Atlantic Beer Garden swears it's not a dive bar anymore
The Northern Avenue restaurant says it's taken steps to reduce the number of people who try to dive into Boston Harbor, following yet another incident that saw it explaining itself to the Boston Licensing Board.
Beer Garden officials say nobody has jumped into Boston Harbor from their decks since Aug. 10, when a patron took of his shoes and jumped in - and was promptly arrested. That came a couple months after somebody celebrated the Bruins' Stanley Cup win by diving into the harbor from the restaurant's roof - while holding a small replica of the Cup.
The Beer Garden has put signs along the perimeter of the deck that not only isd jumping into the harbor dangerous, it subjects the diver to possible arrest - unlike certain jumps off the nearby ICA, they are not sanctioned by the city. Also, restaurant bouncers tell anybody they see standing up - or even just peering over the edge - to sit down. People who refuse, or who keep doing it, are escorted off the deck, John Ruggierio, in charge of security for the restaurant, told the board today.
Still, all that failed to stop one man around 8:30 p.m. on Aug. 10. Ruggierio, who was working that night, said he noticed a group of people standing near the water - which at high tide might only be two or three feet below the railing - and asked them to sit. They did, but, he continued, as he went back inside, he noticed patrons there pointing toward the water and he turned around just in time to see a splash coming up.
According to a police report, the man was not intoxicated, he just was grabbed by a sudden urge to jump into the briny shallow, took off his shoes, but nothing else, and jumped in. A friend told police the jump took him by surprise. However, a woman spotted with a camera left before police arrived.
The jumper was charged with disturbing the peace; the police report noted a large crowd gathered to watch the goings on after he emerged from the water cold, but otherwise unharmed.
The board decides Thursday what action, if any, to take.
Ad:
Comments
Disturbing the Police?
What will they think of next?
Also known as
Contempt of cop.
Well, ya know, let sleeping cops lie ...
Stupid brain/fingers disconnect! Fixed; it was, in fact, disturbing the peace.
Also known as
Contempt of cop.
Re: Contempt of cop
Of course if he wasn't arrested and he (or someone else) went back and did it again, drowning or breaking a neck, the reflexive anti-cop lament would be "why didn't the lazy police do anything about it the first time?" I'm sure there would be some reference to Dunkin' Donuts too. How trite.
MGL 233.43c -- Erecting a scarecrow in public
If he wasn't arrested, did it again, and died, then I wouldn't think twice about him. I might make a joke at his expense. Maybe something like "well, that's one way to avoid the bill". Your presumption that people would be pissed at the cops if an idiot kills himself doing something stupid doesn't follow. Are you suggesting the thought that if they didn't do something then the reaction of the public to their "laziness" is what spurned them to act on this one? Or did they act because "people shouldn't be jumping into the harbor"...except there's no MGL for that one...oh, right, here it is: Disturbing the
PolicePeace.When was the last (first?) time someone did something legal but stupid, died because of it, and then people were pissed at the cops for not arresting him instead?
In the meantime, I'm just going to issue you a written warning for erecting that scarecrow and knocking it down. It's not even October yet. If I have to come back here to deal with your scarecrows again, you're getting tossed in the cooler. Do we understand each other?
Not a contempt of cop situation though.
I am going to assume that anyone who jumps in the water here in the presence of a police officer is going to be arrested no matter how drunk or assholish they are.
Have you considered a new profession?
Sounds like you are confusing "cop" with "nanny" or even "orderly in a mental institution".
No need to bring up his housing situation
Mr. Fish may have trouble distinguishing police from his minders, but that's not our concern.
No control
Goes to show you that they have no control over their patrons just like the previous establishment before them. Not sure what the Hipster fascination with roof decks is.
RE: Hipsters
Hipsters have a fascination with unexplainable things. Witness planking, ironic eyeglasses, heavy wool hats when it's 90 degrees, grown men wearing shorts year round (and they seldom have nice legs).
Control? Question.
Whats to stop someone from jumping in front of a moving MBTA train?
Does the MBTA have a reasonable responsibility to ensure it doesn't ever happen.
How about someone running across traffic on Storrow? Should the Stateies or the DCR be at fault?
The key word here is reasonable. People jumping from roofs, balconies, or into the harbor are not reasonable. These ones are not even drunk apparently. They're also not breaking any laws.
The only reasonable thing that ABG can do is ban them from the premises and have them arrest for trespassing if they come back.
Why would anyone want to own
Why would anyone want to own a bar. Some clown wants to act like Mighty Mouse and it's the owner's fault?
Personal Responsibility?
What more could/should the establishment have done? The individual was not intoxicated, so it wasn't an issue of over-serving or allowing a drunk patron near the railing. They have a policy that staff will instruct patrons standing near the railing to sit down. At some point, can't we say that this is the fault of the individual who jumped, and not that of the bar which didn't control every action taken by its customers?
Hipster? I'm no fan of
Hipster? I'm no fan of hipsters, but Atlantic Beer Garden (and the nearby Whiskey Priest) is pure frat boy/Jersey Shore type territory.Whiskey Priest even has 'Douche' on their sign.
They own everything in Boston
You can spot their bars by the insipid names.