Curt Schilling: Jews so stupid, amirite? No, really, why are they so dumb? he asks.
Topics:
Free tagging:
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:Curt Schilling: Jews so stupid, amirite? No, really, why are they so dumb? he asks.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:Copyright by Adam Gaffin and by content posters.
Advertise | About Universal Hub | Contact | Privacy
Comments
Party pooper
By Sock_Puppet
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 1:57pm
I was so looking forward to more mansplaining. Do you think he will at least have a YouTube channel!?
That's what we said about Trump
By erik g
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 1:57pm
The state GOP will hold primaries, unless they want their base to turn on them. The same bunch of people who gave Trump a win in the MA primaries are still out there, merrily polishing their gun barrels and reading Breitbart stories about how Hillary is already organizing the FEMA death camps. What makes you think they won't vote for the dumber, more anti-Semitic sports hero over an establishment Republican?
Well, you could vote in the Republican primary
By Roman
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 2:23pm
for a strong candidate if you're unaffiliated or you could hope to God that only the nuts will so Warren doesn't have a strong challenger.
Reasoning
By Irma la Douce
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 2:28pm
1) The party will recruit a more palatable candidate in the Scott Brown/Charlie Baker mode
2) Those voters who supported Trump have (hopefully) learned a valuable lesson by now
3) The whole Rhode Island mess is close enough and recent enough to detract significantly from the now-distant sports hero thing.
Not to quibble but...
By anon
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 4:25pm
Scott Brown supports Trump. Charlie Baker emphatically does not. Not sure they are of similar mold.
In regards to failed businesses
By BlackKat
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 7:13pm
That did not stop Trump from getting nominated. Or Bush Jr. for that matter. So not holding a lot of faith that any future candidates would be affected by similar foibles.
Go Away Curt...
By B
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 2:50pm
Thanks for the World Series. At this juncture, I am so sick of this guy that I would almost trade the World Series win for him to just disappear from the radar. He totally screwed Rhode Island with 38 Studios and he just generally sucks. To be fair, his question did appear somewhat sincere but he's a sketchball. Schilling for Pres? God help us all.
Native American Life Expectancy
By O-FISH-L
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 3:17pm
At 67, Elizabeth Warren should retire and enjoy her golden years, especially since Native American life expectancy is shorter than other Americans. As for Schilling's comments, the question has been asked for years, why do Jews continue to vote Democrat? He said nothing that hasn't been said before, including by many Jews themselves. As for Trump TV, I'm amazed it hasn't happened already, ratings would be off the charts. Trump is filling sports stadiums and Hillary can't even fill an elementary school auditorium. With the likes of Megyn Kelly, Britt Hume, Chris Wallace etc. attacking Trump, Fox has become more of the same. Great to see Sean Hannity now consistently leading the ratings, the only person at Fox who has been strong Trump.
Cool string of non-sequiturs
By ZachAndTired
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 3:50pm
Forget to take your medicine?
True.
By anon
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 4:14pm
SJWs have taken over Fox. Trump + Hannity + Breitbart should start a new station and be on the look out for SJW entryists like Megyn.
Note to non-crazies:
By CopleyScott17
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 5:02pm
"SJW" stands for Social Justice Warriors, which apparently is an insult among people who think social justice is a bad thing.
Rule of law, please
By Roman
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 7:50pm
In America, there's only one kind of justice: legal justice, and it's supposed to apply evenly to everyone from all walks of life.
"Social justice" is a synonym for mob rule. Damned right it's an insult.
So you don't think it's
By ZachAndTired
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 9:06pm
So you don't think it's possible for there to be unjust laws?
If they're applied uniformly
By Roman
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 10:32pm
then everyone gets fucked over equally and has an equal interest in seeing those laws repealed.
If the laws are riddled with exceptions so that Favored Group A gets a right that Unfavored Group B doesn't...then that's a problem because it creates a mechanism by which politicians can buy votes and abuse the instruments of government for their personal gain.
I'm not sure why this basic tenet of liberal democracy gets lost on you liberals.
Um
By boo_urns
Sun, 10/23/2016 - 1:51am
Isn't this what the book "The New Jim Crow" (published in 2010) was modeled upon?
Only to the point
By Roman
Sun, 10/23/2016 - 1:59am
that I'm agreeing that laws should be enforced uniformly.
OK, but, you know, they're not
By boo_urns
Mon, 10/24/2016 - 12:07am
So I don't really know how your "equitable laws are enforced inequitably but should be" argument holds water. Who are the people you're voting for that are championing this? Or, at least give me examples of those who are pushing us towards that direction? I get the impression that those you vote for fall on the right side of the Y axis; at least those who fall closer to center if not maybe a little bit closer to the right or further to the left (yeah that's a nod to Clinton) are mentioning such measures, but not so much from most if not all conservative contenders this time around.
It just seems disingenuous to say "of course I feel like laws should be equitably enforced" when you (again, generally "you", not specifically "you") support candidates that don't make that a priority. Maybe even more than "seems."
Of course
By SwirlyGrrl
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 9:13pm
I assume that this means that you will stop whining about Miranda rights, marriage equality, poll tax prohibitions, Roe v Wade, Brown v Board of Education, Loving v Virginia, the strike down of anti sodomy laws, Obamacare, etc.
And when did I whine about any of those?
By Roman
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 10:14pm
Well, except Obamacare. But explain to me how that one is a constitutional right the way voting and right to counsel are?
Because
By SwirlyGrrl
Sun, 10/23/2016 - 7:20pm
It was passed by congress.
It was signed by POTUS.
It was cleared by SCOTUS as not conflicting with the Constitution.
Doesn't get much more rule of law than that.
Perhaps you should spend some time exploring the concepts of case law and the interactions between the Executive Branch, Legislative Branch, and Judiciary.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyeJ55o3El0[/youtube]
Fox is now part of the left wing conspiracy now
By anon
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 4:39pm
Wow Oafish, you are a piece of work.
They spent the better part of
By anon
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 5:00pm
They spent the better part of the primary trying to bring Trump down.
No they didn't
By adamg
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 5:16pm
Trump and Kelly even made up.
Maybe in some made for TV
By anon
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 9:17pm
Maybe in some made for TV moment. You actually believed that?
Silly Adam, don't you understand?
By CopleyScott17
Sun, 10/23/2016 - 3:26am
When they fought it was real, but when they made up it was fake! See how fun and easy it is to live in Conspiracy World? "Think it. Say it. Poof! It's true!"
Have to agree with the anon that replied to you...
By boo_urns
Sun, 10/23/2016 - 1:53am
Maybe I'm missing something, but the impression I got was that Kelly's arm was twisted to the point where she was forced to eat crow in talking with Trump. Because, you know, this election season, "not being very nice [to Trump]" was somehow bad journalism despite the reality of him perhaps not deserving "not very nice" treatment.
Sad rally.
By Kokernutz
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 9:17pm
Curt Schilling's rally today on City Hall Plaza was a complete disaster. Sad!
https://twitter.com/tedcooper/status/7898798772225...
That is hilarious. What a sad
By MattyC
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 9:42pm
That is hilarious. What a sad human being.
Was it Curt's rally?
By anon
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 9:50pm
I came across an event page on Facebook. It is referred to as a #HerLiesMatter rally:
https://www.facebook.com/events/196245867479917/
Curt is not listed in the description. Was he pimping it on radio? It seems he was just an invited speaker to a poorly advertised rally. Just judging by the event page, it is not surprising that people 1) didn't come out, and 2) didn't come out in the rain.
You want a serious answer, perhaps?
By Ron Newman
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 6:42pm
Jews like me support liberal Democrats because we're a minority group, and we feel our rights are best protected by being in an alliance with many other minority groups.
Well put, Ron
By anon
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 7:24pm
I'm not in a minority group but I'm a fairly liberal Democrat because I want everyone's rigthts protected as well.
And a serious rebuttal, for completess
By Roman
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 7:58pm
Jews like me support a large subset of the (pre Trump) Republican platform because we believe in limited government, individual liberty, and a rigidly uniformly applied rule of law.
I personally am categorically opposed to any kind of identity politics in the public sphere on the grounds that unlike the Old World, America is a place where you can come and shed the baggage of your past and your ethnicity and blend the fuck in.
Other Jews that are more religious than myself may support some of the religious-right aspects of the Republican platform. Some believe in a muscular foreign policy. Some are gun nuts. We can be a diverse bunch.
To you and Ron Newman.
By anon
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 9:30pm
Tying this in to the original question which generated all these comments, where does Israel fit into your political beliefs?
What are your beliefs towards Israel? Where do those beliefs rank among your other beliefs?
Speaking for me only
By Roman
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 10:28pm
and not for the other five million American Jews...
The Israelis are the good guys in the same way we are the good guys. Small-d democratic, deeply seated Western-oriented culture, mostly codified and enforced laws protecting personal and economic freedoms. Our interests and theirs ought to land on the same side most of the time because of those cultural commonalities and ideological ties.
Israel
By Ron Newman
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 10:54pm
I'm for a two-state solution and I'm against the Likud and all of the right-wing Israeli parties that are allied with Likud. None of which has much relevance to my choice between a competent, unexciting center-left Democrat and an ignorant, boorish, egotistical, megalomaniacal narcissistic oaf.
I'm a US citizen, not an Israeli citizen. I vote on the basis of what I think is best for the US.
False choice
By Ron Newman
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 10:56pm
[quote]America is a place where you can come and shed the baggage of your past and your ethnicity and blend the fuck in.[/quote]
Why can't I do both? Assimilate into American culture and keep my Jewish customs?
Assimilation didn't save the European Jews in the 1930s-40s, by the way.
There's a fine line
By Roman
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 11:43pm
between keeping your culture (all for that) and treating yourself as an outsider (not at all for that). If there were an easy way to describe what I mean in a few words, I'd be a rich man, but I'll give it a shot.
So let's say I come from a Mumble country, and I want to patronize (or set up) a Mumble-goods store and consume Mumble-language media. And I want to make sure my kids learn to speak Mumble. And I want to socialize with other Mumblers. Well...so far so good. We all have freedom of association, and freedom of speech, and freedom of commerce. And so long as my Mumble store serves everyone who comes through the door, no problems. That's keeping your culture.
The problems can start to crop up when I associate exclusively with other Mumblers. And I don't mean family or friends...that's natural and mostly harmless. I mean that I refuse to patronize non-Mumble businesses. Not just for specialty items like books or newspapers or foods, but for everything. I won't buy a gallon of paint unless it's Mumble paint. I won't let a non-Mumbler work on my car. I won't work at a non-Mumble establishment. That's where there can be room for problems.
And the other thing that I take personal exception to and think is a recipe for disaster is identity block politics. The idea that if I'm a Mumbler and I think there ought to be a law about X, then I have to get other Mumblers to gang up with me to influence policy. If it's something positive, for lack of a better word, then sure...why not. But what sometimes can happen with certain ethno-centric political organization is that it's not positive, it's asking for a hard change and setting up a confrontation of an us and a them where one side is all ethnic and the other side is the Them that isn't Us. And ethnic pride is used as a call to arms to drum up signatures or votes or whatever.
My own belief is that it's not healthy for people to blatantly telegraph their otherness to the rest of society by refusing to engage with them. So while it's OK for me to patronize Mumble businesses, I shouldn't do so exclusively. While it's OK to send my kids to Mumbler schools, I shouldn't discourage them from making non-Mumbler friends. I shouldn't refuse to consume media in English and I shouldn't demand government services in Mumble.
While any one or just a few of those things can be perfectly benign, taken together, it can create divisions between people who should view themselves as fellow citizens. It can build a psychological wall between you and your neighbor. And that's dangerous because walls in the head are the seeds for walls in real life.
Assimilation isn't the same thing as blending. So you have your holidays and schools and shops and friends and language. But you shouldn't wall yourself off from society at large on the grounds that they aren't your people. You
should engage with your fellow Americans and you should have more in common with them ideologically and philosophically than not, so that when you look at each other, he doesn't see some Jew and you don't see some Anglo, but you see your neighbor and fellow citizen. It's about mutual respect for the fragile underpinnings of civilized society.
Did that make any sense?
I'm always going to be an "outsider"
By Ron Newman
Sun, 10/23/2016 - 12:09am
if I live in a country where 80+% of the people are Christians, observing Christian holidays. And I'm fine with that, as long as I'm not compelled to participate in Christian practices (such as prayers in public schools, for instance).
Yes and no.
By Roman
Sun, 10/23/2016 - 12:27am
Everyone can claim some sort of otherness. Irish, Italians, Swedes, Chinese, Koreans, Mormons, whatever. The point is that on the really basic basics, we should pretty much agree and not revel in how far away from that center off mass we are.
No, it didn't make any sense
By anon
Mon, 10/24/2016 - 1:09am
What a bunch of long winded nonsense.
What US citizens and immigrants "should" do is be law-abiding.
Full stop.
A real world primary match up scenario.
By anon
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 9:24pm
Curt Schilling vs Gabriel Gomez.
Gomez ran against Markey in the special election for Kerry's seat in 2013. Here is an archive of his issues page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140227234414/http://...
This is for everyone who isn
By bibliotequtress...
Sat, 10/22/2016 - 10:06pm
This is for everyone who isn't quite sure Schilling is an idiot here:
http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/04/a-12-year-history-...
His idiotic tweet from August
By anon
Sun, 10/23/2016 - 12:35pm
His idiotic tweet from August 2015 was followed by a year of horrific acts of terror.
Can we agree...
By dpalomares
Sun, 10/23/2016 - 9:57am
If his number is retired at Fenway park that the day of the event that he should be duct tape to a chair along with him mouth?
Brietbart Curt
By anon
Sun, 10/23/2016 - 8:45pm
Oh boy. This should be fun. Another lunatic in the asylum.
http://deadspin.com/report-curt-schilling-to-pick-...
Pages
Add comment