data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f05c6/f05c6a54d041fae9f3c7d264cbb38ef4d2c2d5d2" alt="Jascha Franklin-Hodge discusses deadly double-threat crashes"
Boston Streets Chief Jascha Franklin-Hodge discusses safety issues on Centre Street.
Mayor Wu and City Streets Chief Jascha Franklin-Hodge told a packed auditorium at the Ohrenberger School tonight they are committed to making Centre Street safer through a reconfiguration that will include reducing the number of travel lanes on each side from two to one, with a new third lane in the center for left-turn lanes at intersections and for various "flex" uses, such as letting first responders speed to emergencies.
The plan, for which Franklin-Hodge said work will begin in October, will also include pedestrian islands at intersections, reconfiguring traffic lights and moving parking spaces away from the curb to create "protected" bike lanes along the curbs.
Franklin-Hodge acknowledged the devil is in the details and said the city will hold at least three separate meetings for residents and small-business owners to offer advice on issues such as bus stops and preserving parking spaces.
Both he and Wu said traffic data, from both 2019, when the idea was first proposed after the death of Marilyn Wentworth, show the road is simply unsafe. It has higher numbers of crashes than "peer roads" in Boston and across the state, as well as speeders and other drivers who create safety problems.
Creating single through lanes on each side would slow drivers down and end lane weaving and "double threat" crashes, in which one driver stops for a pedestrian, who then gets slammed into by a driver in the neighboring lane who doesn't stop, he said.
Franklin-Hodge added that the city can do all this while losing only 8 of the roughly 224 parking spaces along Centre, and that it's possible that could be reduced to just 5 spaces. Also, he said, the city will track what the changes do to the side streets off Centre and, if need be, would look to installing speed bumps and other measures to slow down any speeders.
Tensions ran high as both opponents and supporters - many of whom wore green tops - came to the microphone to offer their opinions, in an auditorium that seemed to be relatively evenly split. But through it all, only one person was outright booed - Catherine Vitale of Dorchester, who used to stand outside Wu's house screaming through a bullhorn at 7:30 a.m. but who is now running for an at-large City Council seat. Vitale's arguments that "it's not the government's job to keep us safe!" and that the Centre Street plan is "bullshit!" followed by a rant about crime in places like Dorchester proved too extreme for a number of people in the auditorium.
Wu, who lives in neighboring Roslindale, said she is in West Roxbury several times a week - as a mother to two young sons, who play lacrosse and soccer there. "I'm gripping tightly onto the hands of my kids" whenever they have to cross Centre, because it's just so unsafe, she said.
She was echoed by West Roxbury parents and residents who said they constantly worry about their kids crossing the street or who sometimes go shopping elsewhere for fear of getting hit. One man said he shouldn't have to worry about his sons, 9 and 13, when they go to a store for some gum.
One resident said her brother died getting hit by a car at a young age, that that forever changed her life and that she does not want anybody else to go through that. Another, a pediatric nurse, told Wu and Franklin-Hodge to "sign her up" for any needed work to change Centre Street into something safer. Saving just one life would make it all worth it, she said.
Supporting the plan was City Councilor Kendra Lara (West Roxbury, Jamaica Plain). "The really important step is making sure Centre Street is safe for everybody," she said.
Sarah Breuer, who is mobility impaired, said she would love to have a Centre Street where she could cross safely. She said when she is in her wheelchair, she is no taller than a kindergartner, which means drivers speeding down Centre might not even see her, so she dreads trying to go from one side to another.
Opponents cited many of the same arguments that they used to kill a similar proposal in 2019, that eliminating travel lanes is too extreme, that maybe the road would be safer if bicyclists stopped running red lights, if pedestrians got their heads away from their phones, if BPD actually enforced existing laws.
Jose Diaz said people should reject the idea that government knows best. One Centre Street business owner said the proposal would harm the neighborhood's senior citizens, because they don't ride bikes or walk, and need to drive places, such as her store. Abner Bonilla, who lives on American Legion Highway in Roslindale, urged West Roxbury residents to fight the proposal. He said American Legion, which is now down to one lane in front of his house, is still unsafe because people still speed.
Steve Morris, who led the fight against the plan in 2019, and who printed up lawn signs in 2021 to keep the plan dead, said, again, that it seemed the fix was in and, after noting all the green shirts in the auditorium, said it was obvious bicyclists were up to their old tricks. He was joined by another resident who said more explicitly it was all a plot by bicyclists: That the changes would fail, then the city would turn all of Centre Street into a pedestrian path with free-for-all parking.
Brian Kenneally added a new argument: That Marilyn Wentworth, who walked with a cane, "was not in the crosswalk when she was unfortunately killed, so please stop saying that." Other opponents then raised that issue as well.
Kenneally: She wasn't in the crosswalk.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7007a/7007ae240e3b1424ed700e6894012e06c4639103" alt="Brian Kenneally"
One supporter of the plan allowed how, OK, people should walk in crosswalks, "but if you don't, you don't deserve to die."
Wentworth's son, Matt, was the last person of the night to speak. He did not address the allegation about his mother, but said he was there to support the plan, that after all the grief he and his father, Al, went through, he just wants to keep it from ever happening to anybody else.
As Al Wentworth (in white tee shirt) and others listen, Matt Wentworth urges support for proposal:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b27b/1b27b8fa07a756ac013438901225790be556d1f5" alt="Matt Wentworth"
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Steve
By Sock_Puppet
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 5:27am
I'll take "Boston's Dumbest Controversy" for 100, please.
CENTRE STREET
By THOMAS MCCUSKER
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 11:35am
"It's not governments job to keep us safe." Would like to know the educational background of that speaker. But given the present quality on the City Councill, she'd probably be an improvement.
No reflection
By Tom
Fri, 06/02/2023 - 6:58am
I attended the meeting because I live on a side street off center and we have ten kids on our small street. Speeding on residential streets and running stops signs is unsafe right now so I can’t imagine what it will be like with the road diet. Most people there did not support this change; however, the mayor decided to break into small groups in the beginning of the meeting and have only 50 people sign up to speak. She did this to deter residents to feel like they had no voice and couldn’t speak their concerns. Therefore, a majority of the residents left in frustration and the supporters of this plan, who were clearly organized, signed up to speak taking the opportunity away from others who would have liked to voice their concerns. I went to the back in the small groups to hear what these experts had to say and it was concerning how little they knew the area and didn’t have even have the correct maps showing the side streets. Then they asked residents to write their concerns on sticky notes which ended up to be a disorganized mess. It’s disheartening to see how the meeting was run and how it will happen with no thought, reflection or concern how this will change the traffic flow to side streets and what safety measures need to be in place BEFORE this change happens. They have no plan to mitigate traffic concerns or speeding on side streets and just told us to call 311 in hopes of something happening after the fact. I agree there should be a bike lane in west Roxbury and safety measures on center st, but they have no plan and call in “experts” who have never lived in the area and I’m pretty sure never lived in Boston until recently. What I learned from this meeting is that the mayor, these experts and the city councilor does not care about the concerns of their citizens and have no reflection or plan on how this change will effect all residents who live on center. They only wanted to hear one voice in that meeting.
I'm sorry you were so confused by the meeting
By HenryAlan 2.0
Fri, 06/02/2023 - 12:33pm
Although the published agenda did include break-out sessions, the Mayor polled the audience regarding preference, and at least 2/3 preferred sticking to that format. And it's a good thing we did, because that's the only way to get more granular information and crucially, the best way to give feedback. I get the idea that you went in with a very closed mind, and that nothing short of an announcement that Centre Street wouldn't be touched would have satisfied your desired outcome. Sorry, doesn't work that way. You aren't the only person who lives there. This isn't just some wonky idea from outsiders who've never been to Boston. A large number of people who live near Centre Street, who have the very local knowledge you demand, have also concluded that a lane reduction is the only way to meaningfully address safety concerns.
As for mitigation of downstream consequences, Franklin-Hodge was pretty clear about that, saying that mitigation steps would be taken as the picture becomes more clear. He even offered several descriptions of what such steps might be.
Finally, I thought your idea about a bi-directional cycle track combined with angled parking on the opposite curb was interesting enough to spend some time thinking about whether that can work. Centre St. is 60 feet wide mostly (some variability due to curvature). Right now, I believe the configuration is this:
Parking: 8 feet
Travel Lanes: 44 ft (4x11)
Parking: 8 feet
A bi-directional cycle track needs a minimum of 12 feet (5 for each direction, 2 foot buffer). Angled stall parking, curb to street is 15 feet, but you need another 10 for cars backing out (look at Beacon St. in Brookline for an example of this). That leaves 23 feet for car travel lanes, which is to say 2 lanes. But here's the kicker. The idea, which yields no additional travel space, would result in less parking. Parallel parking on both sides provides more spots than angled parking on one side. You know who knows these things, and can model it out to determine whether it's viable? The traffic engineers that you and some other people prefer to at best ignore, or in some cases outright sneer and jeer. It's an example of why their expertise is helpful -- non-viable options aren't even presented because they'd waste our time.
[edit to remove a section meant as response to another post]
Not true
By Mark-
Fri, 06/02/2023 - 5:41pm
You wrote: “Most people there did not support this change.” That’s simply not true. Applause for speakers from both sides was roughly equal. There was no preference given to speakers for one side or the other, people simply lined up to sign in for a spot. But the number of speakers ended up heavily favoring the 3 lane plan, which simply shows the strong support from attendees. I know, the “Save Centre St.” crowd likes to think they represent some huge majority. But the truth is, the city's proposal has a lot more support than you want to admit.
Not my neighborhood
By BostonDog
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 6:43am
So the changes won't affect me one way or another. But the city/state showed their hand with the pandemic and Orange Line street changes. No meetings, no studies, no waiting. Within a week they had roads reconfigured and optimized for mass transit and walking/bikes. It was almost shocking how quick the city and state planned and implemented roadway changes.
Nothing bad happened as a result. Most people seemed to think the changes where an improvement or at least not nearly as bad as predicted.
So I'm skeptical of these hearings and naysayers and officials who claim changes take time.
Excuse me
By anon
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 7:25am
Boylston Street would like a word with you.
To be fair, on the one side
By NoMoreBanks
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 8:19am
To be fair, on the one side there's city traffic engineers went to university studying how road design effects behavior and looking at decades of research to form evidence based opinions on best practices, and on the other, the average neighbor of Centre Street, at least, believes that "bicyclists" are staging a false flag coup to import communism.
Sometimes two perspectives really shouldn't be weighed equally.
You're absolutely right. In
By Harry
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 10:21am
You're absolutely right. In one corner you have the Harvard grads who probably never drove on a city street until 2020 when no one else was on them. In the other you have the residents who have lived in the neighborhood and have relied on getting up and down that street for years on the other.
I think I know who I'd rather listen to.
The people who spoke in favor
By adamg
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 11:07am
Mostly seemed to be people who actually drive, walk or, yes, bike down Centre Street.
There are people in West Roxbury who seem to think the entire world is out to destroy them when (and I speak as a former Brighton resident who has long lived in Roslindale) most of the world actually couldn't care less about them. Nobody goes out of their way to drive down Centre Street so they can park and then rub their hands in glee thinking about ways to bring down the neighborhood. Nobody goes out of their way to drive down Centre Street, period.
So the only people who are going to show up at something like this are not pointy-headed academic chromedomes but people who actually have a reason to be on that road (yes, the original road-diet idea was by a professor at Northeastern, who I guess could wear bow ties in his off hours, I don't know, but he only started his study when one of his students, who grew up in West Roxbury, suggested looking at it).
"he only started his study when one of his students, who.."
By Anonymous
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 3:16pm
So the original Centre Street road diet design was the result of a college student at Northeastern from West Roxbury who suggested to his professor they study the street design from a public safety perspective and not the reasons and conspiracy theories opponents have suggested? Interesting.
I've been driving and walking Centre St for 30 years. I understand why many drivers want to get from one end to the other, St Theresa to Holy Name as fast as possible. I get why people like to double park because they'll just be a minute but none of these conveniences should come at the cost of injury to others or cost other people their lives.
It makes me sad and a little angry when opponents of a better street design argue that people who lost their lives on Centre St. may be responsible. No one has a right to commit vehicular homicide under the law, in or out of a crosswalk.
In MA, bicyclists can take the lane, that is the law. Also in MA, bicycles cannot take the sidewalk in a business district. So on Centre Street in West Roxbury as it is now bicyclists can (1) take the lane or (2) share it with cars.
I'd have thought drivers would prefer that bicycles (1) not take they lane and that (2) drivers not have to share the lane with a bicyclist but rather give (3) bicyclists their own lane. But of course that would require the 6 lanes allocated to automobiles -- two for parking and four for driving -- would lose 1. [img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ELH59FeXsAA7Q8O?format...
For the record, the original redesign retained 205 of 221 on-street parking spots. The new plan retains 216. Neither of the two plans lost a substantial number of on-street parking spots, and there is substantial parking in private and public lots on Centre. I.E. Walmart, CVS, Bank of America, Macy's, Roche Bros..
[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ELH592XXsAMqO0-?format...
I can't recall if the Mayor ran on the question of Centre Street but I do recall her opponent, who lost, ran against it. And Five-Cars to my surprise came out for it. I don't pretend to understand what is driving the opposition because I don't think the objections about parking carry much weight.
Ken Martin still says a majority of West Roxbury opposes the plan, and that support and opposition expressed at the meeting was not an even split.
My view is that opposition is reactionary and in defiance of the authority of a Mayor they disagree with on more than one issue.
I'll try to keep an open mind about reasons for not adopting the design. Please feel free to share them here.
Raises hand
By Kaz
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 7:43pm
Having stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night, I feel I understand the opposition.
"Dey took our roads!"
There you go.
I didn't go to Harvard, I
By ZachAndTired
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 11:13am
I didn't go to Harvard, I live in West Roxbury just off Centre Street, and I think we're long overdue for the road diet to go in. Care to listen to me?
I’d probably disagree with
By Harry
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 4:28pm
I’d probably disagree with you but I’d certainly listen to your points. I think your opinion matters more than someone who appears out of nowhere with the mindset that they know better than you or I.
Some people do know better than you or I
By berkleealum
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 9:51pm
why is that such a bad thing?
Because
By Harry
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 11:09pm
… they just drop their ideas on the people who live here then just move on. They don’t have to deal with anything when their ideas fail while the people who live here do.
They may have knowledge, but an issue like this requires a large amount of local knowledge. No degree from higher education gives you that.
Yeah, about those Orange Line
By anon
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 11:09am
Yeah, about those Orange Line street changes...they just slapped some "Bus Lane" paint on various roads, then walked away.
Maybe it helped during the Orange Line shuttle. But that was in October 2018. Meanwhile the paint is still there today, and many of these streets don't have ANY bus service. Besides the inefficiency this creates, you have to use some of those lanes to be in the right place to make turns.
Fortunately this nonsense is being ignored by cops just as much as by the driving public. But it should not be held up as an example of smart road design.
Wu is full of it
By anon
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 7:15am
Shes not walking on Centre multiple times a week. Last I checked Westie/Millennium and Hynes aren’t near Centre, so taking your kids to practice/games wouldn't bring you to it.
Also, that must be awkward. Most of the neighborhood HATES her.
This is a done deal, she went to this meeting to save face so she can point to it later as “community engagement” when its ultimately jammed down the neighborhoods throat.
is it possible
By berkleealum
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 9:10am
to just disagree with something Wu does without attributing her actions to some grand plot to continually save face from whatever perceived embarrassment you’ve imagined?
That's reserved …
By Ari O
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 12:17pm
… for white men.
Also...
By MrZip
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 2:51pm
...some might point out that the use of the term, "face-saving" is a racist dig at the Mayor's heritage. Of course I'm sure it was just a coincidence.
I live within ~.5 of Wu
By amurray23
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 9:18am
and I find myself on Centre all the time. Agreed that it is chaotic and unsafe, happy they are doing something about it. Not everything is a false flag conspiracy.
Half a Wu?
By Rob
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 1:35pm
Half a Wu?
Can you convert that to rods or smoots for the rest of us please?
That's impressive
By adamg
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 9:22am
And kind of scary that you claim to be following the mayor around at all times, because how else would you state with such assurance that you know she never goes to Sugar or Maria's or Comella's or wherever before or after a soccer game at Millennium Park?
Mayor Selfie
By anon
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 9:32am
Makes her presence know. And I live in the area and have never seen her on Centre.
Just an observation ya nitwit.
So you're standing on Centre Street all the time?
By adamg
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 10:03am
And you know for a fact that the mayor constantly makes her presence known when taking her kids to and from soccer?
Far be it from me to suggest how to spend your time, but have you considered another hobby?
So you were you behind the purple dot ...
By Friartuck
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 10:06am
Of the MBTA bus flasher the other day. I see.
She could also be going to
By MissM-not-signed-in
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 10:07am
She could also be going to Billings Field or the field next to Catholic Memorial, both of which could take her down Centre St. And the whole neighborhood doesn't her; just the lace-curtain fascists.
ADAM
By John Costello
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 1:45pm
This is hate speech.
The reference to "Lace Curtain" is done in the manner of an ethnic slur. She is calling the Irish-American community of West Roxbury, long called "Lace Curtain Irish" collectively fascists.
Take it down please.
Otherwise, yes Centre Street needs a little calming.
I am just waiting for the Camberville / JP crowd to be as concerned about Warren Street and Blue Hill Ave.
JOHN
By Pete X
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 2:09pm
Why the F are you bringing "Camberville" in to this? Enough with your dastardly anti-Cambridge slurs. Anyway, we've got plenty of our own car zealots to deal with here in town and have no time to attend a West Roxbury meeting.
Hate Speech is Hate Speech
By John Costello
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 2:22pm
Adam allowed a subtle ethnic slur to be put up. He posted it.
Camberville is a collective noun and is used by people from both Cambridge and Somerville.
lol
By anon
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 3:02pm
Boston Irish complaining about "lace curtain" (which was mostly leveled by lower class irish catholics against their well to do neighbors) is almost as ridiculous as the Cuomo brother losing it over being called "Fredo"
calm down.
Lace-curtain fascists
By Anonymous
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 3:39pm
I think your concern is not calling Irish-Americans lace-curtain but calling them fascists. Lace-curtain fascists may be referring to pro-Trump Irish-Americans not anti-Trump Irish Americans. The writer's use is not a categorical statement about the whole class of (under-represented and marginalized) Irish-Americans. But it is a harsh criticism of some of their politics. The question is whether voters who support Trump support fascism.
Here's some food for thought: Banning ideas and authors is not a ‘culture war’ – it’s fascism
this has been explained over and over
By berkleealum
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 4:22pm
the poster is mad because he himself was called out for poor use of language. i don’t even remember what it was at this point, but he’s been champing at the bit ever since.
Piss Off Oboe Boy
By John Costello
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 5:34pm
Seriously.
I'm surprised you can get through doorways with that chip on your shoulder against me.
i don’t care about you at all lol
By berkleealum
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 9:45pm
you are just a fascinating character. you write with the cleanest prose of anyone here yet you manage to say the dumbest shit of anyone here. gotta love it
Oh, We Get It
By Pete X
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 3:47pm
It's ridiculous how much you hate people who live in Cambridge and pathologically bring us up at every turn, even if we have nothing to do with the issue at hand. It reflects poorly on any legitimate point you might have.
I'm sorry that you paid too much for coffee at 1369 that one time, I really am, but we're of no consequence in this current issue.
Fighting prejudice
By SamWack
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 2:42pm
When it comes to fighting prejudice, some like to fight fire with fire.
Warren Street
By SamWack
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 2:14pm
In Cambridge/Somerville is a nuisance, but it's only about 500 feet long, and the average speed is about 5 MPH.
Roxbury
By John Costello
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 2:20pm
Warren Street - Roxbury. Four lanes plus parking and a median between Quincy Street and Nubian Square.
OK
By SamWack
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 3:04pm
To be fair, it was an easy conclusion to jump to, given your reference to Camberville. The Warren Street I know has one end in Cambridge and the other in Somerville, even though it's only about 500 feet long. It's not much more than an alley, but is treated as a thoroughfare at rush hours.
John, not sure what you're trying to say here
By spin_o_rama
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 3:43pm
https://www.universalhub.com/crime/20230601/gunfir...
Are you inventing people to be mad at again?
Also as a fellow Irish-Catholic, I think you're stretching things here. Always the victim, etc.
Not A Victim
By John Costello
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 4:06pm
Just pointing out hypocrisy on two levels.
Malcolm X Boulevard is too wide. You go from Tremont Street in Mission Hill to Dudley Street. Both are neighborhood commercial corridors except there is the Epping Dragway in the middle.
I know you need one side for school buses but it has the same characteristics as Centre Street in JP, yet somehow it escapes vitriol owing that political West Roxbury is opposed to political JP.
Watching this debate is like drunk uncle versus know it all anthropology major at Thanksgiving. Both have some merits, both should understand the other and come to some sort of agreement.
I just think it is interesting that Adam let's a ethnic slur pass through a comment, which he posted.
So you chose whataboutism
By spin_o_rama
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 4:28pm
I'm remembering you aren't too fond of that when others do it lol
And as for the slur, I'm well aware of the historical reference, I just think you need to clutch your pearls a little less. Won't someone please think of those poor fascists feelings!
JOHN BOY
By Lee
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 9:53pm
Your heirloom lace curtains handmade by Irish nuns are getting dingy and dusty.
Take them down, please and give them a wash.
Impressive support
By Mark-
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 9:27am
Before this meeting, I thought there were a lot more of you on “the whole neighborhood hates this” side. But the very large crowd had much support for both the plan and Mayor Wu. With dozens of speakers, pro-change views vastly outnumbered the 4-lane supporters by as much as 3 to 1. Nearly everyone there identified themselves as nearby residents. Applause for both sides was strong, but it appeared to me that if there was a referendum of attendees, the city's plan would win.
Congratulations to the mayor, the organizers, and all the attendees for keeping the meeting civil. There was a lot of strong emotion that could have led to shouting matches or worse, but it was a good, peaceful debate.
Most of the neighborhood
By aljsdlfkjaoisje...
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 10:42am
It's true she lost West Roxbury during the election - but not by much. Check out this map of the voter breakdown. Most precincts in West Roxbury went 45% Wu, 55% Essaibi George. It's untrue that most of the neighborhood hates her.
Poplar St Expressway
By Mary B Barrows
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 11:53am
The speed limit on Poplar Street in Roslindale needs to be addressed. Drivers ignore the speed limit signage. Drivers have hit parked cars and make it difficult for homeowners to exit their driveways. It’s like playing chicken trying to turn onto the street. It’s dangerous! At my request in 2005 Boston transportation department claimed drivers do the speed limit. Of course they watch their speed if they know their being watched by a marked policed car!
Poplar
By EmilytheKidd
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 5:12pm
Agree fully that Poplar needs speed humps. Here’s something interesting, tho. The Transportation Dept wants to put in a relatively short bike lane. Nearby residents who ride their bikes every day assert this makes no sense. The cyclists say that they would never have enter Washington from Poplar. The bicyclists spoke up at the BTD walkthrough. They spoke up at the Neighborhood Association meeting. It will be fascinating to see whether the Transportation Dept will insist on building the bike lane anyway. Definitely keeping my eye on this one.
Also, just because you don’t
By anon
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 3:17pm
Also, just because you don’t vote for someone doesn’t necessarily mean you HATE them.
Shes not walking on Centre
By Scratchie
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 10:55am
Have you tried crying about it?
RL, Billings and the WR Little league fields...
By Pete Nice
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 10:59am
are all within 50 yards of Centre St. RL appears to have lots of non school related activities on the lower field (right on Centre).
Talk about painting everyone
By anon
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 2:10pm
Talk about painting everyone w/ the same brush. Hold your roll...
I'm in favor of it as I am tired of playing chicken (daily) on Centre St...the only reason you pretend to think everyone is against it is b/c the people that refuse to educate themselves about a road diet and main street districts have the loudest mouths.
The "SAVE CENTRE STREET" signs are a tad much...especially in places that are far out of the Main Street area. I stopped giving my business to those that display them.
Are they trying to save themselves from living in a vibrant area that has more than banks, nail salons and pizza parlors?
MacGregor?
By WR Voter
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 7:30am
Was new State Rep Bill MacGregor there? He was the candidate of road diet opponents. I thought he was going to stand up against this mess.
He was
By adamg
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 8:24am
Wu gave him a shoutout at the beginning. But he didn't say anything, at least not with a mic.
So typical politician that
By WR Voter
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 9:40am
So typical politician that says one thing to get elected then backs off once in office? He’s on the ballot next year. My vote was solely based on the road diet since his main opponent supported it. We need West Roxbury politicians to stand up to the mayor on this. I hope he does at the next meeting.
What position?
By Mark-
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 10:43am
In the dozens of mailers from Bill’s campaign, I never saw any statement about the 3-lane proposal for Centre St. I don’t think he took a position on it, and if he did it certainly wasn’t a keynote of his campaign.
MacGregor said at the Corrib
By WR Voter
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 11:00am
MacGregor said at the Corrib forum he wanted more community input and didn’t support the road diet as is. Orthman was the one saying he supported the City plan because his friend got hit crossing. That was in the Bulletin. I know some of the road diet opponents and they all backed MacGregor to stop this. This thing is now being shoved down our throats without any input and we have no one standing up for us.
MacGregor has no official standing
By HenryAlan 2.0
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 12:47pm
He lives in West Roxbury, so his opinion certainly matters, but as a representative to the General Court, he has no official influence over the City of Boston's plans for Centre Street.
Well...
By Rob
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 10:09pm
Well...
As that city street ties-in to state (DCR) highways, has a bridge or two that are maintained with state money, has a bridge bordering the area in question that will be renovated or something in a couple of years, has a state transportation agency running buses through it, has a state transportation agency running trains under it, with the state having some purview to investigate/help & even regulate some local issues, with a state government executive branch at least somewhat aware of & sympathetic to Boston issues, where state favor might help shake some money loose in the city's direction, having state agencies who probably like their budgets wanting to keep state reps happy-ish when they call (if it's not too much trouble)...
Having a state rep who is aware, informed, and somewhat on the same page would be a good thing, right?
It's a … city road
By Ari O
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 12:20pm
So the state rep doesn't really have jurisdiction. And a new state rep doesn't want to step on the city's toes.
Very correct. And yet this
By Max H
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 12:56pm
Very correct. And yet this question was asked of the rep candidates at every forum put on. Orthman was the one who gave his actual opinion and said the lane reduction was the only true way to eliminate the threat to people crossing a 4-lane road unless people want a stop light at every intersection. MacGregor said a lot of words about needing more community input and wanting a safer street but wouldn't say what the plan should look like. Same with Segal.
You are a single issue voter
By Kinopio
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 10:54am
You are a single issue voter who will vote for anyone who is for killing pedestrians? You are sick in the head.
So when exactly did MacGregor
By WRyan
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 11:18am
So when exactly did MacGregor say that he was anti-road diet? I’ve heard that he said he wants there to be a vigorous community process and for the community to have input but how and when did he run as the anti-road diet candidate? Also since this was such an incredibly important issue to you one would assume that you would have gone to the biggest meeting about it and voiced your opinion? Thirdly I was under the understanding that this is a city issue not a state one. While we are at it, what are the positions of Rob Consalvo and Mike Rush on the road diet? What are they saying?
Good question on Rush. Don’t
By WR Voter
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 1:30pm
Good question on Rush. Don’t know what his stance on this is at all or if he was there. Consalvo doesn’t represent West Roxbury so don’t care what he thinks here but Rob is a good guy in general.
You want to tell Consolvo
By WRyan
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 7:24pm
You want to tell Consolvo that? His district absolutely includes part of WR and includes the areas surrounding it. He regularly posts and tweets about events he attends in WR like the senior prom and is even holding his next fundraiser in WR. I’d be interested in hearing his position.
back-row bill
By Stop the Cyclists
Fri, 06/02/2023 - 10:26am
He made us all think he "had" West Roxbury's backs on this, then he says nothing in the back. Back Row Bill - 'They" are all the same! I hope he follows through too but this is not a good start. We're all going to be forced to bike by Mayor Wu soon.
Hiding the Design?
By anon
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 7:49am
It sounds like the City did not show their actual design and solicit feedback on it. Why not present an actual plan to which people and businesses can respond concretely?
Hardly hiding
By anon
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 8:53am
There were physical printouts the size of an entire table of the proposed street layout, and they were encouraging people to provide feedback via written notes.
Hiding the Design?
By anon
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 6:27pm
Based on this quote from the article and the lack of an image of the design, it sounded like the design may have been unclear.
"Franklin-Hodge acknowledged the devil is in the details and said the city will hold at least three separate meetings for residents and small-business owners to offer advice on issues such as bus stops and preserving parking spaces."
Could someone post the design with the details?
Pages