Around 9:15 p.m. by a black man, who jumped into a purple, 1999 Corolla, Mass. 2JG-D90, headed outbound. About 10 minutes later, a man in that car was stopped at Centre and Cedar streets in Roxbury.
Neighborhoods:
Topics:
Free tagging:
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Let me guess
By SwirlyGrrl
Thu, 02/13/2014 - 9:59pm
They followed the tracks in the slush on the street.
Good
By Will LaTulippe
Thu, 02/13/2014 - 10:44pm
Execute the piece of crap for pulling a gun on somebody who didn't have a gun and then rent out where he lives to somebody who's on their way to being priced out of another Boston neighborhood.
Seriously, executing the 1,000 worst Bostonians would go a long way to improving quality of life in Boston.
No
By Michael Kerpan
Thu, 02/13/2014 - 11:00pm
Just no.
Your schtick is getting really, really stale.
I hope he never pulls a gun on you at your workplace
By Will LaTulippe
Thu, 02/13/2014 - 11:36pm
I'm on your side, pal.
No
By Michael Kerpan
Thu, 02/13/2014 - 11:49pm
You're not.
Well, at least we agree
By Will LaTulippe
Fri, 02/14/2014 - 2:55am
On NBC's Olympic coverage.
Not watching the Olympics
By Michael Kerpan
Fri, 02/14/2014 - 8:18am
Sporting events coordinated by an international criminal consortium don't interest me.
With friends ("friend") like
By anon
Fri, 02/14/2014 - 1:36am
With friends ("friend") like you, who needs enemies?
Will LaTulippe visits different websites
By Nick
Fri, 02/14/2014 - 12:04am
"Those Arabs over there are so barbaric!"
"China executes people for minor crimes, unlike us Americans who value life and liberty."
"You may disagree with some of his decisions, but Ronald Reagan was a great man."
And this website, maybe next Sunday:
"We should execute anyone that appears to be a murderous thug!"
Extreme Interpretation Sharia Law
By SwirlyGrrl
Fri, 02/14/2014 - 7:18am
I'm sure he'd find it somewhat satisfying, but not quite cruel enough.
Execute?
By anon
Fri, 02/14/2014 - 9:35am
No need for that, but locking up the gun-toting, heroin-peddling gangbangers once caught instead of letting them out on personal recognizance or laughably low bail hoping they will return to court a year later just might to the trick. I guarantee the top 100 worst thugs currently roaming the streets are all out on bail or parole.
Lame on 2 counts
By KellyJMF
Fri, 02/14/2014 - 11:44am
1) Innocent until proven guilty means the government can't just lock up everyone it arrests until their trial rolls around.
2) Are you honestly willing to pay the kind of increased taxes necessary to house and feed everyone who is arrested from the time of arrest until the end of their trial? Plus the costs of taking care of any dependents that person supports? And good luck getting back to their job if they are finally found not guilty so more unemployment. Etc.
If we're going that route, how about we start with the drunk drivers.
Lame?
By anon
Fri, 02/14/2014 - 12:53pm
1) Thug caught in the process of shooting/stabbing someone or selling heroin to neighborhood kids should not be released on a $500 bail.
2) We're already paying to house/clothe/feed them - are you really delusional enough to believe thugs who make uhub news on a daily basis are, aside from that one isolated incident when they got shooty/stabby, hard-working, rent-paying, law-abiding citizens? Locking them up is much cheaper than section 8/welfare/food stamps and $1 million hospital visits every few years when they shoot someone or get shot.
Add comment