By adamg on Mon., 6/29/2015 - 6:15 am
Remains of the flag. Photo by Hkergrrl.
The Globe reports Melissa Carino took down a Confederate flag that had been draped over the memorial to the North's first black regiment last night after State and Boston Police declined to act, each saying the other was responsible for the historic marker across from the State House.
Topics:
Neighborhoods:
Free tagging:
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Attention hookers
By Lanny Budd
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 7:04am
Why do we give them the attention they want?
The statue of Hooker is Across The Street
By John Costello
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 7:25am
But more importantly the Staties and BPD were too frightened to act about vandalism on one of the most beautiful pieces of public art in this country over jurisdictional issues?
Really?
Besides the Common is Boston, not State property. It's been that way since 1634.
Please hammer out your differences children before someone gets hurt over who gets to watch the manhole on Tide Street while the cable guy checks the wires.
It wasn't about taking it down.
By Pete Nice
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 7:52am
It was about who takes the report, takes pictures for documentatoin, and which detectives follow up on the crime.
Boston Police in Past Cases
By anon
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 8:00am
"Boston officers took Dixon into custody near Tremont and Boylston streets, and arrested him after he was identified by the witnesses, police said."
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/04/10/rober...
"A Quincy woman described as mentally troubled threw paint on a historic Beacon Hill memorial Tuesday afternoon, also splattering a family visiting from Wisconsin, Boston police said."
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2012/08/01/woman...
Never ascribe to fear
By anon
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 8:00am
..that which can be explained by dithering and sclerotic process impositions.
Nevertheless
By John Costello
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 8:08am
BPD should know it is city property out of the gate.
Not always that easy.
By Pete Nice
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 8:20am
If a park is maintained by the national park service, or by some other agency other than the Boston public works, then often times that other police agency will take a police report. Even the Feds will often take up a case like this if its serious enough, if the property is federal, which I believe the statue is. But I actually believe the DCR maintains the statehouse grounds, and may be responsible for that small area across the street since it appears semi-attached to the state house grounds? I could be wrong though.
Either way, its not like the movies where cops are punching each other out and calling each other assholes over something like this. It usually takes a phone call and 10 minutes. Not that big of a deal.
Thanks Pete
By John Costello
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 8:28am
I appreciate your clarity and the Seaport should be yours.
You mean 'The Depahted' wasn't based on fact?
By dmcboston
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 8:59am
"Either way, its not like the movies where cops are punching each other out and calling each other assholes over something like this."
Seems like not so many years ago I saw mounted police there. I assumed Park Rangers. They're City of Boston if I'm correct.
So, it's a cavalry charge into the huddled masses of defenseless MSP...
No, but really...what if it is a suspicious device?
If it were a bomb?
By Pete Nice
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 9:37am
Boston usually takes those because their bomb disposal unit can usually get there the fastest, but Transit has bomb detection dogs as well and those guys usually work well together. For stuff like that jurisdiction goes out the window, as the State police has jurisdiction anywhere for things like that, but someone from BPD would be making the decisions on a case like a bomb or suspicious device.
Where were you last week?
By itchy
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 10:00am
They were arguing jurisdiction over a bomb threat. Remember?
I don't know, their bomb unit
By MBTA SNAFU
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 10:58am
I don't know, their bomb unit is SUSPECT to me ever since that one bomb went off in Copley Square that almost took out Jeff Bridges.
Also, lite-brites.
By MattyC
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 11:52am
Also, lite-brites.
Oh, ya.
By dmcboston
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 12:30pm
I've seen them. Try to water cannon it open or put it in the truck and take it to Moon Island.
World Class, Baby!
By Scratchie
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 10:33am
In other words, "It's not my job, man."
Doesn't matter which police department has to deal.
By Irmo
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 11:24am
What's important is that the removal gets handled by people who know how to preserve that statue.
Guarantee you
By anon
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 8:05am
A progressive advocate put that flag there in order to 'highlight the issue of racism'.
This shit is getting tedious.
No, I guarantee you anon
By anon
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 8:57am
That you just pulled this opinion out of your bunghole. Now go back to reading WMD and watching Glenn Bag.
Nope, he was right!
By donny
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 5:01pm
Nope, he was right!
I think apologies are in
By Patricia
Tue, 06/30/2015 - 9:35am
I think apologies are in order.....
Hey Guys!
By TommyJeff
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 9:00am
Anon guarantees that he knows what's what. Also, get off his lawn.
You did?
By SwirlyGrrl
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 9:31am
Really?
Maybe, instead of calling the cops, we should simply invoke the name of Badass Bree. She'll show up immediately to politely capture the flag (and recite some scripture for us, too)!
Confederate flag first hung at SC State House by liberals
By O-FISH-L
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 1:35pm
You're right, I wouldn't be surprised if it was a "progressive advocate" who did this. After all, it was liberal Gov. Fritz Hollings (D) who first raised the Confederate flag above the S.C. State House in 1962. He was a best friend of the liberal lion Ted Kennedy. Shameful.
Lying as usual
By lbb
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 3:16pm
The process that raised the rebel loser flag over the SC state house was an act of the SC legislature and did not go through the governor. Shameful? Aren't you ashamed of lying?
Re: Democrats and the Confederate flag. Let me educate you.
By O-FISH-L
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 3:42pm
Facts are stubborn things.
Yes
By MostlyHarmless
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 4:07pm
Many Democrats, particularly southern Democrats back when such a thing still existed, were often super racist. In fact, lots of people - I might even say most - in American history were super racist.
And?
A gift
By Michael
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 3:17pm
For you
So you're saying this is a...
By norp
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 3:19pm
So you're saying this is a.....false flag?
budump ching!
NAH NAH NAH NAH NAH !!!!!!
By anon
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 6:10pm
I WAS CORRECT! IT WAS EXACTLY AS I SAID, a 'progressive' wanted to make a statement about racism.
;)
hey man
By TommyJeff
Tue, 06/30/2015 - 2:12am
Nailed it.
My apologies.
Good thing we got rid of the Capitol Police then, eh?
By Brian Riccio
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 8:21am
I could see them showing up and just getting laughed at. Even by the racist.
Well...
By dmcboston
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 8:52am
...jurisdictional dispute. OK.
Glad it wasn't a backpack with wires hanging out of it...
I'm thinking they really have to work something out.
Misleading headline
By aldos
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 9:16am
"Citizen forced to remove..." makes it sound like the police caught the person who did it and made him or her take it down. The citizen wasn't forced to do anything, she could have left it there if she had wanted.
Unclear headline
By John-W
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 9:21am
I think Adam's implication here is that the delay caused by the jurisdictional confusion resulted in no law enforcement officer taking the thing down when it was discovered, so it sat there for a while. Therefore the citizen was "forced to remove it" because no appropriate personnel was doing it. Adam, please correct me if I'm reading you wrong.
Nothing, Compared To WGBH's Misleading Coverage Of The Story
By Elmer
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 3:25pm
Their radio local news "coverage" of the story made absolutely no mention of the jurisdictional dispute. They totally implied it was Melissa who put up the flag in the first place!
Once again, I'm reminded how thankful I am for Universal Hub!
And WBUR's Boeri
By moxie
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 6:23pm
He's head and shoulders above the children employed by 'GBH on real local news. (Don't get me started on Calle Crossley and Kara Miller. How's that affirmative action/protected class thing working out for us so far?)
If I want local daytime reporting that's where I go first.
Takes a special kind of dumb
By Michael
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 9:20am
To not only besmirch an important monument like this, but to do so with the emblem of a group that lost to them. Like waving a Seahawks flag at the Pats' parade (if you could actually get to the parade anyway), only a million times dumber.
Looks like a bomb to me
By SwirlyGrrl
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 9:25am
Now that would be a good drill. Send in the robot to capture and contain it. Blow it up elsewhere.
to whoever put it up in the first place
By Malcolm Tucker
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 4:18pm
I sincerely hope your dick rots off. I hope you have no friends, and you're lonely and sad for the rest of your shitty little life - unless of course you somehow see the error of your ways, and work on repenting and being a good person for a change...but I highly doubt you're capable of anything so monumental. Please seek counseling.EDIT: consider the above comment to be too vitriolic for what the yahoo who's claimed responsibility had to say for himself. Given these new circumstances, I would instead like to advise Mr. Allsop not to use a racist symbol to make a point about racism being over, or whatever the hell he thought he was doing.
You really think a potty
By anon
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 10:32am
You really think a potty mouthed comment on UHub is going to influence let alone reach someone pulling stupid stunts like that?
"potty mouth"?
By lbb
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 11:35am
Romper Room called, Miss Connie. They need you back on the job, please, not commenting on uhub.
sorry, I'll put a quarter in the swear jar
By Malcolm Tucker
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 11:43am
You really think I care about the opinions of an anon who objects to salty language? No, I don't think it will reach him, or that he'll care, but hey - just in case, I'm letting him know he's trash.
You are just as 'anon' as the 'anon'
By anon
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 12:41pm
your snark is directed at. I recall an earlier post you made referring to the fact your name really isn't 'Malcolm Tucker'. I'm shocked....shocked.
uh huh
By Malcolm Tucker
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 4:11pm
It's true. I'm the whippoorwill that cries in the night, the gentle breeze that caresses your lovely face.
How do you know it's a guy?
By relaxyapsycho
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 1:15pm
n/t
Agreed, lets wrap ol Dixie
By gotdatwmd
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 1:37pm
Agreed, lets wrap ol Dixie over the problematic toxicity that is the rampant sexism of anonymous UHub comments.
wild guess
By Malcolm Tucker
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 4:14pm
but it sounds like, so far, one man has 'fessed up.
Well
By bulgingbuick
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 10:28am
as the Confederate Battle flag represents a cultural symbol of the Antebellum South and in light of SCOTUS actions last week, along with home 'schoolin', rednecks believe they can now legally marry their sisters.
... I'm okay with this.
By Irmo
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 11:22am
Putting the flag at that spot makes it look like a captured trophy.
Certainly less offensive than flying it at the Common the way that Tea Party rally did.
The Gasden flag and Navy Jack
By anon
Mon, 06/29/2015 - 12:34pm
The Gasden flag and Navy Jack aren't confederate but colonial era symbols.
Pages