By adamg on Sun., 12/17/2017 - 11:24 pm
WFXT reports Mayor Walsh has signed a City Council proposal that will prohibit local stores from using those thin plastic bans and will require a 5-cent fee for recyclable bags made of thicker plastic or paper.
City Councilors Matt O'Malley (Jamaica Plain, West Roxbury) and Michelle Wu (at large), who proposed the ban, said it would help the environment, curb an ugly part of the current streetscape, reduce the use of oil and save the city money - in terms of reduced trash pickups and costs for removing the stuff from the city's recycling stream.
Stores will keep the new 5-cent fee.
Boston residents currently use 357 million of the bags each year, O'Malley estimates.
Neighborhoods:
Free tagging:
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
I would like to be the first
By J
Sun, 12/17/2017 - 11:25pm
I would like to be the first to welcome Boston into the progressive city club of 2012.
That's the club where I use
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 12:53am
That's the club where I use the same amount of plastic or more, but now I have to go out of my way to buy bathroom bin liners and litter box scoop bags? Super.
CA is stuck with a whole generation of homes required to use those idiotic mercury-based CFL fixtures but let's pretend those are better than LED bulbs in standard sockets...
The intentions are admirable but the actual implementation is so incredibly dumb.
The fact that there will now
By J
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 9:50am
The fact that there will now be a cost on the use means youre going to think a lot more carefully about how many you use.
AKA, use goes down.
And again, Boston is very late to the party, so just ask one of the hundreds of cities, states or countries that already banned them years ago and have actual data.
BTW: You do realize that you can use an incandescent, CFL, or LED in the same socket right...?
Yes and No on Sockets
By Saddlebrook7
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 10:35am
For a while California banned the sale of light fixtures that accept the old "Edison" screw in base, requiring instead a bayonet mount. This was their way of making incandescent bulbs impossible to use. The state has since rescinded the ban, but there are a lot of fixtures out there now that can't take anything but these two-prong CFL's.
It cant be hard to replace
By J
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 11:01am
It cant be hard to replace the fixture or buy a compatible LED bulb.
My extended family all lives in California. My mom is in a home built in 2006. I have never heard of any of this being an issue.
I know her bathrooms all take the circular fluorescent lights like this...
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/5...
But she simply bought an LED light that fits in the same fixture with the same circular shape. Obviously, if the standard was to install that type of outlet, they developed bulbs that fit into it.
You do realize that you can
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 10:36am
Except you can't. The "Energy Star" fixtures made since the 1990's and 2000's have a cheapie magnetic fluorescent ballast hardwired into them. Instead of having a screw-in Edison socket, they have one those clippy type sockets for bipin-base bent-tube CFL "refills". Today those bulbs are hard to find, expensive, and inferior to LED in every way.
The idea was that it would prevent the homeowner from ever installing an incandescent lamp in the CFL fixture. But even when those fixtures were brand new, you were better off using a screw-in CFL in a non Energy Star fixture. Better light, better ballast, easier to maintain, and better light pattern.
Tote Life
By BlackKat
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 10:21am
You know it's pretty simple to just bring a tote bag or two to the store with you, and they make you look cool too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD0gDC3WuJg
says you
By johnmcboston
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 11:30am
AN answer given by either (a) someone who owns a car and can keep many reusable bags there or (b) someone who only buys groceries by going from home to the store and back again.
Not everyone can carry reusable bags around with them 24/7 in case they might need to stop in a store.
I carry plastic bags in my
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 11:44am
I carry plastic bags in my backpack. I can use them to get a full load of groceries home on foot or by bicycle.
Because of this ban, once they wear out I'll be out of luck. Unless I make the effort to stockpile some when I visit another city where they're allowed.
I carry reusable bags
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 12:02pm
You can get some from IKEA very cheap that fold into little tiny packets when not in use. I carry one in a small purse, even.
Don't know how you get more than a use or two out of the cheap ones - which is why I carry the real ones.
Chicobags!
By SuperChingon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 1:25pm
Chico bags (and other companies im sure) have you in mind and make stuffable, reusable shopping bags that can fit in small pockets or on key chains when not in use. I keep one in my bag for when I randomly run into a farmers market in a new town or for spur of the moment grocery trips.
https://www.chicobag.com/category-reusable-shoppin...
Each one stuffs down to a
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 5:18pm
Each one stuffs down to a pouch the size of an egg. How many $19.99 egg-sized bags would I have to put on my keychain to carry a full load of groceries? I would have quite a bulge in my pants pocket.
says you
By lbb
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 11:47am
An answer given by someone who has never actually used a reusable bag, and who thinks for some reason that they're the size and heft of an Army duffle.
That's like saying "Not everyone can carry an umbrella in case it might rain". You either can and do, or you can't or won't and you get wet. In that situation, grownups say, "Yeah, shoulda thought of that" and learn from it, and children scream "WAAAH! WAAAH! WAAAH! WHY DOESN'T THE WORLD GIVE ME AN UMBRELLA WHEN I NEED ONE AND VANISH IT WHEN I DON'T NEED IT ANYMORE???"
I can and I do
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 12:56pm
I don't own a car and the plastic bags are not good for walking around the city with.
I carry little bags that fold up into a little packet, carry more than the plastic ones, don't break and I can wash them. It isn't rocket science.
Not everyone...
By XenaKat
Tue, 12/19/2017 - 3:26pm
Not everyone gives in to the impulse to go grocery shopping *RIGHT NOW.* Some of us are able to plan ahead and only buy things when we have planned ahead and brought bags with us.
Not everyone will suffer a severe financial crisis by paying five or ten cents for a bag when we do give in to impulse purchasing, and we recognise that these nickels and dimes are a nuisance fee designed to teach us to plan ahead. Kind of like the "swear jar" that some people had as kids growing up...it didn't stop you from swearing, but it taught you when it was and was not an appropriate time to do so.
And for the record, I do not own a car and likely never will given my extremely poor eyesight. And fairly often I go to the grocery store straight from work, but, hey...I PLAN AHEAD and bring my reusable bags to work with me that day. Then I'm only annoyed by carrying them with me just every so often, instead of being annoyed by them all day every day like people who can't plan.
Try 2008 or earlier
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 9:34am
All of Ireland banned the blight in that era.
And then their economy collapsed
By Waquiot
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 3:57pm
And it has yet to fully recover.
Are you trying to insinuate that the economic struggles
By zetag
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 4:02pm
of Ireland are due to the lack of free plastic bags?
I mean, there is a correlation
By Waquiot
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 6:07pm
And since Blindboy Boatclub of the Rubberbandits does provide analysis on how the bulk of the Irish populace got screwed during the downturn and have got jack shitall during the “recovery†while wearing a plastic shopping bag over his head, there might be something to it. But probably no causation. Probably.
Good!
By Brian Riccio
Sun, 12/17/2017 - 11:39pm
Now when will Walsh sign that ban into effect that stops Dunkie's from putting the plastic cup inside the Styrofoam one because that's the way Tami likes her lahge regalah iced with five Splendah's?
Seriously though
By eo-pal
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 10:09am
Those freaking cups are a blight on Boston's sidewalks and snow banks
What's next on the ban-wagon?
By Roman
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 12:06am
Light bulbs--check
Bags--check
How about indoor heating?
Water that doesn't come from a rain barrel?
Vegetables you didn't grow on the collective farm?
Here's a good one: music, television, and internet unless powered by a cruelty-free bicycle generator, with a state-wide 50% excise tax on the sale of those generators to fund...um...er...let's see here...sunshine and good feelings!
Here's a little fun fact for you!
By Brian Riccio
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 12:45am
The Independent UK 7/26/17
Think about that next time you get a fish dinnah ta go in that nice Styrofoam contaynah at Kelly's.
Yeah and
By Roman
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 1:11am
how much of that plastic is in the bags you leave with and how much is in the packaging for everything else you buy to put into your reusable hemp basket?
Pure virtue-signaling nonsense.
Yes and no
By Bob Leponge
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 2:11am
On the one hand, it is in fact virtue signalling nonsense.
On the other hand, it may nudge a few more people in the direction of thinking about the environmental consequences of things a little more often, which means that it may actually be of some ultimate value.
No.
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 7:58am
A few people thinking different changes nothing.
How can you call this nonsense when you know nothing about it?
By eo-pal
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 10:18am
Plastic is big deal in our oceans. Plastic does breakdown but it takes an extremely long time. Furthermore, it ends up as microscopic particles. These particles are mistaken for food by tiny planktonic creatures. Those critters are eaten by fish and those fish are eaten by fish etc. etc. Eventually, we'll find these plastics in us. We're already finding them in dolphins and whales, and this is affecting their population by producing unhealthy offspring.
Listen, this measure will absolutely not stop this issue, but it will certainly help. Boston is a coastal city and this is a responsible move to cut down on plastic use. It certainly has in other coastal cities such as San Francisco.
Sure, some folks use this to virtue signal but I disagree that that's all it is. It more sounds to me that you're attaching this social commentary to the issue at hand. Aside from your criticism that this is virtue signalling, what harm or damage could it possible do?
95% of plastic polluting the
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 6:06am
95% of plastic polluting the world's oceans comes from just ten rivers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-497...
Hey low blow on Kellys dude,
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 10:17am
Hey low blow on Kellys dude, they use those weird cardboardy type things for take out.
Not at the one in Medford...
By Brian Riccio
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 3:51pm
ate there last night and Styrofoam was in full effect. I love Kelly's! My brother worked there when they didn't allow women to work there.
You’re really milking that
By Metoo
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 10:44am
You’re really milking that Boston accent hater.
Well, gee!
By Brian Riccio
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 3:52pm
You should heah me on the radio. I'm Boston accent to go!
Banned bulbs? You should try going to a store sometime
By adamg
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 7:44am
I don't know where you shop, but the supermarkets around me still stock plenty of incandescent bulbs.
Banned?
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 9:12am
More like "laughed out of existence by people who can't afford the energy bills to run them".
I suppose Roman drives around in a Flivver? Because YOU CAN'T BAN MAH CAR!!!
Roman's just cranky
By lbb
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 11:49am
Roman's just cranky. He shakes his fist at cloud and yells about how they took his job down at the buggy whip factory. Eat some prunes, grandpa!
Soda tax?
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 7:57am
Maybe we already have one?
Whoa! Be careful!
By statler
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 8:56am
That's a mighty steep slippery slope you are standing on!
How about all wasteful things
By Roslindaler
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 8:56am
Plastic bags are just wasteful. I’m for banning or taxing such things. Thrift is a virtue.
Curious!
By spin_o_rama
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 10:35am
https://i.redd.it/h9vi44l82o401.png
We should ban indoor
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 10:59am
We should ban indoor OVERheating, by requiring thermostatic radiator valves in every building.
They are the plastic twisty-knobs right on the radiator, labeled 1 through 5. European countries have required them for years. They make a world of difference in saving energy AND making buildings much more comfortable.
This would save far more energy than a bag ban.
Think about this the next time you're in an overheated building with the windows open.
Instead of banning anything, ever...
By Bob Leponge
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 2:09am
.... how about just taxing it at the full lifecycle cost it imposes on society? The global environmental damage done by a plastic bag is not infinite; you can put a price on it.
Of course
By Roman
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 2:40am
after all, there's money to be made in figuring out what every single solitary thing costs. We could set up a central planning bureau (staffed by loyal blue-staters, of course) to figure it out for everyone. They can even come up with five-year plans for environmental footprint reductions every seven years.
Or, we could not try to calculate a single number for a "cost" that varies drastically for every person and every bag. What's the "cost" of a bag that's recycled? What's the "cost" of a bag that's used to line a wastebasket? Or one that's used to carry my wet swim trunks and flip flops back from the swimming pool for many years? How about the cost of the garbage bag I now have to buy to line my trash can?
We could just, you know, let the market do its thing and actually fine people for dumping and littering instead of letting them off because they're politically connected or too rich or too poor or too white or too brown.
Gee, Mr Free Market!
By Brian Riccio
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 7:31am
Can’t eat or drink money, can you? By all means, let’s just tax the shit out of polluters now, because that money is really going to stop all that pollution later. Uh-huh.
It is abundantly clear from all your posts
By Marco
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 9:08am
on this subject that you are simply angry that you won't be getting free plastic bags anymore.
Now they are 5 cents...for MUCH BETTER BAGS (like, your heavy wet swim truncks will never fall through these).
Is 5 cents breaking you Roman?
Do you turn in your empty bottles and cans, or do you let the little old Chinese ladies take care of that for you on trash day?
If the latter STFU please.
Also if you don't mind looking like a hoarder you have almost an entire year to stockpile free, shitty plastic bags for all your trash-can-lining needs. In essence that's probably buying you 3 years without purchasing a bag, not to mention all the other towns and cities that will still give you the shitty low-quality bags you so crave.
Maybe you could like, move away from here to one of THOSE glorious places?
Or, wait, its the nanny state isn't it? You just don't wanna be told how to live you life huh? I hear you there. I should be able to drive on the LH side of the road just like originally intend. Damn fascist government restricin my freedumb!
Your way was tried once
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 9:11am
Long before you got to this planet with your theories amok evidence.
Rivers burned, dear.
You could move to a country that sees things differently ... but you might not like the winters lit only by burning rivers.
Amazing
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 9:14am
It is almost as if somebody learned nothing from the massive failures of the 20th century.
Whats the true "cost" of driving?
By spin_o_rama
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 10:41am
Cause I bet you don't wanna let any of those subsidies go. But let the market direct everything else, right.
Also adorable that you think our police forces, which can barely handle keeping motorists in check, are going to effectively enforce this.
Suck it up and pay for the plastic bags dude.
Exactly!
By Kaz
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 12:41pm
I mean, why should you have to BUY little plastic bags when you were getting them for FREE before as part of your total shopping experience. I mean, everyone else wasn't using them but you were. They were all paying a bit more for every item in the store so that you could afford to have FREE trashbags, swimsuit bags, etc. I mean, you got so many free ones that you probably *still* threw out 75% of them because you only needed one or two a week but you were getting 10-20 every time you got groceries because of how flimsy they were that carrying a gallon of milk (which has a handle on it) required two of those bags so the bag handles didn't rip! Subsidized FREE plastic bags for your needs! Why should you have to buy them when the cost can be spread to everyone else equally!
Oh, but fuck those people who want universal healthcare.
Woo hoo. Think of the money I
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 5:14pm
Woo hoo. Think of the money I'm saving because I reuse bags and no longer subsidize people who get new bags every time which cost the store less than a penny each. When do I get my price cut?
I would happily buy my
By anon
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 5:23pm
I would happily buy my toothpaste in bulk, carrying it home in my hands squirted from a machine in the supermarket. Why do I have to SUBSIDIZE all those freeloaders who demand wasteful toothpaste tubes for FREE?
Pages
Add comment