Hey, there! Log in / Register

Culture shift: Boston considering opening some streets to open drinking

GBH uncorks the news that City Hall is considering several "open container districts" where people could buy something adult at a local restaurant and then just walk around sipping like we're a common New Orleans or Las Vegas.

Among the areas being considered: Kenmore Square, the Seaport, the North End, Downtown and, of course, Allston/Brighton, where maybe Tavern in the Square closed too soon.

Boston currently bans alcohol consumption in public, or at least away from licensed patios.

Restaurants downtown and in the Seaport are forever being hauled before the licensing board after being cited by police when one of their guest from away - like from across the pond or west of Worcester, doesn't realize just how buttoned down Boston is and walks outside, drink in hand. The restaurants typically then get off with just a warning, after agreeing to post prominent signs on every available wall and door, warning patrons to leave their drinks inside.

Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Here we go!

up
14

Good one!

Open air cannabis use zones. SPARK 'EM UP!

up
11

Get your pot fix smoke free.

Same with nicotine.

Allston is a terrible idea .

when I visited New Orleans. But only a little.

There is some merit in this, but I think being careful in which zones are given the green light is important. I would say that letting every "pre-gamer" going to a Sox game walk around with a PBR pounder is not a good idea.

up
10

North End is included just to tease them, right?

You can’t walk around with an open container in the vast, vast majority of US cities. Boston is hardly an exception. If that makes us “buttoned up” than so is just about everywhere else except for New Orleans, Vegas, Savannah, a handful of other places driven mostly by tourism.

up
11

It's becoming more common.

https://www.planetizen.com/news/2023/11/126249-revitalize-downtowns-citi...

In some cases, states such as North Carolina and Ohio are relaxing regulations to let cities create these zones, explains Kevin Hardy in Stateline. “They aim to revitalize downtown cores hollowed out by the changing nature of retail and the post-pandemic loss of office workers.”

“Aside from bringing foot traffic to shops and restaurants, officials say the success of the new districts reveals the need to update antiquated liquor laws that long banned public consumption in most places to try to reduce public intoxication and drunken driving.”

Hardy describes efforts in several cities and states, noting that, in most cases, the districts face little local opposition. Meanwhile, business owners report seeing increased activity.

State-enforced mandatory twerking zones.

I'm not sure the point of doing something like this every day. Most people aren't just wandering around drinking (aside from legalities).

Block parties and parades and things, I could absolutely see time-and-place type designations for this. Outdoor markets like Faneuil Hall with multiple stalls/buildings, I could see this.

Regardless of whether this is a good idea or not, why is this even being discussed when Boston can't even get approval for the neighborhood liquor licenses the mayor fought for? If we can't even get Beacon Hill to agree to allow more INDOOR drinking, when the heck are we ever going to approve outdoor drinking?

So long as the business establishments don’t take over more sidewalk space and the breweries give us back our park space the city handed over to them.

This will be happening on my neighborhood. Not so glad about that but I’m willing to give it a try. If it means they will make some streets more park like and pedestrian only, that would be fantastic.

I'd love to sip a cold beer while walking the dog after work.