Hey, there! Log in / Register

The CARS ONLY sign must have made quite the sound when it hit the top of the truck

Truck stuck on Storrow Drive

Kara Sassone shows us the reason Soldiers Field Road is backed up onto Storrow Drive this morning. Or as she puts it:

Thanks. Thanks a lot.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

At the time I passed it going the other way the backup was less than half a mile, but I would think it would pile up pretty quickly.

up
Voting closed 0

I drove by it this morning too, there was no meaningful backup on the eastbound side.

up
Voting closed 0

Ya, I went by at 7. At the time it was closer to the bridge and was blocking a lane. By the time this picture was taken it seems to have made it back to a pulloff.

up
Voting closed 0

This seems to happen to Kara a lot. In fact, I recognized her name from all the times Adam has RT'ed her Storrowing pictures.

up
Voting closed 0

That's because she's a regular Storrow commuter, at that early hour when truck drivers forget how to read.

up
Voting closed 0

Count me in the camp that marvels at the stupidity of some truck drivers and who wants to keep storrow drive truck-free, but...

looks like the truck is pulled over, not blocking traffic? So the backup must be drivers slowing down to take pictures of the truck and post on instagram/facebook/whatever about it, right?

up
Voting closed 0

The truck isn't pulled over on a shoulder, that white line that ends represents the merge point of an onramp that the truck is blocking. This would cause significant traffic obstruction.

up
Voting closed 0

From the photo, it's pulled over on that cutout right before the BU bridge and the exit to BU, much further down from the onramp from Cambridge Street, so it wouldn't be blocking the travel lanes.

up
Voting closed 0

Picture must be from later because I went by around 7ish and the truck was half in/half out of the right hand lane.

Another professionally licensed driver I'm assuming?

up
Voting closed 0

if these truck drivers realize the inconvenience they cost a few thousand people late to work. All because they can't read signs.

up
Voting closed 0

Oh no, god forbid someone inconveniences you on your commute. As if Boston roads are free-flowing rainbows of happiness without these truck drivers.

up
Voting closed 0

Yes, let's take all the warning signs down. Disband the police! Cry havoc and let loose the trucks of war!

up
Voting closed 0

These are commercial truck drivers, and there are height limit signs everywhere. They should know better. This is a completely avoidable occurrence and people have a right to be mad about it.

up
Voting closed 0

Driver from Georgia passes a gazillion "Low Clearance" signs on the interstate, all of which indicate a clearance higher than the top of their truck.

Same driver now goes to enter Storrow Drive and sees sign indicating "Danger Low Clearance" but without the actual clearance stated on the sign. Do you really expect them to be a mind reader?

up
Voting closed 0

This truck would have had to have gotten on Storrow via Cambridge Street. Unfortunately there's no warning about the height restriction until you've already gone down that little side road next to the Doubletree: https://goo.gl/maps/9tid1vucyn52

Maybe if there were a warning up at Cambridge Street? Obviously that won't help for other entrance points, but it seems like that entrance is especially under-warned.

up
Voting closed 0

The problem with a warning at Cambridge St. is that there's an access road for Houghton Chemical and formerly the CSX yard. Many trucks used to use this entrace. There's never been decent signage for it. I'm sure that GPS use has made it even more confusing. If there were clear signs for trucks saying they can easily get back to Cambridge St., which they can from there, it would probably reduce the uncertainty for unfamiliar drivers. This is one of the more idiotic set-ups.

up
Voting closed 0

"NO TRUCKS
except to hotel and Houghton Chemical"

Problem solved.

up
Voting closed 0

or would that be too long?

up
Voting closed 0

while true, im nearly positive theres a road that loops around doubletree before getting on storrow proper.

up
Voting closed 0

I think it's still possible to take a right turn before you get on Storrow drive and swing around the back of the Doubletree to recover. It's not real obvious though.

up
Voting closed 0

One would think that truck drivers would learn to read the signs after so many incidents like this have happened? Where has common sense gone to? Out the window and by the wayside, that's where!

up
Voting closed 0

Read the signs? How quaint.

up
Voting closed 0

...but wouldn't it be possible to program GPS programs to warn against certain exits for certain size vehicles? I mean, you can get real-time traffic data. Why not set it so that, if you're in a big enough truck or bus, it doesn't even send you onto a road you're not supposed to drive on, and it starts yelling at you if you try to get onto that road?

I am neither a driver nor a computer programmer, so please don't yell at me too much. Just seems to make sense, since we all rely so heavily on our little glowing rectangles of information, to program them in such a way that some of these near-storrowings don't happen.

up
Voting closed 0

... that utilize information about relevant restrictions. See, for instance:

http://www.dieselboss.com/truck_gps_review_features.htm

If my livelihood involved driving trucks, I think it would be more than worth my while to have a GPS that would provide guidance that would avoid avoidable disasters.

up
Voting closed 0

One would expect the trucking companies to provide these units in their trucks, which cost orders of magnitude more than the units do.

up
Voting closed 0

it would be a requirement that the same level of information about roadway restrictions be provided in ALL GPS units.

up
Voting closed 0

Certainly wouldn't help with the Google Maps problem, though.

If trucking companies provided the commercial GPS and demanded that drivers use that, it would go far further than demanding units not in use carry information that wouldn't be used.

up
Voting closed 0

Not cheap, but not outrageously expensive either. Especially when you consider the other costs associated with running a truck.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.teletype.smarttruckrou...

up
Voting closed 0

Car drivers have no need for this info (unless they are renting a truck -- in which case they should have to rent a truck-specific GPD as well). And GPS providers of truck-related info have a lot more legwork to do to gather (an keep current) the relevant information.

up
Voting closed 0

Truck inspection stations on the highways would be open and do random spot checks on which GPS unit the driver uses and USDOT would include GPS checkouts they way they require logbooks and break periods etc etc.

up
Voting closed 0