air entertainment hub. The unique character of this area will be defined by the many distinct restaurants and pubs lining its vibrant urban streets and central plaza. In addition to bowling and billiards, this 100,000 square foot entertainment hub will also include a small indoor concert venue and other nightlife attractions. Combined, these four retail districts will create a synergy that will not only engage the businesses and residents but draw people from the surrounding neighborhoods and the region.
Just in case Amazon doesn't like Suffolk Downs, the bid also proposes space in the Seaport area of South Boston, Widett Circle (the gift that keeps on giving), Roxbury, that oddly shaped complex proposed for Back Bay station, Harvard's undeveloped Allston lands and New Balance's Boston Landing complex in Brighton.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
mostly agree....
By Irma la Douce
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 11:16am
especially about environmental concerns. But I think a second grocery store makes sense since the population would get much huger?
Maybe. Target also has a
By faegirl
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 2:24pm
Maybe. Target also has a grocery section already 3 doors down as well.
We did have a star market (wicked overpriced) up the street, but a hotel is being put in there now.
Belle Isle Marsh is across the tracks
By Waquiot
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 11:26am
But in the image Adam shows, Belle Isle Inlet is kept in as good a shape as it is now. Of course, that is probably part of the 40 acres of "open land", but I am glad they are not going to put it in a channel.
40 acres
By adamg
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 11:36am
The bid specifically says the 40 acres will be on the Suffolk Downs site. If you browse through some of the renderings, some of that will be rooftop gardens.
Agreed. I'm concerned about
By faegirl
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 2:21pm
Agreed. I'm concerned about the construction phase and the frequent accidental spills and dumping that happens. With the casinos, their track records of dumping was a huge factor.
Belle Isle Marsh is also a flooding corridor
By SwirlyGrrl
Sat, 10/21/2017 - 10:07pm
Anything they build in the area will need to have critical systems up above the second floor - like the Partners building in Assembly.
Not a new video
By ckollett
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 11:17am
The video at the top of this post is basically the same as the one that the city put out last January. Maybe they made that video with things like this Amazon bid specifically in mind, but it's not really something they did just for Amazon (unlike the other video, which is clearly aimed directly at Amazon in many ways).
"says the state would reverse
By Steeve
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 11:18am
"says the state would reverse its longstanding distaste for a connection between the Red and Blue Lines downtown - which would put Amazon Downs within a quick commute of MIT and Harvard. That's at least a $750-million commitment."
Hasn't this been proven that the guy who did the study purposely inflated the projected cost of finishing a tunnel between Bowdoin and Charles just so they could easily dismiss the idea of a connector?
Ari
By Mjolnir
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 12:16pm
Ari Ofsevit, as usual, has a great write-up about this.
I disagree with his suggestions to elevate the terminus and to use a pocket track instead of tail tracks as I would love to see as much incentive to run Blue to Kenmore as possible, but clearly running a cut & cover tunnel from Bowdoin to Charles Circle is doable and reasonably-priced for the benefit.
Not sold on this idea yet
By Dave-from-Boston
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 11:32am
Amazon is looking to be convinced that Boston is the place to be. I think there is a reasonable basis that American cities are being played by Amazon. They may already know where they want to be but are stirring up some competition to leverage the best possible deal for themselves by pitting one location against another.
Location decisions rarely work out for the host location. The promised jobs never quite materialize, the $ input by the host never translates into the windfall for them and the relationship eventually breaks down.
Putting those two issues aside for a moment - a 20 year deal based on Amazon's business projections - really? Who in Mass political leadership is questioning them? Does Walsh have the bandwidth to even know how to negotiate such a deal? Is Baker even going to be around to monitor Amazon's performance points of their part of the deal?
Look at what has been mismanaged in this state over the last 10 - 15 years. The Big Dig. Look at the paralysis over how to fix the T. Look the Olympic bid. Look at the duplicity and corruption (appearance anyway) around medical marijuana. Look at the the casino process. Look are all the patronage issues that have saturated state government.the list goes on and on.
Amazon could be a good deal - provided - that tough questions are answered before hand. I have seen nothing about the detail behind the so called 50k jobs - how can any company project with reasonable certainty their hiring rate 20years out?
Accepting their premise would seem to require us to accept the assumptions that there will not be a recession or two over the next 20 years. We have to belief that Amazon will never be the subject of anti-trust action. Jeff Bezos will remain head of Amazon indefinitely - what happens if not? Amazon remains leader of their business sector - any chance that some organization somewhere is/has been formed to go after them over time?
More importantly - is throwing all our eggs in one basket in the best interest for Boston over long run. Up to their putting out an RFP, was Boston's or Massachusetts growth strategy for the next 20 years based on the premise of "let's get one big company" to locate here? Are we better off getting a 100 to 150 small growing companies to locate here?
Betting on one company and using our finite economic resources to fix long standing infrastructure problems also seems to be terribly flawed logic. We ought to actually commit to fixing what is broke and operate well - companies will come based on the inherent benefits of living here - that's my opinion anyway.
Business taxes
By Will LaTulippe
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 12:41pm
Disclosure: I worked with Amazon on a temporary employment assignment last year.
I tried to look for a nuts and bolts proposed tax break in the proposal, but I have a finite amount of time, and I stopped after the pretty map that tells me what I can do in New England for fun.
So I found this:
Now I have two questions:
1) Will Amazon be offered a reduced rate?
2) If they are, will employees of Amazon also be offered a reduced personal income tax rate, or does the break only go to the corporation?
To opponents of the right: Remember that you criticize them (and justly so) for endorsing trickle-down concepts which serve to only benefit the already wealthy. Be advised to remember that if you choose to argue the "Amazon should get what it wants" side.
Amazon also
By whyaduck
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 1:16pm
says that the 10,000 residential units will house only up to 20 percent of its employees. Ok, what about the other 80 percent?
Marty, in today's Globe article, says "it’s too soon to talk specifics." Apparently talking about specifics will occur after a review of what the other contenders propose and a clearer sense of what Amazon is looking for. How about what we, as a city, are looking for?
So, here are some talking points:
1. Amazon speaks about bringing "high paying" jobs to the area. Which means that rents will probably go up, pushing more folks out of the city that can no longer afford to live there. How is Amazon going to address this 'cause 10,000 resident units is not going to help unless the rents are truly affordable. Will they be?
2. Housing. Where is the other 80 percent going to live and how will our state's infrastructure handle the influx of extra car traffic during rush hour on our already car choked roads and bridges?
3. Will Amazon help build new truly affordable housing to all those that will be displaced due to gentrification of neighborhoods due to Amazon's HQs?
4. Will Amazon pony up some big bucks to fix our MBTA and Commuter Rail?
5. If we are going to give a 136 billion dollar company tax breaks, what will be the benefit to the people not just city coffers?
I’ve been having a real hard time
By Brian Riccio
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 1:58pm
Getting up off the floor from laughter all morning long. Particularly when my girl Shirl gave it the name Amazon.....I can’t .... I just can’t
We are also...
By Hugo
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 2:45pm
The video forgot to add : We Are a City of NIMBYS.
Ha, I see the Paking App is included
By section77
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 2:47pm
Hopefully that will impress Amazon as much as it does us.
Pages
Add comment