Hey, there! Log in / Register

Five-story apartment building could replace parking lot on Mission Hill

Rendering of proposed 36 Parker Hill Ave.

Bird-infused rendering by JGE Architecture and Design.

A developer has filed plans for a five-story, 38-unit apartment building at 36 Parker Hill Ave., at Hillside Street on Mission Hill.

The proposal, by Jason Savage's Savage Properties of Allston, calls for the units to be split between studios and two-bedroom apartments. Its filing with the Boston Planning Department does not say how many of the units will be affordable, but if it complies with new affordable-units that came into effect Oct. 1, six or seven would have to be provided.

The building would have eight parking spaces behind two neighboring buildings, which Savage plans to buy but keep as is, plus indoor storage for 38 bicycles. Also part of the project: A roof deck.

The redevelopment of 36 Parker Hill Ave. from a corner parcel parking lot to a newly construction urban multifamily will add significant value and comfort to the ongoing transformation of the Mission Hill/ Longwood community. ...

The new 5-story building is designed to prominently anchor the intersection of Parker Hill and Hillside Streets taking advantage of the corner lot location. The exterior facade is articulated through a base, middle, top composition with lighter more reflective materials along the top floor above the cornice. Roman brick in a stack bond richly clads the ground level with more traditional roman running bond continues on levels two through four. Generously sized window openings allow light and air to enter the units while also providing a punched rhythm that is consistent with the architecture of the neighborhood.

36 Parker Hill Ave. filings and meeting/comment schedule.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

*air raid sirens spin up*

This is not a drill! All hands respond to combat proposed replacement of parking with housing!

up
Voting closed 24

Its kinda ugly and looks a lot like every other apartment building constructed in the last 15 years, but such is life.
It is going to piss off a lot more people than its ugliness for taking up coveted parking spaces however. I can hear the gnashing teeth already.

up
Voting closed 17

NIMBY is not a dirty acronym. Sure, there’s the occasional overreach and arrogance of gating an historic public path, but people have a right to take up space in this world and create nice things. We still live in a democratic republic with liberty and rights.

up
Voting closed 16

You should hold a candlelight vigil for the parking lot.

up
Voting closed 49

goddamned YIMBIES taking away our goddamned right to park our goddamned SUV's.

up
Voting closed 14

Yes some of us wake up 3:30 with coffee and UHub.....until I realized I didn't have to work today. Thank you all Veterans! Ok, so why can't we build the housing on top of the parking lot? Win win. Now I'm skipping the coffee and going back to sleep.

up
Voting closed 10

Have you heard anybody objecting to this? I am happy about it.
Also, that is not what "NIMBY" means.

up
Voting closed 8

The only time I ever parked in that lot was in the winter, and it was completely iced over because water from further uphill drains out of the retaining wall and had become a smooth sheet. The lot also slopes downhill, not as dramatically as PHA but still pretty steep. I crept in as slowly as possible but immediately lost traction and verrrry slowwwwwly slid sideways until my car gently bonked into another one. Parking on Mission Hill has always been an adventure! You know the risks when you move there.

up
Voting closed 16

that there will be 38 bikes in this building? Our building took the bike spaces and converted them to 2 parking spaces.

up
Voting closed 12

Gotta have a bike room to build. And yes, they usually sit empty and are repurposed eventually.

up
Voting closed 12

The story is missing some interesting info.

I believe Savage already owns all of these properties so I don't quite understand the part about him buying them and making no changes.

The lot has about 20 spots currently that were a zoning requirement for the 40+ units that are currently there so if the math is right you currently have 20 spots for 40 units which will be reduced to 8 spots for 78 units.

It is curious how you can eliminate parking that was a requirement to build the three buildings that sit on the site.

I realize the city does not care about parking requirements for new projects any longer which makes some sense but it seems like the current trend is to remove all existing parking. I wonder if other past zoning requirements such as open space and setbacks will be allowed to be eliminated for a new project on the same parcel?

I guess we will see if it works.

up
Voting closed 20

I know this is meant to be a scare quote, but I unironically love it.

The lot has about 20 spots currently that were a zoning requirement for the 40+ units that are currently there so if the math is right you currently have 20 spots for 40 units which will be reduced to 8 spots for 78 units.

This is a block from an E line stop and given the likely price of this housing probably also a short walk to Longwood for the medical professionals who will be able to afford to live there.

Plenty of demand from people who don't need/want to have a car in the city.

up
Voting closed 24

Also a block from the 66 and 39 and not much further from the D and OL.

up
Voting closed 16

Demand is not really the point I was making. Parking is not even the point I am making.

This is not simply a 36 unit project with minimal parking as adjoining properties now need to get variances to eliminate all of their required parking to allow for this one to move forward which is unusual.

I don't recall another project that required adjacent properties to amend zoning to allow for a new project to move forward. Maybe someone can cite a project?

up
Voting closed 15

seems like the current trend is to remove all existing parking.

Have you been to the seaport? That’s all new construction in the past 20 years and there’s tens of thousands of parking spaces there. And the city permitted 8,000 more just in 2022. This is the main reason traffic has gone from bad to one of the worst in the US.

Boston is still very much in love with parking and driving, don’t worry.

up
Voting closed 16

Why doesn't someone build a park and plant trees?

up
Voting closed 10

Hard to make money off building a park... Also, there's plenty of green space on Mission Hill already (though it would be better if Fitzgerald park were actually public, not private).

up
Voting closed 10

On the apartment building next door there was a double murder during a botched robbery, execution style (RIP Roland & Karen) in one of the basement apartments. I believe there was also another more recent execution of an NU student in one of those buildings - retaliation killed, but they got the wrong apartment.

On a more positive note, buddy growing up's family owned a three decker across the street and out of curiosity checked and looks like they held on to it. Probably bought it for less that $200k and it's pegged at over $1.8 million now. Pretty happy for them and their investment.

up
Voting closed 9

In the apartment building next door there was a double murder during a botched robbery, execution style.

My roommate when I lived on PHA adopted their cat after this.

up
Voting closed 14