Attorney General Maura Healey today announced an end to a loophole she said had let gun makers continue to sell high-powered weaponry in Massachusetts.
Under an "enforcement order" issued yesterday, Healey has banned the sale of "copycat" weapons that had the same functionality as the AR-15 and AK-47 but which were not specifically named in the state law banning the sale of assault weapons.
Some 10,000 of these weapons were purchased in Massachusetts last year, Healey said in a statement.
The Massachusetts assault weapons ban mirrors the federal ban that expired in 2004. It prohibits the sale of specific and name-brand weapons and explicitly bans copies or duplicates of those weapons. Gun manufacturers, however, make and market what they call “state compliant†versions with minor tweaks to various parts of the weapon. Copycat guns are sold, for example, without a flash suppressor or with a fixed instead of folding stock. These changes do not make the weapon any less lethal and the weapons remain illegal.
The AG’s notice clarifies what constitutes a copy or duplicate weapon by outlining two tests. Under the tests, a weapon is a copy or duplicate if its internal operating system is essentially the same as those of a specifically-banned weapon or if the gun has key functional components that are interchangeable with those of a banned weapon.
The notice also states that assault weapons prohibited under state law, as manufactured, cannot be altered in any way to make their sale or possession legal in Massachusetts.
The notice makes clear that the guidance will not be enforced against gun owners who bought or sold these weapons prior to July 20, 2016.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
A piston operated AR15 has
By DPM
Fri, 07/22/2016 - 3:17pm
A piston operated AR15 has very little in common with an AK.
It seems to be the AGs argument EVERY semi auto firearm is illegal. You are good with that?
Every firearm that operates with a piston
Every firearm that is gas impingement
Every firearm that is blowback.
All banned. No 1911s, no Garands, no Saigas, no semi auto birdguns produced after 94. Of course the law states nothing of the sort and the AG can get bent.
Mission Accomplished!
By Marsha Coakley
Wed, 07/20/2016 - 7:45pm
A few positive headlines in the state's Democratic newsletter. Some tummy rubbing for low-fo voters. Zero impact on limiting large capacity detachable magazine weapons.
Good job, Maura!
guns aside
By anon
Thu, 07/21/2016 - 10:50am
Whether or not you care about guns at all, you should be outraged by this overreach and complete absence of due process. You want something changed, there should be a bill signed in to law. This is scary and way bigger than firearms.
overreach
By Chris Lynch
Thu, 07/21/2016 - 2:07pm
I think you have to make the argument this order is overreach based on the authorities of the office and the law on the books. Her order is saying the intent of the law on the books was to stop the sales of these weapons too. The AG's office is specifically empowered with consumer protection.
Her order can be challenged in court. I think Gun Owners of America/NRA will if they think her order is on weak legal authority.
What's your argument?
The AG is claiming that ALL
By DPM
Fri, 07/22/2016 - 8:40am
The AG is claiming that ALL firearms that share common parts and operating systems are now banned. That means things like the M1 Garand (shares parts with the M14) and even 10/22 plinking guns are now a felony to posses. Also all semi auto pistols are now banned by this ruling.
If all MA gun owners are now felons why should we follow the law?
Weak legal authority? Without a doubt.
If all MA gun owners are now felons why should we follow the law
By Kaz
Fri, 07/22/2016 - 1:57pm
Have you sped on the highway?
So, then what keeps you from running over pedestrians downtown?
If my firearm is already a
By DPM
Fri, 07/22/2016 - 3:17pm
If my firearm is already a felony to posses why would I care about the mags?
The two are not equivalent. There is no victim of modern instead of 30 year old magazines.
If the AG decides to prosecute we are all going to jail for a while. Might as well make it worthwhile.
The AG is claiming that ALL
By DPM
Fri, 07/22/2016 - 8:51am
Double tap
Legislators need to fix this
By Anony- Mouse
Thu, 07/21/2016 - 12:43pm
They made a law that defines an AW. She should not be able to arbitrarily change that definition.
By the way, this is the same legislature that set up the wonderful taxi regulatory rules, and won't allow Boston to establish it's own speed limits or liquor licenses.
Your elected reps really just aren't very good at their jobs.
Why bother following ANY MA
By DPM
Fri, 07/22/2016 - 8:26am
Why bother following ANY MA gun law if we are all already felons in waiting for Healey to decide to prosecute us?
Pmags here I come!
Why follow any law at all?
By Kaz
Fri, 07/22/2016 - 1:58pm
You're free to commit murder now that you're a de facto felon, right?
Because a piece of plastic
By DPM
Fri, 07/22/2016 - 2:58pm
Because a piece of plastic with a metal spring is equivalent to murder.
The state can arrest 200k people at will at this point for firearms laws. Why should we at this point care about the law? We are already felons.
Pages
Add comment