Hey, there! Log in / Register

Whatever Harvard Business School professors are paid, it's clearly not enough

A Harvard Business School professor goes nuclear - he's still considering whether to sue - when a Chinese restaurant in Brookline overcharges him by $4.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

I don't think any salary could be enough to keep this guy from being the world's biggest cheapskate douchenozzle. Seriously. This makes me cringe for humanity, though my hope is salvaged by the thoroughly polite, friendly and civilized response by the restaurant guy. But Edelman, wow...I can't wait for this to go viral on you. Really.

up
Voting closed 0

I love how the restaurant guy just starts politely saying "I will wait for the authorities to contact me and notify me how to handle this."

up
Voting closed 0

He exhibits a complete lack of understanding of the rights and remedies provided to consumers under ch. 93A

up
Voting closed 0

Even if the statute covers this situation, Edelman seems unfamiliar with the legal principle of de minimis non curat lex (Latin for "you gotta be f***ing kidding me").

up
Voting closed 0

Eat at Sichuan Garden. Hope this results in an increase in business for this guy. I also hope the public shaming keeps this guy from continuing to consider whether to sue.

My immediate question reading the article - I wonder if this guy even tipped.

up
Voting closed 0

I can see taking legal action if he thinks it's a business practice to systematically overcharge but if it happened once he should talk the manager and find a new restaurant.

up
Voting closed 0

He was looking at an old (albeit online) menu.

I have paper menus in a drawer somewhere from 2000 (when I first moved to Boston). Should I bitch that the $5.95 combo platter in those menus is now $8.95?

The website even has a 2011 copyright notice on it.

up
Voting closed 0

The restaurant has an obligation to make sure the menu online is up-to-date. They control that; your menu drawer is beyond their responsibility.

up
Voting closed 0

..but this guy was far more concerned with:
A.) Being a self-righteous douchebag.
B.) $4. (or $12, depending on your view)

If he had started the conversation with "pardon me, but your menu is out-of-date," then maybe a constructive conversation could have taken place. Instead, it was "you cheated me you dirty liar, pay me punitive damages!!"

The restaurant's obligations to update the menu are not nearly as important to our future as this TEACHER's obligations not to be a horrible influence on tomorrow's leaders.

up
Voting closed 0

The restaurant's obligations to update the menu are not nearly as important to our future as this HUMAN BEING's obligation not to be an insufferable douchebag at all times.

up
Voting closed 0

One question for Dr. Endelman, attorney: And, pray, sir how exactly were you "intentionally violated" that you require the owner to recompense you triple damages? For a meal that you self-described as "delicious"?

But, I agree with Adam. Apparently Dr. Endelman is definitely not getting paid enough working at Harvard. Methinks he should consider raising his consulting practice's fees.

And Mr. Duan's responses to this "douchenozzle" were perfect and professional. Kudos to you, sir. You have gained a new customer.

up
Voting closed 0

What, something like 36 bankers dead this year under shaky circumstances? What if the Illuminati frown on this?

up
Voting closed 0

Perhaps he's working on an article, "How to go straight for the nuclear option in financial negotiations under $100." That should get him tenure.

On the rare occasion I'm overcharged, pointing it out usually gets me an apology and a refund. No MBA required.

up
Voting closed 0

The first act of negotiation is to open extreme.

That being said, Ben Edelman is an uppity twat who deserves an open hand bitch slap in the mouth.

up
Voting closed 0

Royal Cheap Fuck

1 oz Crown Royal® Canadian whisky
1/2 oz DeKuyper® Sour Apple Pucker schnapps
1 1/2 oz strawberry juice (can use blended)
1 splashfresh lime juice

Pour Whiskey, Puckers and Strawberry Juice in a shaker and get it good and mixed up. Pour into cocktail glass and squeeze a cold fresh lime over it. Garnish with smugness and enjoy with the knowledge you perpetuated a stereotype.

up
Voting closed 0

I suspect it's Dr. Jerk. Not only is he being a total jerk to the restaurant, but he decided to do so publicly!

("I should be speaking only to your attorney, but I'm going to continue to contact you directly and will ratchet up my demands every time I do." Seriously?)

up
Voting closed 0

I'm not an attorney, nor do I play on on Television, but in a just world his bar association would sanction him for this.

On the other hand, I am impressed by the consistent civil tone used by the restaurant owner.

up
Voting closed 0

gigantic asshole." Not a great reflection on the value of his time, either.

That's some fine PR work on behalf of the university there, smirky. You're going viral, and I don't think it's going to turn out quite the way you hoped it might.

up
Voting closed 0

who lives near Sichuan Garden (the Brookline one or Woburn one)and feels so moved should patronize this restaurant to show support for the owner. We're going to.

up
Voting closed 0

I live in Somerville, but I may make a field trip.

up
Voting closed 0

Sichuan is DELICIOUS and everyone should go even if you're not making a point about the d-bag lawyer.

up
Voting closed 0

Regarding Styx, it would be "Too Much Time on My Hands"

But I think Lennon is more apropos :
"How Do You Sleep"

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LNjTPZW7GCU

up
Voting closed 0

Primitive animals know not to shit where they eat, but not Mr. Edelman.

There's got to be some kind of prize for the best-educated moron.

Good luck ordering from there again.

up
Voting closed 0

I remember back in the 1980s (remember pay phones, anyone?) the phone company (was it NE Tel? NYNEX? I forget) had to pay back literally millions of dollars, in the form of a credit of a buck or two off everybody's phone bill every month, all because some persistent SOB complained about a nickel overcharge and wouldn't let it go until it became a class action (either through litigation or through the regulatory process; I forget)

Man, I loved that guy. Power to the people, and all that.

But this case is entirely different; a miscellaneous independent Chinese restaurant is not, of course, the phone company.

up
Voting closed 0

Edelman wasn't out to just fix the $4 overcharge - he wanted to stop this business from systematically overcharging everyone. Did he go a little too far? Absolutely. But how many of us haven't gone a little too far with a customer service representative at some point. What is worse is how this restaurant in tandem with boston.com would publicly shame a random customer for trying to correct its poor business practices. Private citizens deserve better than this from our "news" outlets.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm betting Edelman was the one who slipped boston.com the e-mail exchanges.

Maybe it's just me, but if I felt an overcharge on a take-out bill from a local take-out place was symptomatic of a bigger problem, my first reaction wouldn't be to go nuclear and threaten a lawsuit. But then, I'm no lawyer, just some random Web guy who understands how easy it is to make a mistake like have the wrong prices up on a Web site. Also, and again because I'm no lawyer, but I thought the state law was to protect consumers from fraud, a crime that usually requires some form of intent, and nothing in those e-mails makes it sound like the restaurant guy was out to defraud people, just that he needs to pay more attention to his Web site.

up
Voting closed 0

This is why places put "prices subject to change without notice" on take-out menus and websites, lest the information therein should become outdated.

up
Voting closed 0

Not sure that caveat holds water for a restaurant website. You change your prices; you change your online menu because you have control of that.

up
Voting closed 0

to publish the emails in which Edelman threatens a small business owner with legal action over a $4 overcharge which the owner, in a friendly and polite way, offers to refund? Edelman's own pettiness and pedantic, bullying tone are what's shameful here. And no, most of us try to remember that customer service reps--and restaurant folk-- are hardworking people and we try not to bust their asses over a few bucks.

up
Voting closed 0

Please explain how the restaurant's action, if you can call it that, amounts to "systematically overcharging everyone". For that to be true, you'd have to demonstrate that it was intentional (intention being a requirement for systematic anything), rather than (as appears to be the case) a simple oversight in the form of a website that isn't up to date.

up
Voting closed 0

Not sure it's intentional, but it's more negligent. They admitted they hadn't updated the online menu in a while. I don't think that consumer law looks at intent in pricing errors.

But it would be difficult to know who might have relied on their online prices versus a paper menu or simply not worrying about it.

up
Voting closed 0

But how many of us haven't gone a little too far with a customer service representative at some point.

This wasn't a "customer service representative". This was a member of the family that owns the restaurant, and he was being extremely helpful and apologetic.

What is worse is how this restaurant in tandem with boston.com would publicly shame a total douchebag for trying to create a "federal case" over a minor oversight

Fixed that for you. If he had just said "You really need to change your website", or if he had reported the website to them and they still hadn't changed it a month or two later, you might have a point.

up
Voting closed 0

The restaurant was wrong for not updating their menu (and they admitted it has been a while).

The professor was wrong for escalating this beyond all reason.

The restaurant should have offered to refund his $4 right away or asked what they could do to make it right.

Ultimately, the professor bears the bulk of this situation getting out of control.

up
Voting closed 0

piss off, ayn rand.

up
Voting closed 0

This was a shakedown. If he really cared about price discrepancies, there were two things he could have done:

1) research the issue by testing various website menus versus charges, and writing an article for a magazine or newspaper about how widespread a problem this is

2) contacted a news station to do such research and have one of those special report things featuring Hank Phillipi Ryan or other consumer crusader

This was about a special discount for him, not solving a moderately prevalent issue.

BTW, I have never had an issue with menu versus charged prices with the services like GrubHub. In fact, most ordering services tell you what each item costs and the delivery cost straight up on your order screen.

up
Voting closed 0

I'M SMARTER THAN YOU ARE SO YOU SHOULD DO WHAT I TELL YOU.
ANOTHER DUMB, HARVARD, F____K

up
Voting closed 0

How about we leave his race, his religion, his town of residence, his institutional affiliation, and any other tribal identity bullshit out of this?

up
Voting closed 0

You take another Midol, Bob.

up
Voting closed 0

How about.... you take another Midol, Bob

Aww.... you made a funny!!!

Cool! I get it! Midol is generally used by women, and on your planet women are ridiculous, so the joke is that, in calling out the bullshit of identity politics, I'm ridiculous.

up
Voting closed 0

It's a reference to you acting like crank anytime somebody says something that's not exactly PC. Lighten up, get off the internet and go make some friends.

And, LOL at your little "women are ridiculous" jab. That's the beauty of the internet for people like you, right Bob? Throw out some inaccurate information to confirm your belief that anyone who says something slightly off color is a sexist, racist, bigot, etc.

up
Voting closed 0

a JP native, JPNative. Why don't ya chill with some chai? It is the holiday season for cripes sake. Let's get jolly.

up
Voting closed 0

Sorry, I couldn't come up with a silly, cute, creative name like whyaduck, whyaduck. I guess I could be creative and call you whyusuck from now on. Why do you suck? Probably because you told me to chill with some chai.

up
Voting closed 0

Aw, you are so cute. Trying to come up with clever retorts.
And you do sound pretty cranky.

up
Voting closed 0

Haha, you insult my SN in a condescending and smug manner without provocation and I'm the charmer?

up
Voting closed 0

sound pretty cranky.

And I believe my response to your comment to changing my name to "whyusuck" was measured and polite.

up
Voting closed 0

If you weren't implying what everyone thinks you were?

Hint: if you don't like blowback over your sexism, implied sexism, or even inadvertent sexism, use a gender-neutral phrase like "ibuprofen for your butthurt" instead.

Which it sounds like you need if you don't get why people are annoyed with you and you are so infantile as to whine "NO IT ISN'T!!!!".

up
Voting closed 0

EVERYTHING is sexist and racist. If you make a joke or snide comment, you're sexist and racist. We should all tip toe around others, hold hands with our neighbors and sing kumbaya around a nice, warm fire.

Honestly, if telling someone to take a midol gets you so worked up that you feel the need to comment and get angry over it, I really do not know what to tell you. I wonder how you get along in the real world if every little thing hurts your feelings or gets you upset?

I mean, Jesus Christ, I've heard women say worse things to guys (i.e. "take the tampon out", "do you have sand in your vagina", "don't get your twat in a knot", etc), but I must have grown up with and gone to college with a bunch of savages.

up
Voting closed 0

If you make a joke or snide comment, you're sexist and racist

Try this instead: if you make a racist or sexist joke or a racist or sexist snide comment, then you're.... umm... making a racist or sexist joke or snide comment. nothing more. The point, after all, would be to focus on the comment itself and not make inferences about the moral character of the person making it,.

up
Voting closed 0

n/t

up
Voting closed 0

Not everything is sexist or racist. Some comments are though and if one can't understand that, well, I am at a lost for words.

Did you mean to say you have heard women say worse things to other women 'cause I have never heard a woman say to a guy "don't get your twat in a knot."

But maybe I am just hanging around with the wrong crowd.

up
Voting closed 0

..

up
Voting closed 0

Are you seriously claiming that the comment

ANOTHER DUMB, HARVARD, F____K

is not, in fact, bigoted tribal bullshit?

up
Voting closed 0

But I'll claim it. Being a graduate and employee of Harvard is a lot different than being a woman, or African American, or handicapped, or gay, or Italian, or a lot of things. If it is a tribe, it is one by choice. This SOB made conscious decisions to attend and work at Harvard. It was his choice. The people who should be angry are Harvard folks, since this guy who is being an asshat and is both a graduate and employee of their institution. It is bad enough that we have stereotypes about them, but when someone comes around and acts like the personification of everything bad we think about the place, well, thankfully some HBS people are working on countering that.

up
Voting closed 0

It's true that unlike race, gender, etc., being associated with Harvard is still by choice, but there is still a world of difference between, on the one hand, someone who sees a car with New York plates parked in a crosswalk and thinks "New Yorkers sure are assholes," and, on the other, someone who sees the same car and thinks, "That guy sure is an asshole."

up
Voting closed 0

JPNative*. Your comment was uncalled for. Bob made a very good and important comment (and, as some Uhubers know, Bob and I don't always see eye to eye).

*Really?

up
Voting closed 0

"Edelman is the nephew of civil rights and education advocate Marian Wright Edelman"

Oh my god, how embarrassing for her.

up
Voting closed 0

Big division game this week, Pats need no distractions!

up
Voting closed 0

I think he's related to Ned Isakof.

up
Voting closed 0

I am a big fan of Julian.

up
Voting closed 0

Not that it excuses Edelman's behavior, but New York Magazine reports that Duan sent the emails to Boston.com, not Edelman.

up
Voting closed 0

To me it doesn't matter who sent it to Boston.com Dr. Tight Wad is still a douche canoe.

up
Voting closed 0

The author of the piece (and editor of boston.com) is also no paragon of journalistic virtue and the poster child for the page click mindset in today's internet "journalism" world

But putting that aside, the guy is still ridiculous

up
Voting closed 0

The author of the piece (and editor of boston.com) is also no paragon of journalistic virtue

If you think that boston.com hires journalistic virtue paragons, you haven't been reading (or avoiding) it enough.

up
Voting closed 0

I just saw the story on my newsfeed from The Independent in the UK.

up
Voting closed 0

What kind of fake apology is that?

"I'm sorry"? "I expect more from myself"?

Come on, buddy! You've gotta say "I apologize if you misunderstood me" and "we all learned to come together from this lesson" and "I will pray on this" and "please understand I had the best intentions".

But this...this is just an honest and real apology. They'd eat you alive in DC...and charge you $4 for the honor.

up
Voting closed 0